Adventurer #10
30 сентября 1999 |
|
Interface - a success story Apple Macintosh.
(C), Mikhail Smirnov (CLEAR) Rybinsk PART II (Continued) Now we go again about the sound and not only that. (Brad as nonsense - nothing special). Ideal computers and there never there will be no glitches are everywhere, with the only difference is that some of their more than others. (Gluck - code, or hardware nedoglyad developers.) Constant disputes adherents Amiga and PC to read, of course, very interesting, but world of computers is much wider, so I talk about almost unknown in Russia and CIS computer, ranked second in the the world in prevalence after the PC - Apple Macintosh. (Apple has managed to 80 score Macs entire system of "popular" education dollars - from kindergartens to universities). I hasten to note - I did not call home to buy the Mac, so as it will be very irrational (in CIS). The history of creating the first computer Apple's a bit like a story Amiga is a story of ups and downs, not cease, and to this day. Everything started with the "garage", two other Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, learned of the output in light of a new microprocessor firms Motorola, decided to create a computer game on one card (up to this point they both were fascinated by electronics, In addition Wozniak worked in the firm "Hewlett Packard", and Jobs in the firm "Atari"). They planned to distribute it among the members of the computer club "Home Brew Computer Club", they have also previously organized. On the development took about six months, ready to board was then placed in a wooden cabinet. Computer show the newly attributed to the owner of the local computer store, who was a member of the club. He ultimately offer Steve the deal: they make 50 per month computers, and he pays them in cash on fact. Then it's time to come up with the name of his firm. Charter sort out intricate variations Jobs jokingly suggested "apple" (apple). Quite unexpectedly, a word like both, and it they stopped. April 1, 1976, they established firm Apple. Evenings and weekends Stiva continued to work on your order. Exactly on time, they put 50 computers at the price of an Apple 666 dollars 66 cents. Satanic number caused a firestorm of local communities, members and customers - the price had to change. Cases began to go uphill. Millionaire Markulla invested in the company U.S. $ 250,000 and began to do business, providing Wozniak and Jobs freedom of creativity. The company's turnover in a short time was millions of dollars, and employs hundreds of workers and employees. In 1979 (3 years), the situation began to deteriorate - the computer market PC came from the "Big Blue" (IBM). We had to do something. Jobs together a team of talented engineers (some were from the "Xerox") and began work on a project called "Mac." This project was completely independent of the computers under the name Apple (which continued to be issued). Jobs did not suit IBM - this configuration, operating system, PRO-DOS and other things. According to his plan to a new computer, everything had to be built otherwise. At that time, Apple was carried out three projects: Macintosh, Golden Delicious and Pippin - all named for the varieties of apples. The name "Macintosh" picked up engineer Jef Raskin, who, like many Americans suffered spelling - grade Apples was written "Mcintosh". But the bug fix did not. That is such a curiosity owed his name of a newborn computer that uses no text, and graphical user interface. It was a real revolution in computer technology. The official birth year, "McIntosh" - 1984 th. Firstborn name or Macintosh XL Lisa. He had 3, 5 "floppy drive, 9" monochrome monitor, mouse, and a very modest current concepts of memory. Since then, "Poppy" fully grown, grown up and become indispensable artists, publishers, and all those who are not so it is important to delve into your computer engaged in it my favorite thing. To date, Macintosh is the only real alternative to the PC. With the release of "Windows 95" PC users are hoping that their heartthrob will be equivalent to the Mac. What in really? In the world of IBM PC - compatible computer computers themselves and their software is usually developed different firms. Therefore, comparing with PC Windows and Macs, compare features installed on them operating systems. However, since used the whole complex - the computer and OS, such an approach is not quite right. When buying a Mac user receives an integrated system in which software is closely associated with hardware. Clearly, in the case the PC is not so. Recently I read in Computerworld: "Many of the features InDesing (new publishing program) were shown how to Macintosh, and in Windows. However, in Progress Windows - version of the system error message is a memory that the audience responded with laughter and applause. " A friend of mine recently visited Switzerland, where he talked with the