Inferno #04
22 июня 2003 |
|
Events - On completion of the first part of a virtual musical party The Compo.
The Compo: about fast results Room dedicated to the end of the first part of the virtual musical The Compo. One may agree that the idea failed, as well as all our previous ideas to work with the masses (vpomnim 128 bytes intros compo). Such a hefty survey found the strength to fill only a few sverhlyudey.Togda as occurred in about the same time of the census Respect with a much longer questionnaire scored most of these questionnaires. Well, quite logical. The second part of the components of the questions (Very unpopular) would be eliminated. Sm.spisok. The Compo, though being a joke party, is actually quite a serious project. It has long been assumed to appreciate all that already attained over the years in art AY / YM, prioritize and pay creators according to merit (sm.spisok) The biggest prize for any creator is the recognition of his work. Not so important that surveyed should not vote outcome, the authors list, and on own work - the result will be not less than tochen.Dazhe more accurate and nepredvzyat.Imena, which is spinning in the rumor, in the first place would fall to the winners, whether the alignment of voting standard. The more so because the vote for such layouts is regularly project ZX-Chart, why again? A lot of nonsense, I dashed off now:) but it's nothing, I have nowhere to go, do not write, Journal of the results will come, Nik-O I live eat, so I did not write it, read on: P What kind of prize can there be? It is assumed that we will go to the store - and buy ... uh-uh ... what? RADIODETAL? souvenir? CDROM? (Fu) or ptsshnuyu chemin de fer? (Shame) But a diploma, I hope it will! Treaty, perhaps, to himself, that the diploma itself, I will not print:) There was nakladochka rule representation works on konkurs.V principle, being "By all users", we, the organizers can put on the contest of any stranger track. AND not even one. But it turns out that we are likely to shift in the desired direction of our future results of the vote, what are the results we, the organizers, on the contrary I would like to see in the uncomplicated form! : Other rules are, in principle, justified themselves. The principle of "to understand the nomination in his own way, without asking, I think is fair. The fact of installing the i-th operation of j-th points and should be (a fact, should) influence is state of the universe in relation to work And as her correspondence nomination and professionally, and memorability, and the prevalence of, finally. The principle of "vote for any number of works" is justified by the definition, then I have no one to talk sense:) The principle of "count himself a composer whether or not the composer "has allowed the organizers to avoid responsibility for an incorrect definition of the essence of each composer's voters. This is not "Elite rezults", which is gaining zhyurey unknown and who knows what:) The principle of "write that he did not remember we remember ourselves, "I hope that does not explain not! (But had fun;) It is a pity that not the whole truth about the mechanics of the above came in the rules, laziness was, and now still interesting, rightly or wrongly understood us there, on the other side of the screen? Organizers
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 21 November