***PO Box 153 ****************************************************
Alexander BACHILO (Novosibirsk):
Dear Sergey and Andrey!
Thank you very much for the magazine, I’m eager to receive it with all my heart and
henceforth. It's been a long time since I've come across such an invigorating read - like one...
However, you professionally managed to hook the brothers-liter-
rators! At some point I wanted to remove the rusty one myself.
saber from the wall, run up on tiptoe and slash at the previous one
to the speaker. But, firstly, the range of opinions expressed is already sufficient.
definitely wide, and secondly, he inspires a certain restraint
fact that as the debate progresses, the number of
writers outraged by each other. It gets to the point where someone
someone is already promising not to shake hands.
This is in vain, by God. Controversy on the pages of the magazine, of course, well-
wife Disputes about tastes, clashes of ambitions - all this is very cute and
fascinating, but often, in the midst of literary struggle, I want
shout from the seat: “And livestock farming!”
Because it's not serious. What kind of literary struggle is there? What
fighting mechanism? In mutual abuse? In fruitless attempts to
castrate your opponent? Nothing ever comes of it
it won't work out. Competition is also not a method. None of the domestic
national science fiction writers was not defeated by other domestic science fiction writers
in the course of competition. No one, including the authors of the WTO. Who, when
andwith what works did he defeat the Lukins, Loginov, Vershinin, that
Lyonka Kudryavtseva? It’s just that Vitaly Pishchenko has now chosen a different one
a form of prosperity probably less troublesome than his previous one
personal brainchild - WTO. And he wants to shake the old days, publish
domestic authors, and I assure you - you will have a WTO again.
It turns out he can’t beat Stolyarov in competition - Andrey
People read Mikhailovich. I read it myself. Here's Edgar Rice Burroughs
can fail both. And Harry Harrison mows down the non-
there is little publishing space. But it’s no fun to quarrel with these -
It's hard to quarrel. However, people have already written about them before me.
Now seriously. I’m for discussion. I’m for arguing until you’re hoarse and swearing.
with the addition of abusive epithets. But I am against mortal insults
at each other. Against, if you like, an overly serious attitude
contributions to this discussion. It’s not a cow we’re losing. No bonuses
even the most prestigious ones are not worth fighting over
good writers (or, for example, good with bad - that will be
Absolutely beating up babies).
The press should take special care here -
public mouthpiece. Usually writers, publishers and fans come to
heading to the next con, having already gotten pretty bored without each other,
forgetting last year's quarrels. It is impossible for a magazine controversy to take place in absentia
made them enemies or kept them in a state of hostility.
That's why I first of allI wish to help your magazine rather than
prevent writers, publishers, fans - all the people in our circle -
give a hand to each other.
Best regards, A. Bachilo. 27.9.9
* * *
Alan Kubatiev (Beshkek):
Dear Sergey! Dear Andrey!
First of all, I want to say that, obviously, with old age comes
hostility to all kinds of fan riots and noise, inappropriate
wine drinking (I approve of it), and I’ve never liked fans.
That is why Interpresscon-94 warmed me and caressed me: I’ll say
Honestly, I didn’t believe that the things that were patiently closed in ’93
eyes were shining, it might simply not be there in ’94. Understanding what work and
what costs are behind this, I express my deep gratitude to everyone
and faith in success.
Now to the main thing. It seems to me that the emphasis on the main thing is still
was not done. We practically did not remember that science fiction
- this is LITERATURE and it develops according to the laws of literature. Arch-
Diy Natanych, peace be upon him, said at one of Maleevka that our
literature is the best we have. But literature is, unfortunately,
Leniya, also a reader. God, how good it would be without him! Therefore
no matter how beautiful "The Bronze Snail" and "The Wanderer" are, the award
Interpresscona seems to me more important than all the others - for now. I need to-
It seems that voting does not determine everything. It seems to me that many
things end up out of vote or being picked upsmall quantity
points for a very simple reason: THEY WERE NOT READ.
This is not the first time that many of those who vote at the con have
they give it there and know that they will get there again. Now I address them:
Gentlemen, comrades-in-arms, you were invited for this reason, so that you would appreciate
everything or almost everything that happened in the literature of our species during this
year! Find and read at any cost and think about how
point of view, you will appreciate all this. Whether you like or dislike the author,
whether it is boring or not boring to read it - an excellent position, comfortable and
not burdensome. But there is also a more serious and qualified
approach: WHAT'S NEW? WHY IS THIS BETTER?
I don’t hope to approach the future con sufficiently prepared and prepared.
I’m in a terrible hurry to get everything just before the ballot (for example,
I’ll go, even if they don’t invite you!!!), but I’ll definitely do it. But
in Russia it is much easier...
The fact that Roma Arbitman generously scatters her products and fruits
before the vote is more important for victory than it
undoubted talent - I love Arbitman, but I don’t like his desire
receive a medal.
It’s very good that there was a discussion before the ballot. Plo-
xo, she's so helpless.
It’s very good that there are more bonuses. Over time, one of them
will still become the main one, like “Hugo” or “Nebula”. For now let
are fighting.
I don’t quite understand yet what “Wanderer” is, but I’m glad I don’t
witnessed the scandal anddispleasure. I regret that on fashion models
didn't look; but I want to say that the one who calls the tune calls the
tit. Somehow we all will not learn to remember that if the founder gives
award, then he has such a right, and it’s funny to let out fountains here.
Writers have the same right to fight for ideals - although for me
It’s better to write well and thereby prove that your ideals, con-
those dressed with talent are more effective than others. There is no need to argue about personal
we have to argue on the merits. They have already called me “mirot-
a thief" - yes, I am a peacemaker. It hurts me to see after I
I’ll cross several borders and change several currencies, my dears,
in my heart the people whom it costs me dear to see will boil over
for unimportant and stupid reasons. In addition, I advise you to remember that
It was the “Peacemaker” that was the name of the first Colt model.
I don’t care at all what system is used to vote
tion. But it was unpleasant for me to see how B.N. made excuses to
he told me in great detail and in mathematical detail how this is done -
he, not the counter. Majestic B.N. people need it more. I give you my teeth.
Let me remind you again - more about literature!!! Correctly said
one of the jury members of “The Wanderer”: “Guys, you’re sharing here, scolding-
Be careful, and I’m consoling you all, because I know that I’m a writer
times!.." The more we are busy with literature, the less
there is no time for nonsense. There is a lot in Sasha Shchegolev’s article that I
I sympathize,but I want to remind you that you cannot take someone else’s place. If
a person can replace the living God, so so be it. If
If he can’t, he’ll slip while sitting.
Andrey Karapetyan was the best - he didn’t quarrel with anyone, he was happy
he has enjoyed life and draws wonderfully. That's all. Thank you guys
that you hold on, remember me and gain ratings.
Always yours Alan Kubatiev
* * *
Vasily ZVYAGINTSEV (Stavropol):
Hello, Andrey and Sergey!
In relation to the "Wanderer", without being an eyewitness and an accomplice,
rather ready to join the “dissidents”. Without questioning
I cannot understand the subjective honesty of the founders and nominators
overcome the feeling that such things should be done
otherwise. Or expand the circle of the jury to limits that exclude reproaches
groupism, or... Otherwise there is no way to get rid of the vision: “L.I.
Brezhnev awards himself another Star." And, as I understand it, the same
opinions of a number of other comrades. It seems to me that moral damage laurea-
Comrade here is more serious than the pleasure of a figurine. But in the end
In the end, I can take your point of view: “What should I do?” If
it just happened that way. I drink on my own, I go out on my own.
A. Legos described the situation with “Snail” quite accurately and aptly.
Taev. A certain picture emerges, and it doesn’t get you anywhere.
get away. A master is a master, and what can I say if his pets are
andlike-minded people, ethical and aesthetic? Again I referred to
adjectival mood, but if Arkady Natanovich in this case
participated, the result could have been different. I knew him well, then
time with B.N. practically unknown...
