---------------------------------------
Track: ...-II
Wu: Macros
---------------------------------------
I saw this text in the newspaper
Plutonium. I don’t even know what to say.
I'll figure it out along the way.
(The source text is not shown here
completely, if anyone is interested, look for it
original)
> Studio Stall: real look.
>
> (c) Alexander Bondarenko
MS> "Realism... And this is a picnic!"
> Before starting global analysis
> of this group, I’ll make a reservation right away: this
> article is not next
> mud-slinging. Its purpose is
>show everyone normal
> spektrumists, how dangerous it is
> "star sickness". And not only for
> themselves, but also for the platform as a whole.
MS> The text is simply terrible. But not with your own
facts, but the idea itself.
I can’t judge how true this is,
since I have not seen these atrocities personally. A
I am not going to believe such texts.
Yes, this text is not the first of its kind
kind. I was also in ZX-News, about MMA. Oh
his destructive activities. Even
the charges are similar.
> If you remember their products, then this is -
> graphic editor "Spriter",
> music player "ZX-Amp" +
> utility for creating libraries for it,
> a modified version of the ALASM assembler, and
> a simple toy "Tower Pod".
MS> Not every spektrumist can
npectbabutb even so short
softology, also spriter and zx-amp
made very high quality. Another thing is
what am I,for example, I don’t use any
but they showed an excellent level of coding
and design and took their rightful place
in the archives of Spectrum software.
> From iron we can only remember
> mouse controller (ps/2 and catfish), since
>he's the only one who got it
> distribution. Besides this, there were also
> products: monitor for hacking programs
> "STD", several Gifts, controller
> hard drive.
MS> Quite serious developments.
> Typical "Spectrum team". But
> this is at first glance. Closer
> once you get to know them, you start
> see something completely different. This is obvious
> not a typical team. I'll try this
> prove in the following.
MS> I wonder what should
appear typical
Spectrum team? Try again later
reflect.
> First of all, I wantintroduce you
> with the members of this group themselves.
> 1. Evgeniy Stakhov, aka "Evg". Encoder
> (author STD), the only one in the group
> ironworker. One can say about him: no
>successful in body, but successful in brains. Very
>short, plump
> physique, "bespectacled", looks like him
>give him a maximum of 16 years, although in reality he
> has long since passed the second decade.
MS> It’s clear what you’re paying attention to
you pay. I wonder if you're perfect and
what should an ideal person be like?
I also look young at 20. So
What, am I now an atypical spektrumist?
> Smart, savvy, good at hardware and code
> drags very well. Disadvantages: everything
> he praises his own, criticizes someone else’s, and
> sometimes it looks like it from the outside
> banal. Considers himself "the smartest"
> and the rest are "fools"
> enviable conceit, it happens, it’s also
> proud (very original
> feature of the psyche).
MS> What, alienCan't you criticize? I
sometimes, too, while watching other people’s programs
I criticize if I see what could have been
do better. I also admire
brilliant coding tricks if I find them
something new. True, criticism happens
healthy, but sometimes not.
> Constantly intrudes in conversation
> trouble", so he doesn’t get along with
> ordinary guys. Crazy in love with
> RS considers this platform to be the one on
> which needs to be equal.
MS> Oh, just like ours stupid! ;)
> 2. Pavel Stakhov, aka "Capry". By
> outward appearance - a copy of his brother
> (see point 1), except that
> doesn't wear glasses.
MS> Look how much o tells him
appearance of the stall's people. And this is when
that with your worldview this is not
should tell you nothing.
You find faults in people and in
on this basis you doconclusions. And if they
fundamentally wrong?
>grew his hair long (in the style
> informal).
MS> Oh, just like ours Gunfighter! ;)
> By nature - the same as in
> the previous paragraph, but not so much
> in an explicit form. Also judging by
>everything, "pussy fanatic", if
> take a look at his software.
MS> You can take it from someone else's platform
only good things. Or am I wrong?
> 3. Stas Aristov, or Stanly. Author
> Tower Pod games, but at the moment
> gave up on coding, but is studying
> graphics. Mid-level artist.
> Appearance - a copy of Evgeny Stakhov,
> but of dense build. Also "bespectacled".
> The character and disadvantages are similar,
>except that he loves
>tell people what they thinkand
> create whole discussions on this topic,
>what causes a negative reaction in
> "objects" of your discussion.
MS> And I even wrote a letter to this guy
wrote. And there’s nothing like that in his answer
noticed. Directness is sometimes too
ok. I also loved to organize
discussions about certain personalities,
so what, now I'm not worthy to be
spektrumist?
These shortcomings are common to many. Here
both education and social factors play a role
Wednesday And you bring everything under glasses.
Maybe this is already a consequence?
Look, optical brothers, what software is in
they did their time.
> The same can be said about him
> the following: "he takes loans, not for others
> gives, does not return debts." Extremely
> ungrateful. He is deceitful and loves to gossip.
> His article in "Paragraph" this
> proof. Raising your group
> like "gods on the Spectrum", he is not
> less "lowered" other spektrumists
> our city.MS> I was thinking - what if a person
he doesn’t come to you with his problems,
what right do you have to interfere with
with your advice and with your wrong
muponohumahuem?
A person, unlike many elite
(in quotes) stagers wrote the text in
A paragraph, and this is real support
editors. He did at least something.
> 4. Evgeny Popkov, aka Mixer.
> Mediocre encoder, adapts to
> disk tape software, as well as
> adjusts the software with
> turbo loaders so that it goes to
> Quorums with crooked controllers.
