Discussion - Alone Coder.

Track: Long live all MSF readerzzzz! :)  
Author: Macros, 25 Aug 2K1, Kotlas  
-------------------------------------------------------

  Greetings (for the umpteenth time? :) you,
dear readers!    Now I want
bring to your attention a fragment
letters from Alone Coder from Ryazan. In this
parts of the letter AlCo affects very much
important, at least for me,
topic.     Thought it would be
interesting to you too, I decided to post this
fragment into the journal, and, along the way,
speculate...                          
  And this fragment begins like this:...     

AlCo> I read MSF#21  (yesterday for this
sat until 5:00!)                        

MS>  I also have old MSFs at night
I'm rereading...                           

AlCo>My opinion about the articles will be summarized in
table: ('plus' means - relation
positive, 'minus' - vice versa)       

readme +                                 
review 0                               
pistolet +                               
5th element +                              
manufacturers ++                         
MS> Oh, I was worried, I thought
someone might not like it...         

yellow pages 0                        
MS>  That's understandable. This text is my answer
text of the same name in ZX-Files #1 :)     

bulletin board + USSR + (explain to me, finally, why
unbelievera is always a yellow ball??? 8)))    
MS>  Sometime later, okay?.. Myself
funny... F-)                            

horoscope -                               
MS>  Why so? Although the text is really
stupid... :-/                             

about America2 +                           
MS> Oh! Rulez!                            

DMA vs GS 0                              
comrade.zonoff -                             
MS> Whoa! Have you read all of “Paragraphs”?    

journalism +                       
reverse effect 0                        
MS> That's right. Material fed incorrectly
but...                                      

true -                                 
[                                        
  right now the coder will philosophize: 
your picture of the world (with information field
and collective consciousness) is alien to me, because
such a world is in principle unknowable, and
therefore uninteresting.                     
MS>  Such a world is practically knowable, and
interesting no less than the material.        

AlCo> My picture of the world is scientific.       
You admit in your speculations
statements that are impossible
check (see for example about the second sun) -
it doesn't make sense according to Occam's principle.
MS> Kunfortunately, I don’t know what
is Occam's principle, but these
"conclusions" are quite real and easy
verifiable.  First of all, you won't
deny that human thought
material, otherwise life on our
it would be impossible for the planet
theoretically, let alone practically.
Example - homo sapiens is sitting on the shore
rivers.  He wants to drink, but sits motionless. B
eventually dies from dehydration
body.  But this is the most primitive
an example of materialization of thought.             
  Let's not forget that man
inherited creativity from God, and
therefore the person can safely be called
a thinker.  Everything that surrounds us is
is ultimately a product
materialization of our thoughts.  We want
build a house - we build it.           
  I’ll give you one closer to you and me
example. In your first letter (to me) you
wondered if I had traveled
other cities, asked to describe
impressions.   At that moment real
I didn't travel.               
  Everything would be fine, but somehow it touched me
your question, and I often struggle with this
thought about it.  As a result we have...
No, we have a huge MSF in the next one
report about my trip. I hope you
it will be interesting!                     
  Here we see the initial thought thatyou appeared, I supported her,
the thought form was saturated, and in the end - that’s all
it materialized.                   
  An even simpler example: see 20,21
MSF's - I really needed access to
to the Internet so that I can spread
your creation, download the software and get in touch
with other people.  Back then there was nothing
foreshadowed that my desire
will come true.   Theoretically - access to
I couldn’t get internet!       
  Now all this is there.                
 This can be called a miracle, but you can also
how.  I'm not trying to take away your vision
peace or impose your own. Here I have stated
give you the idea in detail - it’s clear,
provable and quite real. Moreover,
This can be approached from a scientific point of view
vision;  after all, it has long been proven that thought
material.  Another thing is that the whole truth
life from the average person
trying to hide, I'm not saying now who
and for what.  But even in the Bible
it is said that if you want to know
the truth - you will recognize it. And if you will
sit and wait until she comes to you
will come - you can’t wait.          
  ...Examples of materialization of thoughts can be
bring many.  Every moment of ours
life is an example. Another thing is
that our consciousness, perception of life
turned in the other direction, and, instead of
in order to noticethe obvious we are looking for
something where neither theoretically nor
there is practically nothing useful.  We
We stand with our backs to the truth. And, instead of
to turn and look at her, we
we look into the distance, as if our gaze
will circle the globe and see this
ray of light.  But this is no longer possible
practically, not theoretically.            
  So there are still more examples. My friend -
Gunfighter - at one time I really wanted to find
mouse and have Internet access. This
incredible, but now it’s on his desk
lies an excellent little rat, and 100 meters away
from the house there is some kind of internet cafe.   
  I use the words "miracle" deliberately.
"incredible" so that our perception does not
resisted and missed it until
consciousness.  The sooner we understand all this,
so much the better.  We will understand that the main and
the only source of our problems is us
yourself.  If we created a problem, then
only we need it.  This will tell you
any psychologist, but all psychology
unthinkable with a purely scientific approach.     
  You say that such a world is unknowable.
No.  "He who has eyes, let him see." We don't
We see if we don't want to.                    
 There are gigabytes of examples, but
why do this? The essence is the same, and the sooner
we accept it, so much the better.                 
  Matter is not the main thing, and it is not worth it
obsess over it.If you stand now
on the spot, you can lose a lot
time.                                 