Without getting carried away with a detailed analysis of Stolyarov’s report (although I say
there is something to note) I would like to note that I almost completely agree with the point of view -
Niya Shchegolev. Indeed, from the first acquaintance with Stolyarov I
I noticed in him both exorbitant conceit and a certain messianism. And chi-
melting from time to time his interview-type rants in
"MEGE", I was surprised how easily he uses it in his own
address superlatives. Even in Bolshevik times, not every
dy Literary General so unceremoniously took on the role of "leading
and guide." It’s a pity that I didn’t hear L. Vershinin’s speech, but
I can guess what he might have said. No matter how highly you value yourself
yourself and those close to you, declarations of this kind are heard
ugly, and you involuntarily begin to think whether it is too impassable
the line between those who write “highly artistically” and those who
known to be branded.
At least, even at WTO seminars such categorical statements
I didn’t hear any comments. And Shchegolev, accordingly, is a great guy in that regard -
It was clearly not easy for Tanova to tell him what he said.
The other two Stavropol science fiction writers, Panasko and Pidorenko,
They think the same. Although these are here for uscapital games as well
abstract, like the Moscow “battle of the titans” used to be. But in case
what...
In conclusion, I convey my greetings to Sidorovich personally. In vain
He's torturing himself so much. Even such a responsible event as
"Interpresscon" must be conducted in such a way that if you call
two-digit number, then “02” is better than “03”.
Please accept the assurances of our utmost respect.
Vasily Zvyagintsev * * *
Alexander OLEKSENKO (St. Petersburg)
ANDREY NIKOLAEV
(to the editor and the person)
An extremely open letter
Dear A. Nikolaev!
Taking into account the high ideological and political level of Va-
publications, I consider it my duty to point out completely unacceptable
timely, but still admitted by you negligence of a technical nature
tera (calm down, Andryusha, I’m not talking about that),
namely:
widespread use of symbol combinations g. and mr (as well as
Mr., Mr. etc).
Since the foundations of worldview are formed in childhood, which
the period for most of your readers fell on the era of domination
"comrade", as an expression of the dominant Bolshevik
ideologies,
and also remembering those, as a rule, difficult living conditions and
often unfavorable social climate that accompanied the mentioned
that formation (which is entirelynearby entailed close and
detailed acquaintance with very specific forms of addressing
interlocutor),
I must admit frankly - yes, I haven’t had time yet
the recently arrived era of the triumph of the new (renewed? well-
old everyday life?) eradicate morality from our burdened complex-
the subconscious itself is all remnants of the dark past
and introduce there the healthy sprouts of a new, good “tomorrow”, found
giving a comprehensive reflection in a beautiful, noble word
"master", has long been accepted throughout the civilized world as a non-
an integral component of cultural and respectful communication.
And one can only welcome the desire of the overwhelming number
those writing to you and for you address their opponents in exactly this way;
but it is still necessary to realize that
maybe, maybe there will be some vile character who, by virtue of
mental defects caused by bad heredity, separation
created fantasy, brought up by the worst examples of the tabloid
literature, or acquired habit of seeing everything
to inflict the abomination that arose as a result of an incessant hangover -
to whom (taking into account the highly polemical orientation,
characteristic of most of your materials) when you see “g.” and
"Mr" will certainly come to mind completely different words than
the author meant.
I can’t resist bringing someone I already love
many quote fromA. Stolyarova: “...they should subconsciously feel
say goodbye..."
(It’s especially offensive for the second reduction also because it’s so
its blasphemous interpretation is possible only because of incorrect information
initially, but unfortunately, the established reading of the corresponding
term of foreign origin.)
At the same time, regarding “Ms.,” it will probably save and much more
a more sophisticated fantasy than, say, mine, although there is probably
what to think about...
But at the same time, however, I would like to draw your attention to the fact
that all these problems can certainly be avoided, and without any special
efforts, by completely replacing all reductions of this kind with
popular words that do not allow any discrepancies -
using any text editor, which, according to reliable
information at your disposal, -
thereby preventing any (even hypothetical) possibility
the danger of introducing an element of communal-kitchen squabble into an already
an exceptionally intense battle of wits.
Entirely your humble servant
Shura Oleksenko
P.S.
I was going to offer similar considerations at one time
to the attention of my deeply respected (Mr.) Chertkov, editor
the widely known "INTERCOM",
(in which I was particularly impressed - from the point of view
in view of the above - responded to lettersread-
lei),
but, unfortunately, this venerable magazine quietly slammed its boots,
and therefore these notes (and some others that have less general
character) is not destined to see the light of day on its pages;
I still hope that with your, dear sir, help
the modest fruits of my thoughts will be available to my dearest
A. Chertkov, and not only him.
* *
NIKOLAY ROMANETSKY (St. Petersburg):
VOICE FROM THE SWAMP
It’s still useful, damn it, to get acquainted with the materials dedicated to
at the con, at which you had the honor of being in a reduced mode -
presence.
After all, the time during which they tolerate you there - and in the old days -
commercial contribution to turn out to be a legal order, the guts are thin, - ho-
I want to spend it communicating with people I haven’t seen for a whole year.
And you won’t see as much - if they let you in next time... So
that on this day you need to have time to attend the “Snail” award ceremony, and
dine for free, and sit at a concert of an original song, and with
the guards won't get into trouble when they won't let you in without a "collar"
into the body. And time to have a drink with old friends, os-
Not much is hidden. And then Andrei Nikolaev pesters -
You see, you also need to register at the report, show up for the organizers
provide. So you say to Nikolaev: I’m sorry, Andryusha, in a
bu I saw your reports, let those who are here all the time go to themweek-
Liu will spend it, and if there is anything interesting there, it’s still later
they will tell you, in general, you understand me...
And so it happened that I learned about the beginning of a new literary war.
cash only from the Oberham issue dedicated to Sidorkon-94,
after reading the abstracts of Andrei Stolyarov’s report “Rules of the game without rules”
pitchfork (experience of literary war)" and Alexander Shchego’s response to them
Leva "Against means contra (May theses)."
However, the author cannot fly past the announcement of hostilities
for the first time. I remember back in late 1988-early 1989 at one of the
seminars Yura Fleishman gave me to read those same paragraphs from that
the very “Proteus” of that same Medvedev. I read it in good faith
I didn’t understand anything (fool!), but just in case it’s thoughtful
said: “Wow...” A little later everything was explained to me (me too
was then his own, for he went under the tutelage of Andrei Mikhailovich Stol-
Rova) and offered to get into formation. But I couldn’t stand building yet
from the time of studying at the military department of his native polytechnic, and even military
I don't like actions. And then he dared to remain on his own
on the other side...That’s probably why I appear as a member of Sidorcon
just for one day.
So it does not surprise me that interested parties are no longer
hands are offered to Sasha Shchegolev. It is not surprising that “work has begun
by spreading rumors." I myself was surprised at one time
I learned that the catchphrase is attributed to me:"There are a lot of seminars, and
there is only one life" - a phrase that I, with my eternal desire to remain
away from any battles, I just couldn’t pronounce it. So, who-
then he said it for me.
However, enough about myself. Let us turn to the abstracts of the respected report-
driver (in order not to take up printed space, I will only outline the
battles).
Firstly, it seems to me that the WTO lost the battle by no means
to the one who relied on dullness. The WTO collections published
works of a considerable number of authors who have no origin
wearing to the Young Guard direction. These are Lukins and Dalia
Truskinovskaya, and Lyudmila Kozinets, and Sergei Ivanov, and Brider with
Chadovich, and Leonid Kudryavtsev - the list goes on. Secondly
ry, the WTO collapsed solely for two reasons: a) its leadership
the state lacked flexibility when regional branches of the organization
reached out to a certain degree of business independence; b) for bad luck
The WTO collapsed the USSR.
By the way, such a powerful publishing company as the Minsk "Eri-
given" in a sense, originated in the depths of the WTO and grew on the ob-
the breakdown of its western regional office.
Now about the fact that “war is the normal state of literature.”