> Appearance - the same again (Here
> where is the paradox!..). Naturally, too
> wears glasses. Character has
> friendly, but can easily
> lose your temper over nonsense. He gets arrogant
> almost the same as
> the above comrades. Maybe
> "throw". Friendship with him is only real
> at a distance.
MS> And we had such a spektrumist -
Serg,the best and only one at that time
artist on Speck.
I scored on Speck, fucked, I ask for
expression, local girls, let down
abortion. Some may not have children later
there will be.
Who is better - Mixer or Sserg?
> 5. Artyom Kirdyashkin, aka Blazer.
> Musician, tries his hand at coding.
> In appearance, and also in character
> fundamentally different from his classmates.
> This somewhat infuriates his teammates,
> to the question "Where is Tyoma?" they answer with
> with undisguised irony "And he's somewhere with
> walking around with girls." By the way, according to
> about girls. None of them
>the above four "bespectacled men"
> no. Draw conclusions.
MS> Let's do it. At least on theirs
there will be no abortion,
lost souls and broken hearts.
There are many points of view, but
an incorrect worldview is only possible
alone. Also, by the way, wrong. Wait, the guys will grow up, crazy
get married and get married.
> Being a former classmate of Stas
> Aristova, and is unlikely to delve into
> the crux of the matter, to Stas’s question “Well,
> let's sign you up with us?", he replied
> "Yes." It is obvious that such an answer was
> given for lack of better prospects,
> because in his area of residence, except
> Stall no longer has any groups.
MS> And what's wrong with that? Would you be in
his situation, did he act differently? Or right away
Would you sell your Spec?
>They only see in other people
> shortcomings, and they try in every possible way
> hyperbolize and present.
MS> As you can see, this disadvantage also applies to you
inherent
> Beginners are called "lamers"
>they make fun of them.
MS> We were all lamer once.
Personally, I have nothing wrong with the word lamer
I don't see. On the contrary, it is even an incentive -
reach a certain level and
show that some are wrong.
> What can we say here? Very
>it's sad that in our society there is
> such individuals. They are an example of
> what spektrumists should not be.
MS> We can also say that it is very
It's sad that in our society there are
other individuals. They are an example of what
You can't be human. But this is the topic
a separate conversation.
> Obvious physical disabilities
> these people in terms of height and vision,
> seems to be the root of this
> problem.
MS> Oops! Nevermind!
> Deep down, feeling
> "freaks", "Stull's glasses"
>are trying in every possible way to prove that this is not
> yes. But not for yourself, but for those around you. And this is
> they have already reached the point of idiocy. Jealous
> other, normal people, they get angry,
> and try to find at least the slightest
> disadvantages, so there are definitely some
> express exaggerations in order to humiliate
> person and rise slightly above him.
> Their own merits and successes, they
> used to flaunting, too
> exaggerating and embellishing in every possible way.
> Criticizing everything and everyone, they try
>show that they are the smartest and only them
>doing everything right.
> Having consolidated, they begin
>wage a silent war against the rest
> peace. They meanly and unnoticedly throw at others
> "zapadly".
MS> Quite transparent for comments.
> Having rummaged through the literature on psychology,
>I came to the conclusion that everything is obvious
> signs of “collective schizophrenia”.
> This is not a disease of an individual -
> this is the psychosis of their company. Alone
> they behave quietly and without standing out.
> But when they gather, I’ll already
> told.MS> Let me remind you about the article
Litvinov in ZX-Review. Also diagnoses
installed...
> I would like to add a little about places
> carrying out sysopok. One of them is
> Mixer's apartment is
> homeless person. So with the "bespectacled people"
> smart enough to arrange sissops there,
> not only that, they’re new there too
> result. People, it's natural
> frightens, and some people leave again.
> And what’s also interesting is that the “new” B
> MAINLY lead to this apartment.
MS> I wonder if they can choose
other living conditions? Chic
apartments with marble columns...
>Apparently, "Stull's glasses"
> looking for their own kind, “filtering out”
> those who are not considered them. By
> rumors that have flown recently, to them
> joined (not currently
> representative of their group, but on
> happens quite often at parties) another one
> individual in "their style".MS> Imagine a large meeting
people. And two people came to this meeting
person - rocker and gopnik. Are you really
you naively think that a rocker will look for
gopniks for yourself, and vice versa?
The hell with it! The rocker will join pokepam, and
Gopnik - to his own kind.
Everything is logical.
> Draw conclusions about the Studio Stall group.
MS> To conclude what you wrote
clearly not enough.
But we can draw conclusions about you too.
> STD-3: the best of the best.
>
> I'm more than 100% sure the title
> made you think. What is this
> such a thing - STD? And already number 3?
> And it couldn’t be any other way, because this
> creation “lives” only on
> the only onecomputer all over the world.
> Exclusive model in a single
> instance - "Quorum bу Evg/STALL".
> Models welded to such an extent
> that the sticker "Pentium III. Intel
> inside" on her keyboard, coming soon
> correspond to reality. A
> this computer is in the only
> place - at the author’s home, on the table!..
MS> Yeah, now you're condemning what
does a person write software for his car? Not
is this funny? Moreover, to have
a fancy computer - is it really that bad?
> Therefore, my advice to you: do not try
> protect your software. "It doesn't matter, we
>break the security and release the hacked one
> version! (ts)Evg/STALL"
MS> How will I protect my software?
Yes, copy for your health!
If anyone needs to break something, he is
will do without the help of std.
In general, the commercial basis of the project
takes away something very important, inherent
softwarefried.
>What did you think? That life is a fairy tale?
MS> You described your world in which you live
you are alone. Therefore, discussions on this topic
are meaningless. These are your problems, andsolve them
them himself.
Share your thoughts about the article