Buzz #17
10 апреля 1999 |
|
Viewpoint - On writing Softa for the Spectrum.
(C) Eraser / Delirium Tremens'98 Then came Dead Mazai and took them all ... Now on stage with Spectrum we see the manifestation of a large interest demam ... So what are some to become famous for the whole country (and this is one of the main incentives for writing prog on Speccy), begin writing demuliny. I understand that this interesting and exciting process. But there is another, negative side. That's it-and makes alarming. First, the falling interest in writing more than necessary prog, rather than demos. Secondly, it is a consequence of the first - leaving users of the small number of new, and at that, they, the software (for example, on Spectrum and no normal editor. Yes, there is MicroEditor, iS-Editor, but they have very large disabilities). So, ladies and gentlemen demomeykery not it be better to write rulny text editor than figachit regular chankovy effect, huh?? Or do you think the user when cleaning your disks, erase any TextED not your Sux4Brain??? Also, the main argument for writing a dem and what is now conducted in a large number of Demo-Party (FunTop, ArtComp, Constructions of Chaos, and more. Mn. Etc.). There proposal to organize these parties;) also Soft-Compo, where will be exhibiting at the show a different software. But that's only unclear how to assess them?? Probably just as well as demos: * Registration; * The complexity of creating, as well as: * Interface; * Convenience; * And much more. This assessment will be the best advertisement for the bend. Consequently, it would be better to buy and, therefore, be an incentive for its further development, or writing a new one. P.S. So organizers of party should consider this. If you have your thoughts on this topic, then a kilo Bytes Buzz'a at your disposal. P.P.S. I am not against DEMOSTROENIYA as it might to some yet zatsya.
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 21 November