Here I must agree with the distinguished speaker, but in my opinion
look, the point here is not at all about artistry and dullness. Source
any war is an inherent human desire for dominance, be it
then economic, be itpolitical, be it intellectual
mu. And the current situation in post-Soviet science fiction is due to
also the social state of society. The old domineering literary
These structures have disappeared, and in their place inevitably (these are the laws of
social development - emptiness is always disastrous) must come
others. And therefore, there will be those who want it - a holy place is not empty
it happens. And there is no need for sly talk about artistry and literature.
rational distancing.
Moreover, the author’s ideas about artistry (according to
at least based on the text of the report) seem very strange.
Of course, if we consider only the description to be highly artistic
experiences of “ours” who are oppressed by “not ours”, then where
before them, the feelings and emotions of Terem Hart rem ir Estraven, gained
destined to love sometimes like a woman, sometimes like a man! I would like to visit
the speaker in the shoes of those unfortunate people who, despite any obstacles
change their gender.
By the way, in the good old 19th century there lived a fairly authoritative
composer who called P.I. Tchaikovsky is dull and a hack, but
who has now even heard the name of that composer?.. And nothing is surprising
valid: writer is a posthumous title, none of us (as if
no matter how hard we try) it is not possible to know even our own fate, not to mention
about the fate of our works.
Well, how does the respected Andrei Mikhailovich propose to distinguish
good work from bad? Yeah, methodindependent expert
PS, yeah, authoritative Expert Council. And then he offers
honor of such an Expert Council of the jury of the Wanderer Prize, not even
noticing that he is being substituted with this sentence. It can be done in different ways
treat the jury members (I, for example, respect all these literary
rov and their creativity), but the jury members (for the most part) are not
by no means can they be called independent. So this is an opinion
group representing only one direction in science fiction, and
This opinion cannot claim to be comprehensive, just as it cannot
The award itself also claims to be comprehensive.
What follows are theses about the inevitability of a literary war. Not-
that something similar was instilled in me back in the days when I was green
newbie, looked with delight into the mouth of everyone who had at least one
publication. Then I went to Dubulti and was surprised to find that
no one puts mines in my bed or pours poison into my mind
flax, and with the representative of the main enemy army, Muscovite Anto-
Mr. Molchanov (Ant Skalandis) we even walked peacefully along
frozen snowless beach of Jurmala. Much later, in an unexpected
snow-covered Yalta, I was convinced that the “seasoned ve-te-oshnik” Bachilo
- quite a pleasant person to talk to. And then I realized that the military
actions are inevitable between those who strive for power, and everything remains
soldiers participate in these fights either out of stupidity or because of
zagfate. However, a little later it dawned on me that
ines can be liberating (you see, the author skipped the corresponding
presenting lectures on diamat. Or is it from the Institute of History and Mathematics?), which was
the war of new science fiction with the Young Guard. But with whom do I collect-
Are you ready to fight for freedom now, dear speaker? And if not for
freedom, then there is no point in fooling the fandom - I personally, for example,
I don’t see any enemies in the area. And in the distance too. Bad people
yes. Bad writers too. But there is a direct relationship between the two
I don’t understand these concepts. That’s why I wouldn’t like it,
if only bad writers had led me forward. But I wouldn’t have even more
I liked it if my guides were bad people.
By the way, who will divide people into good and bad? If the one
who cares nothing to casually insult a person, then I’d rather
make friends with the “bad” people: in the worst case, they’ll hit you when you’re drunk, but in the morning
they themselves will come running to apologize, and the guilty head, as you know, and the sword
doesn't cut.
And then - why fight? During the times of socialist realism they fought for
privileges. All we can do (for now, at least) is fight
for printed space with English-language wild cards and dishes. But, apparently, with
We have no guts to fight them. It’s easier with your own people - both close and
No special talent required.
So, gentlemen literary hawks, for God's sake, don't call me
into the trenches.
However, if you look at life from the Bolshevik point of viewvision,
then the main thing is to create the Cheka. At least just in case. Contra something
there will always be.
I know that people like me are called “swamp” in politics. I know and
the fact that among the “swamp” there are those ready to engage in battle, but not
those who have yet chosen which side to fight on. Don’t rush to choose, let’s-
we will remain in the “swamp”.
I remain on the final points of Andrei Mikhailovich’s report.
I won’t pour in - they follow from the thesis about the inevitability of life
terrorist war. I just want to say that I don’t understand where we are
must compete with realistic literature. In realism
characters? But without this, good fiction doesn’t exist. Or
try to take away realistic literature's prizes?.. Well-
Are they good for us? Isn’t it a secret that these prizes are often awarded
are given for purely political reasons? Let's be better
take care of the prestige and reputation of their own - both old and
new - bonuses. And organizing the next literary battles for
power, remember that the generals win, but the soldiers die.
Otherwise, the victory might not become Pyrrhic!
I read what was written above and was confused: they were too fantastic
wishes to come true. And that's right...
Chu!.. Again the scorched horses breathe greedily, again they knock on the
steel hooves rejoicing at the asphalt. It's the Bolsheviks galloping
cast iron horsemen, intending to lift me to a new literary
get-together. Won't I get up?..02.07.94 St. Petersburg
Nick. Romaniecki
* * *
Evgeniy FILENKO (Perm):
Dear sirs.
I hope no one is seriously interested in my opinion about the latter
Scandal. Moreover, my colleagues are more pissy and less lazy.
Legs have already said almost everything. Yes, I don’t know that many smart people
words, how many are both high sides drawn into civil strife. Besides
However, I am very little concerned with problems like: who deserves what for whom and why
will give, and also who will not shake what from whom in a confrontation. Obviously,
I have long and far gone from the pressing concerns and interests of the fandom, so
that I can observe and read about everything that is happening only out of curiosity
a natural scientist.
I can only say that I previously knew Mr. Stolyarov, no matter how
th writer. As was evident from his speech from the throne, he also discussed
shared and with any significant intelligence. Alas, for the people three-
Buna is now more of a virtue.
I also note that half is always less than the whole. And how
all civilized humanity, raised and infused with creativity
you A. and B. Strugatsky, I also cannot help but note the beneficial
impact on mine - and on all of the above-mentioned humanity! -
becoming a person and a citizen of such immortal productions
Deniya, like "Doctor Aibolit" and "Ryaba Hen". What does not follow
that these worksshould be immediately canonized in the form
gospels. And their authors should be ranked among the saints, and even more so as divine
you in the flesh. Zeus, if you remember, was usually incarnated in the home
cattle and spoiled peasant women. Angels descended to earth approximately
for the same thing.
Therefore, I am not surprised, but rather saddened by the discovery that a)
I have already hopelessly outgrown the books of my childhood, not excluding my love
the beloved "Ugly Swans"; b) if the whole (A.N. + B.N.) was saved by the Russians
fiction both in general and in particular - and my first
book including, then half (B.N.) tries it, fiction,
castrate with sheep shears and thereby deprive the ability to
self-reproduction. Maybe God to him, Boris Natanovich,
judge. But to me, a witness to the overthrow of so many idols, specifically for
this individual idol would be insulted.
As for the actual prizes, then, imbued with white envy of
to the crowned and honored gentlemen, this very hour I established and handed over
personally a global prize for the best work of all time and
peoples in the fantasy genre (I don’t remember the name), which had a material
military form of a bottle of beer. Which I drank immediately. Which everyone
I wish.
Sincerely yours Evgeniy Filenko. 09.16.199
* * *
N. Rezanova (N. Novgorod):
N. PERUMOV, I AM INDIFFERENT TO YOU
"My novel should be compared... with "Sick of Rings"N. Perumov. Letter to N. Rezanova, June 1994
"...we're looking for a fight and we want it."
A. Nikolaev. Letter to N. Rezanova, June 1994
I'm not sure whether this message will be published. Moreover, not
I’m not sure if it’s WORTH publishing it. But: at the beginning of summer of this year
N. Perumov threatened me with a scandal over the phone if I didn’t soften
your review of it. What I didn’t do. And now a month has passed...
month, but there’s still no scandal, and I’m starting to think that all these attacks
were a joke on the part of Messrs. Berezhny and Nikolaev. Or
order publication in "Two Hundred-A" and other domestic joys count-
become a scandal? But - in any case, you cannot deprive boys of...
luzius.
