Editor's column - Sergey Berezhnoy, Andrey Nikolaev.

        Sergey BEREZHNOY A. NIKOLAEV:
                                 
   Well, the trababahs called the mate - Here’s the story with me
rials printed in the previous occurred. One reader calls
room! The professional soul rejoices after Oberham, dedicated to
nal provocateur.  Passion "Sidorkonu", and asks: And from-
boiling. The audience is squealing about how Arbitman found out the whole truth
sausage juice in a frying pan. Soper - about Kazantsev? Let me explain: jokes. And for me
Nicks are buying up pneumatic ones and saying: if a real Kazan-
carbines, because the lungs are not his thing, he went to prison for someone else,
unable to withstand such a pace of mutual camp, the reason may be
a lot of spitting. However, there is only one saliva - love for Shapiro!
Enough for now. How is it in the classi- Well, - I answer, - on an old man-
ka: for centuries such an accusation has also been
    Rivals on the battlefield!     damn, too much!... Why am I saying this?
    Know no peace among yourself, The same reader, only
    Bear tribute to the gloomy glory - having learned that his name was remembered in
    And revel in enmity!.. one of the materials of “Two Hundred-A”,
   It must be noted that I was terribly indignant at some points. I say: you
than emotions overflow through read. And in response: I am this
edge of the glass. Some have chosen dirty tricks; I won’t take them into my hands. Length
for discussion the wrong tone (“You beeps. Conversationfinished and
killed the cashier!") Some - it seems, forever. 
incorrect address (“It’s all because of Be- We are peaceful people by nature. But
Rezhny and Nikolaev, if they had not taken up making the magazine, because 
they would all have made peace long ago"). which is seething in the chest. Not us 
Some people prefer to keep the problems that we are thinking about.
proud silence, pretending to try to discuss. And sometimes it’s difficult
to pass along the edge without stepping over the insult of the body
and secretly hoping to get along with it. In the mouth of one author the words
it would be easy to ignore the argument of the “bad person” in relation to
opponents (“There is no one, and there was no other) are the definition
never..."). As another person said, but according to his concepts, this 
a classic, in its own time, its own poetry, its own definition
in nature.                       the address is invalid
   What the heck am I talking about? About cultivating.
round of controversy. I would like, for example, And everyone is always right. Except for re-
An example is to counter nearby dactors. Yes, it probably should
the parties did not intend to be each other.
behind a friend of insidious thoughts and But maybe it’s worth thinking
bloodsucking habits. We are all mothers: if you don’t want you
we barked at each other to publish and called him a fool, then he himself didn’t
as much as possible - or should I call anyone a fool?
then I don’t understand? Yes - and, of course, not Sorry for the harshness, with respect -
due toothers. That's all with your offer and sincerely yours.
put forward postulates. And if your
the argument was ignored, so
It won’t take long to repeat it. From the language
a strong hint: there is nothing to cover,
they say...
  And I wish everyone that there is something
cover