ZX Pilot #41 29 декабря 2002

Люди

Topic - Nemo why this son of a bitch?

               T E M A I



(C) Nemo


               ZX-Pilot # 38.


   "Now a few words about the Open
letters. I had a mind to order payment
KAY1024, but after reading got sick. I
sufficiently educated man, but all
time and place. Ie from a literary point
view I am interested to read opus
B. Skutina, but from a technical point
view ... When instead of a simple answer
a fairly simple question begins with
in terms of commonplace erudition ...". One
In short, sometimes you lose hope
read a specific answer. And it is unclear
my attitude Vyacheslav (Nemo) everything
which is associated with MS. I'm not going to teach
Vyacheslav live, he's older and more experienced, but
what to do if the film is Claudia
almost never find - exit the PC-Claudia, mouse-MS and
etc. A IS-DOS does not remake an MS-DOS
MS? Drives or 3.5 "? Vyacheslav said
that on the drive that his firm
implements the hardware is off 1.44,
that, according to him, it was not possible
its full operation on
PC-compatible machines. Recently seen
advertisement Deja Vu (thanks Vel'u), there
says that the scheme will be published on
refinement of the controller to work with HD
floppy disks, and if it (the scheme) will be
standing that will say those who have purchased
drives at Nemo? Correct: "Thank you,
Uncle Slava, for your concern! "Also, do not
I understand the "attacks" Nemo at the Scorpion,
Judging by the publications, Vyacheslav himself worked
in this firm, and the number of programs, not
going to KAY, apparently, more
(Referred to UFOs and the Battle Command) ".

   Let's start from the beginning. 1. What about simple
answers to simple questions. If a person
does not understand what asked, or my
direct response can lead to
unintended consequences - for example,
break companies - he really did not
given. But read a long lecture.
Stupidity (or misunderstanding) - if sitting
too deep - may require not
to a paragraph, and the whole opus - so that
is small. Incidentally, it is written in
file about. It is clear that not read
interesting - much more pleasant solder
postings. If a person clearly raises
question and understand what asked -
the answer is always neat - again, see
"Open letters". And then, "Open letters" -
this is not a collection of cooking recipes - on a
There are other editions.

   2. At the expense of MS. Again, it is necessary
read a lecture. Everything connected with the PC - it is
stupidity - a rare exception, which
to "Op. Let" has nothing to do,
Yes, and Home computer, too. And those
distortions in the brain, which
encountered, the rod is
there. Where did it from there, I am now
I will explain.

   "Regardless of whether the intended
products for consumer, industrial
selskohoyaystvennogo or market your
customers are individual consumers,
which is something read or heard about
your product in some (read - any,
Nemo) media, which, actually, FOR THIS
And published.

   This is a quote from the "Publicity and public
relations ", American author Dorothy
I. Doty. This is a book for specialists
PR. Notice from the American
point of view, the media are issued to
vparivat - and not for something more. But
some Vanka - lamer take it
as Science, as some fundamental
framework, and seek there any ... ...
(Inaudible - SirX), try something
do. And actually - it's blizzard,
ponosnogo origin. These are the same
News, in which there is no truth, and truth in
which there is no news. As a result,
going mental debilitation of consciousness. And so,
rinsing the brains in this shit (I-net -
this is no exception - this is also the media, and also
American), they write me letters.
And - particularly called attention to it -
even if they are interested solely
spectrum'ovskoy theme, they use
stereotypes, cliches of thought, words
(Who often do not make sense)
borrowed from it. It's like
Zhdanovskaya liquid - it gets into
every pore - from her not to hide - it
overtakes lamer everywhere. And in these letters
I have to meet - at his own expense -
that this rust, it is not broke Karosta
Spectrum. Then fit for the milk harmfulness
drink - try to explain Lameroo that
shit candy search not worth it. The deal
gone so far that scary
becomes. It could happen, and so
that the consequences will have to deal
not FAPSI and MChS'u. Now examples - but
it is recommended to take valerian.