When this whole story broke, N. Perumov’s reaction showed
I felt somewhat inadequate. In the spring, my review is
Vala in two typewritten copies, and Perumov’s novel was published in
with a circulation of hundreds of thousands and was treated kindly by the official press. Nothing
threatened his further publications, not to mention other things. One-
However, for the information of A. Nikolaev, a lover of gladiator fights, having thought -
shi, I also think that OUR STRENGTHS ARE APPROXIMATELY EQUAL.
N. Perumov (if it’s still him, and not Nikolaev in disguise) once-
burst out with two possible answers. One - abbreviated - published
van. The other, expanded, is addressed to me personally. And it's a shame that
Two Hundred did not publish the full version. This is very interestingdocument. Intended rather for a psychoanalyst. For the witness
it appears that N. Perumov (if it is him again, and not Beret in disguise)
Zhnoy) doesn’t love himself much more than I love him. What is called, you-
a striking example of an inward-directed mortido.
For example, he explains to me, a dark provincial woman, that his
the novel is not at all a continuation of "VK" (excuse me, but what about the subtitle-
wok?), but a conscious polemic with him, and he should not be compared with
"Scarlett" (what does that have to do with it...), and with "Sick of rings." My poor thing
heart! Die, N. Perumov, you can’t write better! I would like this myself
I didn’t say it in the heat of the moment. And the “terrible libel” is not what I’m talking about,
this is him talking about himself...
Poor thing! Why is he acting like this?
Take comfort! I don’t think your novel is a terrible libel. But I do
his normal commercial opus. Even better than Golovachev.
But that's not all. Among the incessant attacks, Mr. Perumov
repeats the idea twice that they supposedly should not interfere with our distance
the greatest collaboration (as an editor, one must assume). But,
If I’m such a reptile as he thinks I am, then shouldn’t I introduce myself?
he says, what am I going to do with his texts? And if he imagines, it has become
maybe he wants this?
Fortunately, we must admit that Mr. Perumov’s mortido has
his boundaries. There were many responses to his essay, but hysterical
He began to talk only about the article written by a woman. And
not at all because of misogyny, but becauseordinary self-preservation.
A. Sviridov can face the table for such penalties, -
he is a strong man. But my weight category is not the same. So
N. Perumov still chose a task that was within his capabilities. What is his claim?
Renne congratulates N. Rezanov.
----------------------------------------------------------------
FROM THE EDITOR: Dear Natalya Vladimirovna! You have perverted
concepts of male politeness and honor. We always believed that
ladies must answer, while a male opponent
You can also answer with proud silence. We believe that as a well-bred
man, N. Perumov (by the way, Russian bronze medalist in hand-to-hand combat)
new battle) at the next Interpresscon, yielding to your wishes,
must challenge A. Sviridov to a duel and allow himself to be beaten. Or not
give as he deems necessary.
* * *
LEV VERSHININ (Odessa):
I don't know how to write letters at all. But the first issue of "Two Hundred" is not
leaves opportunities to remain silent, even if instead of a letter of opinion
you will get something similar to an article.
1. PERUMOV’S PROBLEM
For me there is no problem. In Russian literature there appeared
Xia is a strong, original author who created an intelligent and extremely interesting
a book that has erected a world that is in some ways more interesting and complex
than the world of Tolkien, for the Professor, after all, is a mythologist,
and any myth is emotionally schematic.
Rejection by other fans andwriters of the "Ring of Darkness" dilogy,
I think it was dictated either by cheap snobbery ("Fee, what did he aim for -
Xia!"), or a deliberate, redneck distrust of a person ("Look, who
continues, you stinker!"). The first is simply stupid. Taking advantage of the opportunity
I eat, I apologize to Nikolai Daniilovich: I myself sinned for a long time -
putting off reading "KTs" for later. Well, I don’t like the “continued” genre.
niy", even free ones, I don’t trust them - and I’m glad that in this case
I was wrong. As for “how dare he continue”, the authors
Let them remember the story of “Burdened with Evil” with similar maxims...
and go silent.
The main argument in favor of the fact that "KTs" is a talented and
worthy of attention is, in my opinion, itself untenable
the effectiveness of criticism against him from professionals. And this
despite the fact that the editors of "Two Hundred" undoubtedly selected the best
The best of critical materials!
Naturally, I’m not talking about the absurd, angry and downright stupid-
What article by N. Rezanova. Not at all! The criticism turned out to be so
is unscrupulous, that to refute it is a small task and of little merit -
shadowy, it’s the same as hitting “Down”. Nikolai Daniilovich himself
publicly and painfully flogged this lady. And rightly so.
Pereslegin’s article is a different matter. I am convinced that Sergei is not
as much even a critic as a brilliant literary sociologist
culturologist His analysis of the text is usually complete and comprehensive,
and because of this it is enoughextensive Usually. But not this one
case.
Here Sergei is brief. It is clear that he is not fascinated by the novel. But sis-
the theme of evidence here is much weaker than in any other of his
work. Sometimes there is even a feeling of a kind of “arbitmanism”:
replacing an argument with a biting phrase and a successful image.
One can see some initial predetermination of the reviewer’s position.
zenta. However, Pereslegin is quite professional and honest,
to prevent subjectivity from taking over. And as a result - replacement
its weave, contrary to usual, is short, almost unsubstantiated and
written, as they say, “without a soul.”
But let’s think: if PERESLEGIN could not convincingly prove
If we say that the book is not good, then we cannot help but admit that we are really
We are really dealing with the Phenomenon in our literature...
2. THE "WANDERER" PROBLEM
“Two Hundred-A”, first of all, is Slava’s exhaustive monologue
Loginova, largely closed this topic. Yes, definitely, "pocket"
prize" was established by a specific sponsor in the interests of a specific
persons while relying on the authority of a particular circle. And, of course,
not an ounce in common with the Nebula, because it is awarded by a WIDE circle
professionals and not at all with the money of a generous, but also capricious
sponsor.
In general, the person who pays the money has the right to make decisions, yes! But
The jury of “The Wanderer”, fully aware of the inferiority of the “backstage prize-
ki", not much different from the old Young Guard andcurrent
Nikitin self-awards, tried to consecrate the tsatska with a halo
"Sidorkona", having implicitly signed up those for whom
LOVE FOR FICTION has already become life itself. Such things but
a normal person does not forgive. Hence the flurry of rejection.
But! Much worse - something else!
Defending “corporate”, or rather clan, prestige, for-
The shield of the dubious award was defended by people who could be blamed for the lack of
No one's tongue will rise in the face of intelligence or decency. This is from-
personal guys, clean, honest, talented. But a signal rang out:
"They're beating our people!" - and now they are already flying into the saddles, ready to chop
no mercy. And who to chop? Is it for business? - questions are unnecessary.
And the vagueness of the goal adds foulbrood to the means.
For example, the smart and ironic Misha Uspensky, trying to prove
to prove the unprovable, involuntarily and without wanting it, resorts to re-
twitching. And rightly so. After all, the unprovable, without distorting, is not
you say.
I QUOTE: “What do we call an author who is not interested in opinion
readers? - asks Berezhnoy. Whatever. Socrates, don’t write
who didn't write a line. Rimbaud, who forgot his poems. Kafka, bequeathed
burn everything he wrote..." ("Two Hundred-A", p.41)
There Mikhail also mentioned Khlebnikov with a pillowcase of poems and now-
external postmodernists. As for Khlebnikov, the use of navo-
boxes as a briefcase speaks only about the specific character-
ra poet, about indifference tobenefits, about the absence of a portfolio, finally,
but not about indifference to the opinions of readers. And the current post-mo-
turf... well, you know, the foam will go away, but the reader will remain. And the bolt,
especially since the anchor one will be much more useful to him on the farm,
than all this short-term fashionable postmodern nonsense
tya.