local network administrator in some school (50 and 9, Mac PC), so he complained that he had to tinker mainly pisyukami and to Macs, he almost did not fits. The main advantages of Macs as they were, and remain easy to use, the possibility of multimedia applications, the lack of compatibility problems. Despite the significant steps Microsoft's "ochelovechevaniyu" interface new operating systems, Apple remains leader in this field. If we are talking about ease of use of computers in general, then Apple benefits from the operating system. Given that the development graphical user interface (GUI) in the Apple started long before similar studies for the PC, the company was able for it Time to go far in front. McIntosh to So far easier to use, especially if we are talking about the integration of computers into a local network or configure them. Macs, as long isolated part of the computer business, today are the most "compatible" computers. In this area, Apple has made great advances, and overcome the gap between Macs and PC. Today, Macs can not only read and write PC - floppy disk drives CD-ROM, but also to perform Dos and Windows application. To this end, various Windows - emulators, one of the most last - Virtual PC (fully emulates Pentium MMX). In turn, the PC also have a Mac emulator. How it works under these emulators - a separate conversation, may require a separate article. Briefly what he saw himself: Virtual PC on Power Computing 225 MHz (clone Mac, Power PC processor 604) emulates Pentium 90 (Frequency Processor), video works almost two times slower; on a G3 350 MHz - Pentium 166 MMX with no brakes. Basilisk on the Pentium 166 MMX, overclocked to 187 MHz emulates 68020 1 MHz! :) (This is not a joke) I do not think that the emulator was written specifically for Mac BASIC and an emulator PC assembler (though who knows:)). In the early 90's, Apple again there were problems due to poor management of the company (by this time the founders of Company Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs went out of Apple and doing his own projects), anyone who feels like she began to prophesy ambulance death and withdrawal from the market of personal computers. Apple grabbed the "straw" in the idea of creating a RISC processor, the basic concept of which were laid in the mid 80's, and together with IBM and Motorola have released a new processor PowerPC. Almost immediately, along with the announcement of the PowerPC Apple unveiled a new computer on the basis of their "Power Mac". PowerPC processor was in some way response to Intel 'y on the Pentium MMX, and after Released Pentium II was presented to PowerPC G3. These steps, though correct the situation, but before the crisis was far away. In general, the struggle for markets between Apple and IBM is a struggle not so much between platforms as a whole (if we take the technical side, but not marketing), but among the processors. Intel, as the leader, stepping on the technological and architectural progress, collect all the "bumps, banks, running track, "wound on the condition and make not too shabby masterpieces, struggling not for long forward. After leaving in 1971, a landmark Intel 4004, this trend is seen the naked eye. Many firms found that the production of processors brings good dividends and have rushed to sculpt the "stones". Someone walked in the footsteps of Intel, someone went his own way, but the majority created their creations (at equal - the data bus and frequency) is much better than the leader. Example Z80 and 6800 more productive than the i8080. It was not in the frequency and bit rate, and in internal architecture of the processor: 6800 had only two general register (Both can operate simultaneously as batteries), using 3 cycles for the read-write when addressing memory. In this race, Motorola, barely kept pace with the leader (given only to certain processors): 8080 - 6800, 8086 - 68000, 80286 - 68020, 80386 - 68030, 80486 - 68040, Pentium - 68060, Pentium - Pro PowerPC, Pentium II - PowerPC G3. About the Pentium III, it is not a new processor (in the usual sense, the new processor on the old software on the same frequency The results are faster), this Pentium II with the addition of several new commands for work with the Internet, and more appropriate to be had called his type - "Pentium II +". But in a situation where competitors come on heels, incomes fall takes a bit zapudrit people brains (Marketing:)) and corrected it - the crowd pushes US users outdated Pentium II at the far shelf, and run to the store to buy "Modern Pentium III". Now for the G3 - a full 64-bit processor (with Intel Mersed still in draft) 5 pipelines, 2 of them for floating-point data, the L2 cache at least 512 KB. In September, appeared G4, and on its based Power Mac G4, which provides performance of more than 1 billion floating point operations per second (peak performance of the PowerPC G4 reaches 4 