* * *
Despite this, most ufologists
are confident that the government has the ability to
extensive data bank on UFOs and secretly pro-
owes research. Their confidence increased
drunk on the fact that American intelligence
institutions under pressure from public
tvennosti published some documents
you, showing that they accumulated in-
UFO formation, which is still classified
is listed as top secret. Rules
The government does not allow public access to
these documents, despite numerous
new attempts by researchers to see them,
the Freedom of Information Act, which
allows American citizens to obtain
any government document disclosed
the execution of which does not threaten the national
security.
In response to the government's reluctance to
to publish documents, the group of ufologists "Na-
terrestrial UFO surveillance" began legal
action to declassify documents about the surveillance
UFO sightings on military bases in the 1970s
duh. After "Ground Surveillance"
for UFO" suffered financial difficulties, for
another organization "Citizens" took over the case
against secrecy around UFOs." Although
"Citizens against secrecy around UFOs"
argued that the publication of the official
UFO information cannot cause damage
national security, american
secret institutionsclaimed that it was
will jeopardize their operations. Even when
yes, ufologists emphasized what interests them
only information on UFOs and nothing related -
with American security, government
the government flatly refused to release information
mation. Ultimately, a federal judge
Gerhardt Hessel at a closed meeting
shared the concerns of the secret services regarding the
do national security. Ufologists op-
protested the decision, claiming that they had heard
tion was dishonest. In particular, the group
indicated that the judge was not allowed to simply
watch materials, despite the fact that
the judge had every right to do so. Actually
ki, Judge Gessel received only a general
explanation why the government can't
make documents public. These extensive
explanations and served as the basis for his
making a decision. Although Citizens Against Sex
jealousy around UFOs" could not win
business, the organization continues to work, that-
would receive the desired documents according to the "Law
on freedom of information." [22]
During the Blue Book and Colo-
glad", as well as during the work of the commission
Robertson in 1953, the US Air Force repeatedly
but were convinced that UFO sightings
can only fuel pointless debates about
about “whether they exist or not” when pro-
UFO activists and supporters have the most
rum of approximately equivalent arguments for and
vs. In recent years, similar
the waters becameeven the most stubborn come
UFO supporters. So, an authoritative American
Kanye ufologist Raymond Fowler in one of
of his works he writes: “From my point of view,
non-governmental UFO research
whether in a dead end. I must admit that a lot
summer investigations and descriptions of some and
the same types of unexplained events have become
a routine and frustrating task...
Photographs, sampling and soil sampling,
as well as the search for other evidence of the existence
UFO stories are for researchers
a side form of activity... They are lagging behind
bad methodology does not produce much
impressions on scientists." At the same time he
states: "I have come to the conclusion that the research
research has been going on for many decades
ties and that the result of these large-scale
The most important work was obtaining physical evidence
evidence that UFOs are ships from
other worlds, but official bodies do not
know where UFOs come from and why they
appear." [22] [24]
Does the US have extraterrestrial technology?
remains a controversial issue for now. If the source
ria of the Roswell disaster is right-
doi, then the answer to this question is positive
telny and the American government has
opportunity to study alien technology
gyu since 1947. Could the United States
you understand and use this technology -
another question. One of the researchers
suggested that a boomerang-shaped UFO,observed in the mid-1980s in
Hudson Valley, New York, was over-
xsecret American aircraft type
"stealth" based on UFO technology [4].
Further research is needed to
prove or disprove this hypothesis.
───────────────────── ─────────────────────
Literature
──────────
1. 1978 MUFON UFO Symposium Proceedings. -
Seguin, TX: MUFON, 1978.
2. 1981 MUFON UFO Symposium Proceedings. -
Seguin, TX: MUFON, 1981.
3. Berlitz, Charles and Moore, William L.
The Roswell Incident. - New York, N.Y.:
Berkley Publishing Corporation, 1980.
4. Carey, Thomas J. Is it true a UFO with
aliens on board crashed and was
recovered by the United States
military? - Chicago, IL: CUFOS, 1996.
5. Fowler, Raymond Casebook of a UFO
Investigator. A Personal Memoir. -
N.J., 1981.
6. Government Records: Results of a Search
for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash
Near Roswell. New Mexico. - Wash.,
1995. [Letter Report, 07/28/95;
GAO-NSIAD-95-187]
7. Jeffrey, Kent Time for the true about
Roswell. - Chicago, IL: CUFOS, 1994.
8. Marrs, Jim Crossfire. - N.Y., 1989.
9. Randle, Kevin and Schmitt, Donald The
Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell. -
N.Y., 1994.
10. Ruppelt, Edward J. The Report on
Unindentified Flying Objects. - Garden
City, N.Y.: Doubleday & Company, Inc.,
1956.
11. Stringfield, Leonard H. UFO
Crash/Retrievals Syndrom, Status
Report II. - Seguin, TX: MUFON, 1980.
12. Stringfield, Leonard H. UFO
Crash/Retrievals: The Inner Sanctum,
Status Report VI. - Cincinnati, July,
1991.
13. Stringfield, Leonard H. UFO
Crash/Retrievals: Search for Proof in
a Hall of Mirrors, Status Report VII.
- Cincinnati, February, 1994.
14. "The New York Times", 4.07.1947.
15. "The New York Times", 7.07.1947.
16. "The New York Times", 8.07.1947.
17. "The New York Times", 9.07.1947.
18. "The New York Times", 11.07.1947.
19. "The New York Times", 12.07.1947.
20. "The New York Times", 13.07.1947.
21. Unindentified Aerial Objects. Project
"Sign". Technical Report No
F-TR-2274-1a. - Dayton, OH:
Wright-Patterson AFB, 1949.
22. UFOs: Q`s & A`s. - Chicago, IL: CUFOS,
1992.
23. Weaver R. Report of Air Force Research
Regarding the "Roswell Incident". -
Washington, D.C.: Department of
Defense, July 1994.
24. Vasiliev V.S., Spichkin V.A. Inter-
Are anti-gravity secrets being shared in the USA?
tions? // USA: economics, politics,
ideology. - 1990. - No. 4.
25. Vasiliev V.S. Henceforth to be called: opera-
tion "Majestic-12". // USA: economics,
politics, ideology. - 1991. - No. 7.
26. Vasiliev V.S. The mystery of the crash near Ro-
Zuell: 50 years later. // USA: economic
politics, ideology. - 1996. -
No. 10.
27. Tsebakovsky S. Search for emergency UFOs. //
We. - 1991. - No. 9,10. - 1992. - No. 8.
Searchemergency UFOs. // We. - 1991. -
No 9,10. - 1992. - No. 8.
───────────────────────────────────DI:HALT
Share your thoughts about the article