But about the rest... It makes sense to think about it!
A). SOCRATES. Yes, I didn’t write a single line. Firstly, he is a writer
I wasn't. He was a philosopher, he was a peripatetic teacher - one of those who
taught while walking leisurely. As a rule, such people have students
remembering the mentor’s thoughts and then, from memory, I write down
schi. Jesus of Nazareth, in fact, also did not write a single line -
The students tried their best. For in this case the listener is identical to the
tatelu. And who dares to claim that Socrates was indifferent
opinion of Xenophon and Plato? That the Nazarene didn't care
the opinion of the apostles?..
b). RAMBAUD. Yes, I forgot my poems. But I forgot, leaving with a
howl into commerce, abandoning the sins of youth and even being ashamed of them. For-
what a successful slave trader (hawker, shareholder, etc.) should remember
his poems, which did not bring him a sou? To the mature Rimbaud the merchant,
the tator really didn't need it, he spat on him like
and on my own poetry. But is any of the potential ready?
winners of "The Wanderer" openly admit: yes, I’m not interested in me-
readers, because I went to the stalltrade and I don’t give a damn
all sorts of writings that I used to indulge in out of stupidity and youth
reached?..
c). KAFKA. Yes, he ordered it to be burned. But! - precisely because I doubted -
before his death, I suspected, while dying (in vain, of course!),
that the reader will not understand. Why compare this hypertrophied
delicacy and respect for the reader's opinion with self-satisfaction
new pseudo-elitistism declared by A. Stolyarov?.. I don’t think that
A.M. is able to declare: burn, friends, my two-volume book, because it seems
I feel like everything I’ve written is crap. No, sir, I’m absolutely not capable...
This is Ouspensky's argument. Edik Gevor goes even further -
Kyan: “Nobody bothered,” he writes, “to establish another couple, or even
a dozen prizes. Why impose your opinion on writers, having decided
Shall we humbly take part in this celebration of life?" (“Two hundred-A”,
p.43).
Reasonable. And scary. Because it was not the writers who “decided”, but the sponsor
Found with a bonus. For a narrow, albeit worthy circle. But
after all, drinking in one separate apartment is not a holiday
all humanity; in this case, it's not the fans IMPOSING THE WRITERS
their opinion, but it’s just a GROUP OF WRITERS IMPOSING theirs on the fans
opinion, literally forcing them - not by washing, but by rolling - but sow-
participate (at least by being present in the hall) in the procedure. Natural
but people are protesting. Because they don’t want to be a stupid herd that has the right
only to assent and bleat incomprehensibly highdecisions
masters
Eh, “Wanderer”, “Wanderer”... so many nice, sweet, talented...
You tied the right people hand and foot, drove them into a stupid
a fight for the honor of a wooden bush made by an inept carpenter
latika...
But even that’s not all!
ONLY members of the jury speak in defense of "The Wanderer". And in line
their arguments are no-no, and a nasty thought flashes: they scold, because
they envy. And now the most decent Lazarchuk is going to refuse
Shchegolev's hands for the fact that Shchegolev dared not to keep his judgment to himself
hold on. And - apotheosis! - there is a hint that intrigue is to blame
and “the grievances of writers who, by the will of fate, found themselves outside the club “Stranni-
kov"..."
Writers' grievances? Well, well.
I, Lev Vershinin, solemnly declare: it is pleasant to receive
mii. Of course, they scratch their pride. But if you’re going to receive it, then it’s like this
I received Eurocon-93, having learned about this fact much later
voting. Colleagues, there is no need to intrigue or praise yourself.
Simply writing is enough. Smart, honest and CLEAR. Prizes for
lie down.
And, for that matter, there is something above and beyond bonuses. I wasn’t
I have never, thank God, been either a “drabant” or a “seminarian”
on the jury. But when fate gave me, a boy from the street, happiness
relationship with Arkady Natanych, I showed him my stories, and dared
Should you expect him to like them? Could I have hoped that he himself,
without asking (and would I even dare?) he will offer to write a pre-word? He couldn’t. But He offered. And it was an honor above all others.
bonuses.
And I, who have been awarded this honor, simply cannot - even if I want to
- envy the winners of “The Wanderer”, nor those already established (about the great
what an honor!), nor expected (oh harsh inevitability!). At least
because this statue is due to the merits of, say, Rybakov or Lukin
will add absolutely nothing; these merits are already known.
a piece of bronze shows the faded gilding of the aged wunder-
kinda, eternal "drabant" with a famous Person. And, by the way,
ty, is there such a big fundamental difference between “drabants” and
soldiers of another Guard, for example - Young and not always -
Napoleonic?..
Subordination is, after all, a sign of a barracks. And sergeant-major
Belg rushing into Voltaire is, alas, not a new phenomenon for Russia.
3. THE PROBLEM OF COMPASSION
But what is GOOD and what is BAD? Unlike the textbooks
little baby who had the opportunity to receive precise instructions from the mu-
other father, so, unlike Andrei Mikhailovich Stolyarov, I
I don't know the answer. But I can speculate.
I think that the fundamental difference between Russian (Russian) literature is
tours from Western literature lies in the fact that our literature
I have always been compassionate, screaming, calling for help and appealing
to the Conscience. The fiction of Europe is, first of all, analysis, di-
thinking, formal refinement and - not least - entertainmentactivity. In other words: here is the SOUL, there is the MIND.
The origins are probably in the difference between the Catholic and Orthodox mi-
sensations. Catholic scheme: “God exists, for I KNOW WITH MY MIND,
that it cannot but exist" (Thomas Aquinas). Hence the diet-
lism. It is not for nothing that natural
science, and the heretic Bruno tried to understand the Universe just in
so we can come closer to understanding God. Well, it’s true, my colleagues didn’t understand-
whether...
The Orthodox scheme: “God exists, for I FEEL Him in my HEART”
(Sergei Radonezhsky) gave birth to the finest Russian philosophy,
stretching from the monastery cells to the level of everyday life and reflected
there in the eternal questions: “What to do?” and "Who is to blame?"
Russian literature developed with co-suffering and sympathy;
Avvakum Petrov, Mikhail Bulgakov, and Vyacheslav all suffered from the same pain.
kudos to Rybakov. But what she categorically rejected was the desire
lonely, rationally indifferent, devoid of emotions, but worthwhile
on filigree craftsmanship.
This is the essence of the confrontation, A. STOLYAROV’S CONFRONTATION
RUSSIAN LITERATURE AS SUCH, its values and goals. Live
A.M. somewhere in Europe, he, a skilled workshop foreman, would be quite
in its place. There, with the proper skill and luck, he - lo and behold! -
would be able to reach the same level as Joyce or, say, Proust,
would be read and honored by three to four thousand super-aesthetes, we praise
in languidly elitistmugs, crowned with special prizes for players in bi-
sir... and would probably be happy.
But here you cannot be happy if you are not seen as a guru!
The environment leaves its mark; the need for Russian literary
Being a shepherd is akin to the body’s need to breathe. But funny
watch how cold rationality seeks to impose its
feeling, its aesthetics to those facets of literature that were originally
are involved in emotional perception and emotional detachment
dacha. The reader clearly senses the foreignness of the newly-minted prophet and
rejects him. The Prophet, sincerely perplexed, decides that the sheep
gone too far - and it’s worth letting the stupid herd get a little blood...
This is the first component of the call for war!
Well, with your mind you can put a lot of things into categories. But no -
but with the mind, and only with it, to comprehend the pain that is life. And the horse
Of course, artificial, plastic and paper flowers have the right to
existence. Unless they interfere with living things...
4. THE PROBLEM OF RESISTANCE
However, what has been said does not exhaust the essence of the issue.
