ZX Pilot #41 29 декабря 2002

IS-DOS

about different - IS-DOS is not so bad?

             O R W A N O M



(C) SirX


             Little about the IS-DOS.


   Lord, not a good trend has
to take shape - often IS-DOS became
porugivat, and judging by the articles or
simple minded people who either like
intelligent but causing arguments on which
hair stand on end, and the question arises -
where they have taken - a feeling that
systems are either not seen or are familiar
poverhnosno. But let's start from the beginning.

   Examples of how usually taken first, which
caught my eye. Journal "ZX POWER" - a
some Vic'a in the file extview.txt 200
strings (!?) - who has seen? How much I do not
tried, but receives no more than 20
lines, or can I have the eyes of what?

   Somewhere hitting - they say Norton Galim. Thus,
my dear, and you do not think that now
All licks with MS? Have a look at the screenshots
other "new" OS - that does not like? So there.
And what's worse Norton, someone
clearly, without soplezhuystva explain. If
just do not like - say so, but
sling mud is not worth it.

   Next. Memory a little? What RAM-disk is already
not for the upper memory? Send data
with the crime? And if
remember that many of the functions to write
is not necessary - simply calls the restart, then
probably become even easier. And some
programs still use 128'yu memory
(Eg isunzjr.com), who interferes
see how it's done? Well, if
Sput-DOS have been able to develop, for which
nothing was, so to IS-DOS
complain about sin. Someone drive up to 800 kb
little, they say the system itself is almost the entire disc
is strange, but in the TR-DOS for you, too
each disk write formatters, and view'ery
etc? For example, I IS-DOS
configured so that, immediately after
kernel opens email. Drive by 832
block, which is already
neobhodiny bare minimum to work, and
then the disk is still 487
free blocks. So what conclusions do
themselves. Do not like something in the shell, because
no one forbids something to change, even
author.

   But totally killed me on the spot a
Chertkov VY log Voyager # 3 -
read and you learn so much
exciting, interesting, and that
want to throw in the pharmacy for something,
that of glitches saves. So, I
Nemo blames for bias in the CP-M, but
himself throughout his so
discriminate against anything that is not
CP-M is that the hair stand on end.
Article he begins with the words alleged, but if it had;
in short, if a cake was, or percent
Z180, etc. For those who do not know -
saying: "If my grandmother were
eggs - it would be my grandfather. "Speck
is this what it is - not like, so
paid off, no holds. And why is it
interestingly, we want a lot from him? Yes, he
was created for games, but still at the
time he developed to perform well
minimum problems for the home (and not just
game!) companies. Further, the author gave
IS: IS-DOS is not running!? And what is it?
Ie What do you mean? According to the author
compare MagOS and CP-M is a savage, and this
statement a million times greater than
savagery, if you want to create the illusion
smart, so do not porous so # uyni. And again
did not like the fact that Nemo underestimates
possibility of CP-M, and myself what you are doing? Then
lyapnesh, saying that in CP-M is any file
It works everywhere: on the flop, on a screw on the email.
disk; something I do not understand, and that isdose
no what? In my opinion this is
bias, for which you criticize
Nemo. Say that CP-M is an add-
on a computer, which is a mediator
between programs and devices, as well as
that of CP-M is judged by the brake (according to your
words) Copy K, so here it is
bias. Can not competently
justify - so do not throw mud at what
not using it. And as you can not understand
that in the outback is very little Profi, in
mostly home-made type Penatagon'a yes
Scorpio can sometimes be found, and accordingly
CP-M is almost never used.

   Advertisement NeOS also no distinct
arguments about the IS-DOS does not lead,
again, only something vague: because
imperfections in the file shell of difficult
the use of HDD, CD-ROM!? Strangely,
especially when you see a normal working
PC with a screw (under the EC-DOS, of course).
Next NEOS supports up to 4 MB of memory,
where so much? Well, you have to write as if
driver under the IS-DOS, which will be
take into account the various expansion ports, and
get the same thing. Next, the system
drivers to control everything. Hmm, but
IS-DOS than a magic wand or something
managed? Library functions. A system
restarts is that something else? Any
external hard drive. Well, I've zadolbalsya
write about it, guess yourself. Itself
currently NeOS leaves a good impression
(The description). But it seems to me that this is
another attempt to reinvent the wheel. Yes
and all the pros NeOS thwarted
stitching in ROM. The authors are not geniuses, glitches
will be caught for a long time, and that every time
alter Rom? In my opinion this is a mistake. No
presently no stitches OS in ROM, so
everything changes, everything evolves.

   At this point I'll call it a day. Ask
note that I am wasting neither
one OS can not hit. And the request to all: Well
Do not water DIRT YOU WHAT YOU DO NOT
LIKE, AND JUST SAY THAT TO ME THIS
DO NOT LIKE (IF NO INTELLIGENT
Arguments). A IS-DOS at the moment
only competitive operating systems capable of
those that can be put on any spec.
So can stop dreaming about something,
Why has not and will develop what
there?


                     Sincerely, SirX.


   P.S. In terms of commonplace erudition
by the author psychedelic
phantasmagoria reveals to the reader
dialectical existentialism syndrome
postcoital abstinence when
individual is not able to selectively
abstract from the inherent Laminate
his deviant aberration, showing thereby
vivid example of the convergence of the destructive
mentality and permanent cognitive
creativity.

        ;)))))) BYE!!