Sitting on a quiet evening I decided to look
ZX-NEW3! And what do you think I'm talking about there?
discovered? And there was the next one
article: "Review of magazines". Yes you guys
we tried! Even though it is written there that
A friend is not the one who praises, but the one who scolds!
Well, of course, if he scolds in moderation. I think
that I’m not the only one, Tobish is the author of the magazine,
which you described there (gave an assessment)
So, let's start from the beginning:
1. Not at all interesting to read, etc.
Well, here you are a little wrong, why?
“absolutely” is not interesting, because people
they read not just, but with a certain in-
interesting. There are such articles in previous
rooms that have not reached their level yet
not one of the magazines that currently exists!
2. Insufficient interface. With this inter-
With your face you are already sitting me in one place!
You yourself are no better!
3. Not a bad application. Yes, not bad, but
very good. Again, up to the level
there is no such application as in my journal
no one has arrived. Look at your place.
position, it’s outdated who knows when,
and you insert it, they ask: “Why?”
4.The first number was terrible! First of all
Do you remember when this was? Yes
Now, if you remember, it’s a little surprising
think with your brains. At that moment, he was alone
him from the best (since he took his own
an idea, and not again ripped off from Spect-
rofon and Zx-Format). Well, you guys compared
fuck your finger, you should take it and compare -
Whether the demo of 1993-1994 is with the current ones!5. For some reason, hidden parts were made! What
it means for some reason, it is necessary, it is necessary! So that it would be
what to look at, who like the texts!
6. As for the sources, the only way is
No praise. Thanks for that at least!
Yes, our letter has already been published -
number in your journal. The font is still mine!!!
And you broke the intruder. And about the words:
"Our magazine is not designed so simply...
then (especially number 3).
SO WHAT IS AWESOME, not so much
It's just that you are jokers.
Don't get me wrong - this is just
elaboration of the material that you
they got crazy there.
One minus in our magazine is
what we have: there are errors, typos and
insufficient literacy in writing
understanding of textual material.
Sincerely, Alexander Vorozhkin!
(Waiting for an answer?!)
Share your thoughts about the article