It just so happened that the Russian state machine of the last
lu millennia, having inherited the traditions of the Horde and Byzantium, was founded
on total lack of personal freedom. This is common knowledge. In Europe
the possibility of confrontation with the system was quite wide (for
for a nobleman - with a sword, for a merchant - with a purse, for the mob - an emig-
walkie-talkie or heresy). INRussia, in the only way (except for
meek and senseless riots) of protest remained the WORD. And
Russian literature was originally a literature of resistance
lenition - even in a whisper, even in a salon conversation or careful
epigram, but she fought against total, and therefore stupid, Power.
And often she died. Unlike the same Europe. THERE, let's put it
Balzac sadly and comfortably stated that society is not deprived
ulcers, and HERE the writer, if he wanted to remain himself, could not
don't get into trouble. What's the point of giving examples? There are countless numbers of them. And
it is well known that reconciliation with the authorities (even more so, integration into
her) meant death - certainly moral, and often
physical (Fadeev...).
Until very recent years, the history of our literature was history
the struggle of Conscience with Shamelessness. Now the coordinate scale has collapsed...
So what? The cautious frondeurs of the sixties danced to their heart's content
on a dead dragon, but... did not want to see how from the belly of a monster -
ra a new monster is growing - a hundred times more dangerous, sparkling...
a lot of slogans and perfectly adapted to the new reality
ness.
The dragon remained a dragon, only changing colors. But this is new
decorated, the dragon with visible desire began to support the former
frontiers, people who are quite sophisticated and intelligent, who know the use of
the hidden value of slogans written from mouth to tail. Support-
whether. They propped it up and begansingers and lawyers of the triumphant, insolent
shamelessness, stupid and dirty violence...
The new dragon is bright and colorful, unlike the old one, it is suede-
logo - has a mammalian udder, and therefore... he is right. And he knows
cheat, everything can be justified.
You can justify those who trample on the constitution and then demand
respect for the rule of law from their own victims. You can support those
who shoots his own parliament and then calls for execution
trampled towards the civil world. You can sanctify with your authority
corrupt media, participating in total
lies...
Why not? Anything is possible! - yes, only thereby yesterday’s
idols and lights, rulers of thoughts turn into their own opposites
exactly. Taking the side of the well-fed, arrogant and unprincipled clique
ki, they betray both their ideals and those who piously believe their word -
lei...
Think about it! Among the pillar Russian intelligentsia,
people appeared calling for executions and arrests, people capable of
sticking out his caviar-smeared lip, impressively calling them “temporary
inevitabilities" massacres on the outskirts, flows of refugees, old people, herding
hiding under trash cans...
For the first time in centuries, cadaveric spots appeared on the body of Russian literature.
culture, whatever! - culture in general; the tank and the tray became sim-
the oxen of our tomorrow.
But didn’t everyone get screwed? Didn’t everyone fall to the dragon’s breasts?
No. However, the earth shook and under those feetthe purest that
fought with the colossus of Byzantineism, not sparing themselves. Life lost
meaning; It’s uncomfortable without an enemy. Instead of a pain center - an aching cover -
on...
If struggle has become the essence of life, entered into flesh and blood, it means
the show MUST go on. But who should we fight? With vile action
vigor? It is forbidden. A new dragon, despite all the disadvantages, still
defeated the previous one, fiercely hated, and therefore - to a certain extent -
peni is “socially close.” And secondly and most importantly... raise your sword
on it - and, what the hell, they’ll immediately sign you up in the “red-brown-
"high" or, say, "anti-Semites" - this is generally a unique label.
The branding technique has been worked out, the set of labels has been approved from above, and
helpful TV easily and quickly turns the sticker into a permanent one
tattoo...
Yes, it’s pointless and stupid to kick the old monster. He is dead.
Yes, it is dangerous and unusual to kick a new monster. He is incomprehensible.
And it’s too late to learn new fighting techniques. Alas, years...
So experienced fighters gather in flocks, remembering the past
days, biting their long mustache, slowly laurate each other - and the sword -
melt about the day when the struggle begins again.
This is the second component of the call to war.
But against what? Is it really against the bestial, swine power?
No, sir. Against “bad” literature, which is what “bad” is prescribed
themselves. That’s the same thing. No worse than, say, masturbation in a narrow circle.
And, alas, not everyone is given the brightest, incredible talent of SlavaRybakova,
who managed to break out of the loop - and in spite of everything write
"Tsesarevich".
Well, in case your soul still feels sad, there is certainly
This is an excuse, a reference to the Divine, whose ways are inscrutable, and we
only His prophets. To the Deity who thinks for everyone and especially
liberates his faithful adherents from the chimera called doubt...
5. THE PROBLEM OF DIVINE.
For the first time in my memory, on the pages of a science fiction magazine, they will remember
com context B.N. Someone dared to do this respectfully and streamlinedly.
Emo (Loginov), someone lost his temper (Sick). But - word
said...
Well, I don’t know the behind-the-scenes subtleties of the Seminar. And not for a moment
I don’t forget that we all came out of the Strugatskys’ overcoat and too
I owe them a lot. But I remember something else: creator and man, coexisting
in one body, are not always similar to one another in everything.
I have heard many maxims of the Divine. Many notes from the Deity about
I read about our life today over the past year. And a lot of things want
it would be possible and possible to say to the Divine.
But.
The great happiness of my life was my personal acquaintance with A.N.
And therefore - in memory of the ELDER - I will not say a word about the LESS...
Lev Vershinin
September 16, 1994
* * *
A. NIKOLAEV (St. Petersburg):
So it turns out that the affairs of the past days are notare forgotten,
they think and suffer. But - only because from comprehension the
the future depends on what goes on. That’s why I took up these lines, - therefore,
and not to make excuses.
It was mentioned several times in different places that Nikolaev
"Interpresscon-94" forced everyone to vote for "Gravilet...",
he almost went door to door and demanded with a knife at his throat...
I don’t deny it - I spoke and tried to convince. But - to convince. Everyone
was free to convince anyone to vote for the one he liked
text. I thought I had the right too. Now I understand - I was wrong. I,
Nikolaev Andrey Anatolyevich, executive secretary of Inter-
presscona" - I couldn’t. It’s funny, but why couldn’t he - the mountain explained to me -
much later B.N. Because I, as an official, seem to
I FORCE, my words are perceived almost as a DIRECTIVE to
mandatory execution.
Damn it all, due to my youth and naivety, I don’t even imagine
I thought that I could be perceived by someone as an official.
Here is an approximate train of my thoughts: Do I personally like “Gravity Flyer”?
Crazy. Do I want him to get Interpresscon? Not that
I wish, I can’t imagine that he won’t receive it, it will be a disaster
a stanza for the prize that Sidor and I had suffered through. Do I have the right
convince? Yes. Because no official or financial matters
not personally connected with Rybakov - just good human relations
sewing. Again: any fraudunacceptable. I had no doubt about
himself, but technically he did everything in such a way as to avert any possible
suspicions (oh, and if I were on the counting commission, what would
did they say that?).
I am still convinced that getting someone to stand on the point
seeing another against the will is impossible. Now, if I checked with
voting ballots - whether they crossed them out, then yes! But
No matter how much I convinced Arbitman (they argued for about an hour), I have no doubt
I'm sure he voted for Dr. Katz's work. And I convinced Sviridov
vote for “Gravilet” - he argued, argued, and I argued. I
I don’t know what he voted for, most likely I didn’t convince him, but...
Did this even slightly change something in our relationship?
"Gravilet" received the award solely because it deserved
her, no intrigues were the reason for this. Maybe I’m two or three
he convinced them (even if only five) that he was right. But it's not
it was forbidden for anyone to convince anyone against “Gravilet” - even special
We dedicated special official hours to this.
I understand that Andrei Gennadievich Lazarchuk can harbor
I'm offended - the difference in votes turned out to be very small (but
we can say that Berezhnoy convinced everyone present at the campaign
tations, otherwise they would...).Moreover, without feeling guilty, I feel-
I feel guilty before Lazarchuk. I've read "Other" twice.
sky" is a cool thing, I will re-read it many times, words
no. Butturned everything upside down in my soul and made me suffer
make-believe "Gravity plane" Tsesarevich ", damn it!