billion in the second). A distinctive feature of the new processor is embedded SIMD-module (under named Velocity Engine), allowing high speed parallel processing of vector data and has additional 162 processor instructions registers and 32 bit depth of 128 bits. When using a set of tests developed by Intel to demonstrate CPU speed Pentium III, PowerPC processor G4/500MGts was on average 2, 94 times faster Pentium processor III/600 MHz. When comparing the performance of the program SETI @ Home (the project the search for extraterrestrial intelligence) PowerPC G4/500 MHz processed within 6 hours of such a wealth of information, which is a Pentium III 600 MHz processed within 25 hours. For more information, please visit: http://www.apple.com/powermac/ processor.html. The lag in release processor models Apple neustraivalo in order to end with this and was formed an alliance with Motorola and IBM in the early 90's. Although 68060 was more productive Pentium 'A marketing ploy Intel' a - refusal to use digital system in the designation of its new processors nullified all attempts competitor to earn good money from increase in sales of Apple Macintosh. At the while the ratio of processors the desktop was about 1: 10 in favor of Intel. Fading rate induce sales of Macs Motorola fewer invest in developing the next generation of processors 680h0. Apple, experiencing another crisis, needed a miracle and a miracle in the form of alliance has brought not only financial investments but also intellectual and technological, represented by IBM. In 1993 he appeared PowerPC, which has within RISC - architecture (reduced instruction set) emulation commands 680h0 just software, in contrast to Pentium, which is only partially RISC - 80h86 hardware emulation commands (Intel, burdened with compatibility, not could afford such experiments). Pentium Pro was already a pure RISC, but for Compatibility with previous generations Number of processors crammed with such logic, that its production has now become almost unprofitable. Apple, jumping on the PowerPC, not particularly think about the consequences, to choose it was not anything else - "sink or swim." Download 680h0 worked the brakes, and popular programs had to re- recompile under PowerPC. New versions of the programs began to emerge with two installations for 680h0 and PowerPC The first processors PowerPC (601, 602, 603, 603e) inferior in performance similar to Intel, and only the PowerPC 604 were able to beat them, with the advantage was hardly significant. Along with the PowerPC 604 was released first samples of a 64-bit PowerPC processors 620, which has doubled more transistors than the 604-th. It was the biggest disappointment - superior Pentium Pro was not More than 10%, so in the next PowerPC 750 changed the microarchitecture, and obozvali PowerPC G3 (Generation 3 - CPU Third generation). Simply using a PowerPC G3 at Macs are not allowed to significantly increase sale. At this point, Apple's back (After the failure of "epic" with a computer "Future" - NeXT) one of the "founding fathers" - Steve Jobs. Under his strict guidance Apple has taken the path changes design of computers (both external and internal). Almost a year ago the world was surprised by the new development of Apple - iMac, especially designed for home entertainment and Work on the Internet. System unit iMac 'and is combined with a monitor (candy bar) and the dimensions of "monitor" from this almost not increased, body translucent - shows that under it, no 3, 5-th drive (seen in the states he no longer needed - Wherever tkni, around Internet). Since January 1999, iMac 'and come in packages of five different colors: - Blueberries - Lime - Strawberries - Mandarin - Grapes Now in more detail (May, 1999 city): PowerPC G3 333 MHz Cache 512Kbayt (Backside L2) system bus 66-MHz cache Tier 64Kbayt 32Mbayt RAM expandable to 384 MB Memory Bus 64-bit Internal hard drive 6Gbayt CD-ROM 24-x 2 USB ports for connecting up to 127 peripheral USB devices to each rate of interaction with devices 12Mbps Built-in 10/100BASE-T Ethernet Modem 56-K, supporting the K56flex standard and V. 90 Display: - Type of multiple-scan, the tube shadow mask: 15 ", the size of 0, 28 - 6Mbayt video memory - Refresh up to 117 Hz Video: - Built-chip ATI RAGE PRO Turbo 3D akselleratsiey with 2D/3D graphics Two built-in speaker with support The SRS Integrated microphone connectors input / output Keyboard Apple USB: - Change angle of the keyboard - Works well as a USB hub Apple USB Mouse Height: 39, 5 cm with stand Width: 38 cm Depth: 44 cm Weight: 17, 3 kg Display mode Mode Frequency maximum resolution of 640x480 117 Hz, 24-bit, millions of colors 800x600 95 Hz, 24-bit, millions of colors 1, 024x768 75 Hz, 24-bit, millions of colors The reaction to the emergence of iMac in the U.S.: "IMac - it's Christmas in August! - said Paul Ramirez, vice president of Marketing ComputerWare. "We sold over