AlCo>  If you don't use this
principles, reap the population (clutter)
the universe with imaginary objects and
phenomena that cannot be observed
neither directly nor indirectly, i.e.  write
pseudoscientific tomes on topics, absolutely
meaningless, such as discussing questions about
number of angels on the point of a needle ;))    
MS>  That's why the Universe is limitless,
so that we fill it, i.e. in fact,
created their own little universes.
Imaginary objects can be observed without
only indirectly, but also directly. If you understand
that our spirit has degenerated, and try
develop it - and we have such
opportunities - these are the products of our
mental creativity we will clearly
observe.   And not only with closed ones
eyes.                                 

AlCo> Okay, I screwed up a lot,
Actually, I don't like philosophy. Those people
who call themselves philosophers often
out of my mind %)                        
MS>  As, by the way, those who try
convict others of madness :|              

AlCo> A good example is Jason             
Krueger/Delirium Tremens, who studies
JUST in this specialty :)))       
MS>  Also a good example - article in
S.Extacy, a magazine from England. Tama us,
Russian spektrumists are called Nazis
for the fact that we write in Russian! 8-O   

]                                        
DI:HALT music +                          
review ++                              
MS>  Thanks to Joker.  Although he highlighted
too few negative points
raised little criticism.   I would criticize
more would be even better! :)         

swordshaker -                            
MS> Well... I see...                     

morning of the hacker +                            
karaoke +                                
PSV diary 0                            
MS>  Oh, in vain! I read this without laughing
I can't.  Here I am, author, how many times already
I read this text, but I don’t care
I like it.                                

9.5 weeks 0                             
MS> This is for Joker.  Let it be
more active :)                            

lamer corner +                          
Katerina1 + (are you still at school SO
wrote??? =8-[ ]                          
MS> Well... in general... yes...               
AlCo> and I also wanted to ask the old ones
MSF's to get acquainted with your
creative development ;)))                
MS>  Maybe number 17 or 18 is for you
I'll send...                                 

Katerina2 + (though I don’t know which one here)
the work is describedG)               
MS> Yes... I forgot too... ;)       

little by little 0                          
between us girls +                   
azx-monstrum 0                           
matrix -                                 
MS> You don't know what LRU is!         

mail0                                  
spec in St. Petersburg +                          
interview -                               
MS> A bit old...                         

Mordor --                                
MS>  In vain... although you weren’t in our
Mordor!                                 

warlock1 0                          
jews1 +                                  
jews2 +                                  
shit1 0                                  
shit2 -                                  
shitЗ + marazm ++                                
msf2 +                                   
[just keep in mind that I put it in the 'retro' category
grades based on language, not
meaning/plot/morality]                    

cyberpunks +                             
MS>  I wonder which part is the first or
second?                                  
--                                       
That's how things are. Although, in one text here
you can't prove anything, so I urge
Alone Coderto creative dialogue on
this topic!