Naturally, I would very much like the Interpress Prize to
Kona" flourished so that nothing would mar its reputation. Sidor and I
We understand that she is not yet perfect (to put it mildly), but we understand
that the PERFECT AND MOST PRESTIGIOUS award cannot be born
maybe. We need to work and earn money. So I'm very grateful
to everyone who suggests something to improve the same counting system
- we need to think and change. Therefore, I cry after Alan Kubatie -
you: let everyone start with themselves and read the nominated works
building, since he takes the voting lists with a calm hand.
But I accept all reproaches addressed to me. Guilty. And I'm very sorry-
I hope it all turned out this way. No, it’s not that “Gravity” won, it’s
there should have been. But it would be better if everyone read it themselves,
and there would be no need to explain anything to anyone.
In any case, so that this does not happen again, I solemnly
I promise: none of the works on the list during the Interpress
"no one will hear a word from me, even if I try very hard
sieve Naturally, as a reader, I am not going to give up the soul
personal need to discuss what we read in the kitchen with friends -
but as a private individual. Moreover, on the pages of “Two Hundred” it is printed
to discuss and, if possible, produce a list, I left
nominationcommissions.
It’s somehow still not easy for me to get used to the idea that I’ll be considered
act as an official with authority. Recently the organizing committee
Interpresscona met and formed a Council, which included Sidorovich,
B.N. and your humble servant. And the question was immediately asked: who will be the
it is up to the authorities to invite or not to invite to Interpresscon.
Yes, these three. Yes, I gained such power with Sidor. But I don't
strove for her. And God knows, I have never refused anyone, if
someone sincerely works for fiction. Everyone who somehow
Sidorovich contacted us, WE RECEIVED INVITATIONS. I don't see why
this must change.
And “Gravity plane “Tsesarevich” is the best I’ve read, not that...
only last year, but also in the last five-year period. Just when
Will Vyacheslav Mikhailovich write the next work?
sha fan.
Andrey Nikolaev, October 5, 1994
* * *
BORIS ZAVGORODNY (Volgograd):
I don't even know where to start. Probably from the main thing - and beloved,
and sick, and interesting, and boring.
MALVINA: So, let's start the lesson. You have two apples. Suppose
that you gave one apple to someone. How many apples do you have left?
Pinocchio: Two.
MALVINA: Why two? After all, you gave one apple to Someone.
Pinocchio: But I won’t give up one apple to Someone, even if he fights!
Comments, in my opinion, are unnecessary. Although exactly howcomments and
comments to comments I intended my answer to Interpress
Kon", or more precisely, "Sidorkon-Oberham" and "Two Hundred". "Sidorkon-
Oberham" I managed to read while on Komarina Plesha, and "Two Hundred"
right in the proofs at Nikolaev’s apartment.
Seryozha, Andrey, you should have seen how everyone was tearing your magazine out of your hands
each other - ATAS! We read voraciously (as not every “Massandra”
dream) and argued and argued, scolding whomever was necessary, praising whomever was not necessary.
Quite adequate, in short. And they even forgot for a while the disputes over fresh
numbers of the "Black Cormorant", as someone figuratively called it on Plesha
"Guardian Bird".
My comments on everything that is happening and described in the journal-
nalakh are simple and unpretentious: more bonuses. Both good and different. And
Let no one leave offended! Literary war? How interested
s-sure! But a small logical-fiction excursion into the future,
and the old slogan: “There is a person, there is a problem...”
Reluctance...
But in general, in the literary world this has always been, is still
children, just not so shockingly called: discussions, conferences,
open letters and so on. Interesting, right! War! She finally-
but it brings glory, honor, and rewards, but it also happens the other way around
mouth?! And sometimes it’s even more funny. You are at war, but not with you. What's it like?
But in any case, it’s interesting - it touches you, invigorates you, and gets your blood hot. In-
It’s interesting how to live, brothers!
By the way, unpleasant news for all those who buried the WTO.WTO
alive! And right now he is conducting his seminar. And books are published in small
small So the rumors, as usual, are exaggerated. Everything is very simple and
thank God. They ceased to be the first and only, and books
theirs are now equal among equals, lost in book ruins.
But if you so desire, seek and you will find. If you want.
It was nice to learn about Nick Perumov - a man and a writer.
Out of the simplicity of my soul, I also thought that this was not a person - a pseudonym.
And he sculpted such a lump! By the way, Kolya (is it possible? If not -
write to the room urgently), here’s a joke for you: We’re standing like this in Kyiv on
book market, trading and speculating a little SF, client as usual
doesn’t work, which means we’re chatting about her, dear NF. In particular, about ro-
Perumov's mane - which edition is supposed to be better: Stavropol, or
"North-Western", why are they so different, and is it an early
version published in one of these publications? When suddenly one of
crowd got into our conversation and categorically declares: “Well
this is just understandable why the texts of the publication differ - once
different translations, different translators..." They laughed for a long time. When separated
they said meaningfully: “Oh, grayness, we know who the
this apsedoronym is hidden." As for the charges of attempted murder,
When I visited the Shrine, I had one interesting incident. I met
with Taisiya Iosifovna Efremova (I’ve been dreaming for a long time), I’m sitting drinking tea.
blowing. Two members fromcommission on literary us-
lady Ivan Antonovich. And suddenly the door opens and he walks in
such a luxurious cat. Mustache erect, tail pipe. Class! I told him
“kitty-kitty” - zero emotions. Without hesitation, I take him by the scruff of the neck and
on your knees. Zero emotions! The cat is stoic! But how they hissed at me
members in literature and so on... God! How can you?! After all
This is the cat that Ivan Antonovich knew and loved! Shrine! And to that
similar...I was scared. Thought about it. What did I really do
Isn’t that right? He asked Taisiya Iosifovna with his gaze, an unspoken question
and the request for forgiveness were in my eyes. And Taisiya Iosifovna is good
smiled, casually waved her palm towards the members of the team
mission and said: “Oh, leave it!” But the cat, the cat is a young fellow, so
and lay on my lap and even, it seems to me, purred. So people,
Just like cats, they are different. Sasha Siletsky once said:
It was a long time ago. I woke up in the hayloft and couldn’t believe my eyes. Early
morning, meadow, and naked girls are running along it and wet their feet in the dew. Before-
drove, asked. It turns out that they are followers of Efremov’s teachings.
I don’t know if they are still running around there. Most likely not - for a long time
that was a very long time ago.
Natalya Rezanova: okroshka is good and tasty. Been to Bolga-
riy, treated to a chatterbox. These are Bulgarian cucumbers, cut, natural-
of course, and filled with their own Bulgarian kefir. Not bad, for sure. But
There's not enough sausage! And eggs! And onions! It would betastier.
To Vadim Kazakov: Zhenya Lukin has a poem. Everything is wrong
I remember. The beginning, yes: “The trial is merciless and short, they carry the murdered book,
epilogue forward..." And, in general, you, Vadim, are right. The public is all this
took the action too seriously, like the famous painting “For-
roll the sun manually." And I liked it. And the girls were good -
just overly dressed, and the bonus is good - big, weighty. And mine
“The bastard” may be small, but I’m proud of him and show him to everyone.
To everyone: the letters are interesting, I read them with pleasure. Sometimes too much
harsh, but I'm not the judge. I liked the comparisons and epithets in “Two Hundred”:
"Bark beetle", "perfect oak". Freshly! Or "table by ranks".
"Qua-qualified reader." Or "waves in science fiction."
Let's say: "Cop wave of science fiction." Don't believe me? Decide for yourself:
Bryder, Rudenko, Sinyakin, Pershanin, Temnov...
And one more thing. It went like this: I drink the penultimate glass, I look out the window - about-
communicating with the Motherland, I squeeze Grishka’s (this is a fish) fin and give it to her
the last piece of sausage. And Lukin comes. And hands over thirteen
uncomfortable answers to the editors of the magazine "Two Hundred". Because I'm going again
to St. Petersburg - this is not mail, it is more reliable. Zhenya reads out uncomfortable
questions and your uncomfortable answers. We drink, eat, laugh.