One Saturday iMac computers more than All desktop PC in July. " "IMac 'and sold the majority of our dealers this weekend," - said Steve Jobs (temporary manager (CEO) Apple). "Until next week we will launch in stores, tens of thousands iMac 's. " "IMac might be one of the most selling models at all times. When the sales process goes, may be sold several million cars, "- says Roger Kay, an analyst at IDC. Jim Helpin, executive director of chain stores CompUSA, said that sales of iMac will in history. "If this weekend we'll sell all the computers that we have it will be the best-selling iMac computer, which we have ever seen. " Representatives of the chain stores MacMall say they can not meet all orders. "We sold 1,200 units. Only this morning, "- said one of the managers Sales MacMall. In the less than five months, iMac became best-selling computer in the U.S., it was sold 800 thousand units (more than PC). About 55% of users are adherents of the old Mac, 32% first purchased a computer and 13% - the former users of "normal" PC. In Moscow, iMac 266 costs about $ 1250, iMac 333 - 1450 $. According to the test BYTEmark iMac 266 half times faster than Pentium II 450MHz, and two times than the Celeron 333MHz. In early 1999, Apple released new Mac for the professional market - Power Mac G3, the amazing buildings - a transparent plastic saturated blue and milky-white flowers, combined with faired. Inside: PowerPC G3 processor with a clock frequency of 300 -, 350 - or 400-MHz, 512 KB or 1 MB cache second level, type backside, on the processor module with a frequency of 150 -, 175 - or 200 MHz respectively depending on the speed of the processor system bus is 100 MHz Integrated co-processor for floating point operations, and 64K processor cache, the first level (32K for data and 32KB for instructions) 64 MB or 128 MB of RAM Four types of PC100 SDRAM memory expansion slot DIMM, supporting up to 1GB of memory type PC100 SDRAM, with the following DIMM'ov: 32MB, 64 MB or 128 MB (64-bit 64-bit technology) 128 MB or 256 MB (64-bit, 128-bit technology) Drives: 6GB hard drive or 12GB Ultra ATA or 9GB Ultra2 LVD SCSI card with Ultra2 LVD SCSI PCI 24-speed (maximum) CD-ROM or 5-speed (maximum) DVD-ROM with DVD-Video playback (reads CD-ROMs at 35) Zip-drive (some configurations) Place two additional Ultra ATA, UltraWide SCSI or Ultra2LVD SCSI drives Two FireWire 400 Mb / s Two-port 12-Mbps Universal Serial Bus (USB) Port Apple Desktop Bus (ADB) Built-in Ethernet 10BASE-T/100BASE-TX (RJ-45) Additionally possible to install an internal modem 56K (supports K56flex standards and V. 90) Four slots PCI: three 64-bit slots frequency of 33 MHz and one 32-bit slot with a frequency of 66 MHz allocated to Graphics Card: ATI RAGE 128 15-pin mini D-Sub VGA connector and Macintosh-VGA adapter Minijack input / output 16-bit stereo, with a frequency of 44. 1 kHz Built-in speaker Graphics Card ATI RAGE 128 16MB memory SDRAM, providing following features: 2D acceleration 128-bit internal accelerator Hardware accelerator graphics and video Supports resolutions up to 1.920 x 1.200 pixels at 32 bits per pixel (Millions of colors) 3D acceleration Advanced integrated aksellerator Single-pass processing multitexture Full 32-bit per pixel (b / n) Z buffer and 8-b / n "stencil" buffer Sustained support QuickDraw 3D RAVE and OpenGL Keyboard Apple USB Keyboard and Mouse Apple USB Mouse Power consumption (without monitor): 200W Height: 43, 2 cm Width: 22, 6 cm Depth: 46, 7 cm Weight: 13, 0 kg In tests BYTEmark computers PowerPC G3/400 more than twice faster computers Compaq Deskpro Pentium II/450. To gain access to the connectors extensions, pull the ring on the side wall of the housing and open it - all the boards are mounted directly on it. As and IMac 's no floppy drive and support SCSI. To use SCSI - devices necessary to establish an appropriate fee in one of the connectors PCI. For lovers of Notebook'ov Apple releases Powerbook: elegantly rounded shape, translucent orange-molochnobely housing. Each model comes with two built-in expansion slots (which can also be used as slots batteries), including two slots PC Card. Inside: 233, 266, or 300 MHz PowerPC G3 processor, 1MB backside level 2 cache at 266 and 300 MHz processor module, 125 or 146 MHz 64-bit backside-bus, 66 or 83 MHz system Bus. Integrated module for floating point and cache 64K level 1 on-chip (32K data and 32K instruction) or 32MB 64MB RAM; 2 x SO-DIMM, support Up to 192 MB memory, 4MB ROM. Internal 2GB, 4GB, or 8GB IDE Winchester, 2 expansion slots 3. 5 " CD-ROM or DVD-ROM and other devices Removable storage drive 3. 5 "1. 