   Open the magazine "Your computer" # 8 in
1998, p. 23. And what do we see? A
see "Description of the power supply MS9022.02"
scheme in PCAD'e. Everything is very solid. Stupid
Nemo is going to give to this publication
link in its "User's Guide"
- He does not know that here it
lies in wait for the PC-to lie in ambush. And only through
three months of watchful hawk noticed that
No schema Isolation
(In the PSU, it certainly is). Like
would change - but not so simple. Lamer,
BP bought a Nemo, can take it for
face value and to ground (well, for example,
oscilloscope, OR FOR EXTENSION OF COMP) C
Network side. And does not the fact that it
it does not kill you. And who will be the deadline?
Correctly. Of course, as always in such
cases, psychologically - all
arrows on myself - as I could so
wrong? - where is my mistake? - how could I
this view? A casket just
opened. Scheme sometime in PCAD'e. Let me explain
details. From the standpoint of the manufacturer
(Production worker) scheme in PCAD'e - is
the ultimate truth. Because
PCAD - is part of the production cycle
for the production of printed circuit boards. If errors
and there, then they are "clean" when
making an experimental batch. In other words,
scheme to verify the actual product.
Simply draw a diagram PCAD'e has
sense - not comfortable - the fact is
graphical editors. But it was not there;
PC shnye halfwits even before PCAD'a
reached. And the right person would understand that
he's doing. But no - a complete lamer. I
then honored the accompanying article -
complete idiocy - people do not understand
how it works. Now look at the
wider problem. Throughout this ambush
participated in at least three people:
one wills this short article, one of its
coded and placed in the room, the third
signed in circulation (ie, editor). ALL
Of course, the RS-Schnick. Now think
whether or not coincidental that the three
RS-Schnick gathered in one place, one
time - and were not up to par (mildly
speaking). It's, you know, natural.
I was particularly struck by the scheme in PCAD'e -
because to think of it right! -
PCAD use as a graphic
editor. Ie mental debilitation through
RS-ka began to penetrate even in the technical
magazines. If we move at a pace that
we can completely lose their technical
publications. This Zhdanovskaya liquid, such as
chemical weapons are made in USA, may
corrode anything.

   Example number two. Advance reservation,
I lay out a fantasy. APL. Training
launch a torpedo with AI (artificial
intelligence). Programming failure
Reboot mat. software. Included
Artificial intelligence and torpedoes
In-N-BI-P-A-E-T TARGET. As a result, a nickel
receives is the same submarine that her and released.
(First, a weak explosion). Boat nodding,
and because of the shallow depth (100m), hits the
ground. The explosion of ammunition. (Second, strong
explosion). The bulkheads are added as
house of cards.

   Now the analysis. Do you think someone
wrote the software? Correctly. That they are in front of this
read? Correctly, the RS-shnye magazines - and
READ MORE - THEN NOTHING! A would be worth
read, for example, Norbert Wiener, when he
talks about the Fighting application of AI. There
have a specific conclusion that the choice of
PURPOSE AND INAPPROPRIATE charging. This
strategic decision.

   Further, my analysis. Intelligence (regardless
from its origin) is always
implies consciousness. A consciousness is always
Spontaneously, ie, Probabilistically. It is told
a Russian mathematician, opoloumevshy on
old age and bumped into mysticism.
In other words, any AI is unpredictable.

   Let's try to estimate the probability /
Inadequate / Suspense /
Spontaneity. This can be done. Any
people actually take part in
hostilities, knows that about 7-8%
loss - a loss in their own troops from
their own troops. For example, if the pilot
mistakenly select the target, or vice versa -
if the pilot (aircraft) signal is emitted at the
place where the goal is already selected.
Presumably, a similar result
can be obtained using the theory of games (I do not
I own the apparatus of game theory - so
just a guess). By the way, game theory
studied by von Neumann - one of the first
mathematicians - the ideologues
of computer. But he knows at least one
RS-Schnick, what game theory? And she
studied by von Neumann? In the RS-shnyh journals
it will not read - because to sell
There's nothing, and therefore there is no need to write.
Because all of this stink, this blizzard - is
publicity, - or in other words, Zhdanovskaya
liquid. What are these 7-8%? That each
13th torpedo with AI, which "grohnet" on
their own. And this is a rough estimate,
limit for estesstvenno intelligence
who has experience, background.
I wonder how will be trained torpedo
if they self-destruct at the same time? What
criteria of adequacy behavior of AI?

   In the hand-SAM, for example, there is a blocker
"Your / someone else." If the aircraft is missing
such unit, then he knocks - whether it is
three times his own. And such was the case. But in
If blocker is essentially absent
Selection of targets. So there was a lock or not
was it?

   And finally. Who is responsible?
RS-Schnick, who even had not occurred
thought blocker? Or the boss
that after watching Hollywood movies
(The same publicity, a "Matrix"
What is ...), and believing in
infallibility of AI did not think to put
blocker?

   Or maybe look at the problem
wider?

   As Heidegger would say the old man:
"Careful with cybernetics. Soon
understand that this is not so easy. "