Even Grishka (believe me - it’s true) in his own ways, accessible to her
in solidarity with us - sometimes it will stand up as a candle, sometimes on the contrary, beauty! Ser-
smart fish Grishka - and was brought up in strictness andlove for science fiction writers!
And I’m already on my way - two long nights and a long day - to St. Petersburg. And I think
I think about thirteen uncomfortable questions: What is Fandom?
Well, Seryozha, Andryusha, really - it’s difficult to ask a more awkward question.
think! Don't know! This is me, these are my friends, these are books, this is my Grishka,
finally! And this is my life! So I brought it to St. Petersburg, in the hope of finding
kind translator, one (only one!) book written by Dr.
rum of medicine and called "The World of Fanzines". But such books of darkness
and darkness! Maybe there is an answer there?
Wow, how twisted the second, third and fourth questions are! Similar
"Rope, there is a simple rope!" But the answer already sounded, and it sounded
like this: “There are two opinions - mine and the wrong one.” Just somehow everyone
One forgets that a “wrong” opinion is also an opinion. With my
philosophy, position, followers, etc. And for some reason
no one remembers that one cannot exist without the other, like the north
without the south. Guys, hit your balls from either end, but why because of
this quarrel. For some reason they also call me funny
they call Fan No. 1. I’m no longer denying, I’m just adding - number: one of
many.
I like the fifth question! Right now I’ll place you. Best of all,
of course, the "Great Ring"! No doubt! Far away eighty
first happy year, I am a young, green fan, I came to
"Aelita" and immediately began to prove what is absolutely provable: we need
we have our own, Soviet "Hyuuga". And that's itThey argued with me terribly. Needed
they said it was necessary. And the debate ended unexpectedly for me - you
said, you do it. And for 81, 82, 83 years I did just that. Wrote a letter-
ma, received answers, drew graphs, received results, made-
I awarded diplomas and bought prizes. And in 1983 I got into a two-way situation.
the eleventh question - having produced a diploma, signed it, bought a statue -
etku and handing it over to a certain Zavgorodniy B.A. - in the category "For
contribution to science fiction." It's funny, but what did I have to do for-
earlier? Make a proposal so that I, as the one conducting the vote,
no prize was awarded? I can imagine the reaction! Oh, so you're so sure
what will people vote for you?! Well, get it...
So, the “Great Ring” - because in voting it can
Everyone is welcome to participate. I wish I could make it even heavier, golden
you, say, or from money - imagine: a money ring! And in
there's something to this!
Then the “Interpresscon” award - all the visitors take part in it.
shi. Very democratic!
Then "Aelita" and "Snail". Both because of people dear to my heart
dey.
"Wanderer". Unfortunately, our “Nebula” cannot be obtained from it
It happened, but it was probably intended that way. But in the weight of this
awards, there is no doubt. What a lump! Actually, they gave me
such a runt - a “scoundrel”, as he was immediately aptly dubbed
people, but still good! Artwork! No joke
if, then “Wanderer” is a collectiveopinion of a dozen or more everyone
our respected people. How can I ignore this award?!
And not respect her?
"Belyaev Prize" - interesting, yes! But what do I know about it? Prak-
nothing, like most of you. At first glance, it seems
artificial formation... But wait and see.
But, Andrey and Seryozha, there are many other awards - uk-
the Russian "Chumatskiy Shlyakh", for example, "Rigey" - the Perm club, and
prizes of the Khabarovsk KLF, unfortunately, are no longer awarded. Vinnitsky
newborn "One-wise" is already an anti-premium, akin to "Griadny"
Crocodile." And our Volgograd annual be-
paid subscription to the magazine "Helminthology". Eh, it happened, it happened!
They awarded us! And what can we say about other, not our, awards that we received?
lurking - Eurocon, World Science Foundation organization. But it’s already close
a time when our people will have both a Hugo and a Nebula. Sure! But
So far there are few bonuses. We need new ones - the time will come, so it will be. And again
It will be like this - satisfied, dissatisfied, scandals. In short, it’s interesting
det.
Sixth question: oh, inconvenient! It would be simple to answer - but here’s the truth -
Only! But this is in Lukin’s style. Honestly, I don’t know. But I know one thing -
"The Wanderer reflects the collective opinion of the people who awarded it." A
As for Rybakovsky’s “Gravilet”, the car is a fool!
It’s not for nothing that old computer engineers call them (machines) hardware. And with
What a demand for iron - wow, Shelezyak’s planet! But the mostfunny,
gentlemen - there was a time, I read Rybakov’s works before, and
Now, alas, I’ve been looking for a year for where to read “Gravity Flyer” - I can’t find it!
Maybe the author will let you read it?
Seventh question: Perhaps reality is small, you are right. But the year-
another will show what, how much and why - for sure. Let's wait.
Eighth question: Well, guys, what kind of creativity is this that is so
can easily be suppressed, and even more so by the “Wanderer”, no matter how he increases
I wasn’t systy. I’m not a writer, and I already know how it’s written, so it’s written...
It's going on, and there's nothing you can do about it. Finally, re-read
“Ugly Swans”, it says this with extreme openness.
Ninth: The Nebula is also awarded to science fiction writers who write
in different directions - however, some common opinion was developed
is recognized, and the prize has been awarded for thirty years in a row. God willing
Our “Wanderer” has so much to live! And so much more! I don't know
It seems to me that you, friends, have completely forgotten that very important
The fact is that science fiction writers are people too. They eat, they sleep, they love, they just
they love, like us, their readers, read books and do it without consulting
with their aesthetic principles. And even vice versa - their principles
come out of the above. And in your question it turns out that they
(science fiction writers) make their lives by checking aesthetic principles
tsipami.
Tenth question: I rate it! Exactly! Both literary and con-
juncture, and political! And if I did myaward, and me
it would be necessary to have an authoritative jury - it is from these positions that I would
started collecting it. A person means something, has achieved something in life -
therefore, his opinion is valuable, his advice is significant. How else?
Eleventh: As far as I have heard and read, Igor Vsevolo-
Dovich did not come for one, offensively simple reason - he had
The dacha where his office was and his manuscripts were stored burned down. By-
the heat, of course, was not accidental, for it is difficult to call it an accident
"Molotov cocktail", but this has nothing to do with "The Wanderer"
has. And next year, I am sure, we will all meet with our respected
by the science fiction writer Kir Bulychev.
And the last, thirteenth question (I have already answered the twelfth).
My goodness, oh, how touchy we are. However, I always like
It seemed that Yura Fleishman had a hard time with humor. Or maybe I didn’t get the
I'm sorry? I see absolutely no reason why one noble lord
we don’t give prizes to other noble dons. Who benefits from this?
ho? Why should I feel offended? Roman Lazarchuk
I read it and liked it. Stolyarov - read, "Donkey" and "Message"
good (especially “Donkey” - our thing and about us!). And "Monakhov"
I read it and didn’t understand it at all, didn’t like it. But this is my personal little
It's a big tragedy, I'm probably not grown up enough. Although I read Ulysses - not
I understood, but I liked it, I will read it again. But what is the insult here?
laziness - I won’t be able to get in, dear sirs.Of course, what's here
hide, I heard this opinion not only from Fleishman, but also from
other people I also respect - but, despite the explanations,
I still didn’t understand anything. It’s strange how people think, in some kind of
mountains, levels... completely inaccessible to me. I’m even a little jealous
but... Can you imagine how great it would be if they gave it to, say, Ursula?
(yes, yes, the same one with the left hand) “Hyuuga” and “Nebula” at once - and I
took it and declared: this is a mortal insult to me personally and to the whole world.
wow Fandom! Scandal-brilliance - finally insanity! No guys, of course I am
I repeat, but let's live together! Friendly and fun! Otherwise I’ll establish
and how I will present my award...!
So, that’s it, perhaps, or rather, Dixie
Share your thoughts about the article