44MB memory expansion slot for 20-speed (maximum) CD-ROM for expansion slots Port Apple Desktop Bus (ADB) -SCSI-port is not less than seven peripherals -Serial (RS-422) port Port Power Adapter Built-in 10BASE-T connector Ethernet (10 Mbps) Modem RJ-11 port supports K56flex modem Infrared-(4-Mbps IrDA) -PC Card slot for two Type II PC Cards or one Type III PC Card or CardBus cards -S-video output connector -24-bit video out connector port (VGA-style connector) Sound: -16-bit CD-quality stereo input / output Video: 2MB, 4MB SGRAM, or VRAM supports millions of colors on external monitors up to 20 inches -2D/3D Graphics via an integrated video controller -Support for Zoomed Video in the lower PC Card slot Display: -14. 1-inch (diagonal) built-in display TFT XGA active-matrix supports millions of colors at resolution 1, 024h768 pixels Two built-in stereo speakers Battery: 49 Watt / hour lithium-ion. Average life: up to 3. 5 hours on one battery, up to 7 hours on two batteries under normal use Built-in full-size keyboard 76 (US) or 77 (ISO) keys, including 12 function keys Apple track pad Depth: 26. 4 cm Width: 32. 3 cm Height: 5. 1 cm; 5. 3 cm to 14. 1-inch Model Weight (depending on configuration); computer with a modem, battery and CD-ROM weighs 3, 5 kg At this while you can and finish the story about the history of Apple and Macintosh. Why so far? - Because Apple is not going to turn up today: shares on the market grows, sales iMak 's too, so much so that in some regions of the world's foremost dealers in the face - all lacking! A recently published information that the Korean firm Daewoo Telekom and its a subsidiary of Future Power PC are going to sell in packages under "IMac", Apple has already filed them in court. Looks like to make money on someone else's popularity. In the next issue will be continued and a description of new models of Power Macintosh processor G4. In the 7 th issue, I mentioned about the limit performance of silicon in the 2 GHz, according in press have misunderstood me - razyasnyayu: 2GHz - the limit for freestanding transistors, the information in 1989 for ten years, as far as I know, the situation has not changed. Started doped by different substances, to This had not previously used, the gain - A few percent of performance. When a few million transistors collected in 1 cm 2 they start to each other interfere, and work properly, they can at much lower frequency. Most importantly, the increase the clock speed is now constrained several factors: 1. Conductive path between the transistors are so close to each from a friend that there are parasitic coupling between them. 2. Each transistor has a certain input capacitance, the charge that it takes time to reduce the time carriers need to reduce the resistance of conductors (recently published "copper technology" to replace the aluminum, but it is "penny"). 3. In the process of manufacturing ICs technology less than 0, 18 micron wavelength ultraviolet radiation greater than the distance created between the tracks, out in the wavelength decreases, and this requires creation of new photographs, a source radiation, which does not exist yet. So the winner will be the one who has to crystal transistors smaller, better architecture. In this regard, Power PC exceeds the Pentium. Many have probably seen advertisement Pentium II, a sort of garbage Pobol audiotapes, and recently I decided to look in freshly bought PowerMac G3 350 MHz, in hope to see such a "miracle." Pull the for the ring, door opens, and there is visible only a small radiator 5h5h1 cm from He looks at one side of the board L2 cache in 1MBayt, the CPU itself is hidden under this board seated in the connector such as the Socket 7. The shell thickness of less than 1 CPU, 5 mm, only in the place where the crystal and the adjacent sink, the thickness is increased to 5 mm. Immediately after the release for sale Pentium III 600 MHz Intel to announce that in soon (at least until the end of the year) to increase the clock speed is not going to (come:)), and will improve the processor architecture (finally). And now about the sound. In the late 70's when there was a development with Philips and Sony standard AUDIO-CD, computers had relatively little RAM and performance of applying them in digital audio is not was the question. Nobody thought then about sampling frequency, and that after 6 years appear based on this technology synthesizers sound. Therefore, the standard 44100 has been taken from the ceiling (almost). True were isolated cases of otsifrovok: firm Roland in 1982 released a rhythm box TR-808, using analog and digital sound synthesis, sound of drums created an analog generators, all plates were recorded in the ROM in the digital code. The frequency of 44,100 to digitize and clean subsequent playback, fits, and for use in synthesizers are not altogether, as it requires to create evenly tempered scale of large computational resources. In prinipe it explains why it took so much years before engineers turned their eyes on this technology. By the mid-80's power of computers grew, and there the first sampling, with pleerami. Taken as a basis for derivatives and 44,100 - 22050, 11025, etc. Perhaps this contributed to the software used to create AUDIO-CD, or the fact that the first samples intended for scoring games, but not playing music, and sampling rate did not play a big role. Since then, 44,100 - standard. But this applicable to machines with tens of hundreds of MHz and the ILO. But what about the things we on SPECCY? Two years, there is a General Sound, but during this time he did not become standard. It is unlikely that this contributed high price of fees is likely bolnstvu people turned out to not need an old technology in 1985. In the previous issue introduced a new 8-bit 4-channel map with direct access to 's capacity - a good alternative to General Sound, at least not a "black box" and most can be assembled (according to the scheme will cost 2 times less GS). But how seen from the description, there are glitches, and to again, in 1985. Fantasy-that whether people are missing? Fixated on a single the same. Now the frequency output in GS, with a side of drawn frequency 37, 5 kHz? It is not clear. Could not squeeze out more? All world tends to parallelize the computation, here - again go its own way (all saddled on the Z80). In the MIRACLE # 3 someone Dmitry suggested that what is sold in GS limit for an 8-bit audio. For the GS is probably the limit, but not for an 8-bit audio. First, a little theory. How many have already noticed, Speck rather the optimal machine. When you create a sound card, you must also use the "highlight", rather than trying to just copy the old stuff. Regarding the use of samples for scoring game, everything is clear - the effect is lost and all. But when you create a melody better if the samples could loop to a certain place, and how much to lose. Every sound has 4 phases: attack, decline, support and damping. At each of the They can organizavat cycle and modulate the amplitude of all this, the sample will be very short, but it takes a lot of calculations. They can be reduced through proper organization of cycles. Cycle should be multiple of 2 ^ x bytes, for example: 256, 512, 1024 etc. (in the calculation of addresses Jr. byte is ignored). This in turn will impose some restrictions on the period, it must be exactly 2 "X bytes. There still some nuances, but I still miss them. To get the music needs a table division factor. Better if they are integral and odnobaynymi. There are some factors that have very small error, they are also called "magic" (read more about it in "RADIO" 1990, No. 3, p. 63). In Once I trying to collect odnogolosy digital synthesizer of "Moog" on Z80, decided to calculate the coefficients of frequency division. Armed with a calculator, plunged into the calculation, in about 2 weeks I found a single-byte series of numbers, which provides the minimum error. The next day, leafing through the "Radio" I stumble on the above article - I calculated the numbers were "the magic" 2 weeks "down the drain! :) Synthesizer was received with great systems. In view of samples 2 ^ X and "Magic" of the coefficients for system, where the La 1 octave = 440 Hz, the estimated frequency of O = 21,973 Hz. At the same time the resulting "average" system will be as same as natural. This frequency is not unique, there are other with the difference between the nearest 2 ^ (1 / 12). In the application of 21,973 Hz, all at the top srezhutsya sound, with a linear transformation it will be noticeable. But there is a way of nonlinear transformation, where high frequency is better preserved and less distorted (it is described in detail "RADIO" 1991 number 11 (page 48) and 12 (P. 47): "... for music signals maximum power is reduced to 6 dB one octave, starting at 2 ... 4 kHz. Therefore, if the device used LPF 1-th order with a cutoff frequency equal to 2 ... 4 kHz, while the conversion and will come with the rise of frequencies above 2 ... 4 kHz at 6 dB per octave, it will not cause an overload at higher frequencies, but will significantly improve the quality of the conversion. "Producers various sound equipment because and increase the sampling rate and bit depth that using a linear transformation, and only this can save sound quality. Once I gathered the nonlinear converter is described in the magazine and used as the ADC-DAC reverb with a bit depth 10 bits. Conducted tests in his home studio, one of those musicians who heard, no one said bad things about the sound quality: noise mixer and amp reverb turned out to be more noise, hear the noise of the reverb, I was able to only on a professional pulte Mackie 2002, which has a SNR 106 dB. In my opinion, this converter is the signal to noise ratio is not less than 70 dB. At a frequency of 40 kHz in comparison with the original misstatement was not, a 25 bit reduced the top, but overall quality was quite high. All these technical wisdom and should be used when creating a sound card. Something I did not tell, but it already in next time.
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 21 November