Buzz #19 18 августа 2000

Разборки

Showdown - Uncle Sam VS Paracels.

buzz



(C) Paracels ^ EI


                    The disease progresses,

                   or Curieuse Uncle SAM'A



                    Zamorochki continue


   Frankly, all that I'll write, you can safely publish a 
already used the title "first symptoms". Not I am doing this 
only because I am afraid to be called in panic unoriginal 
phenomenal personality of our city - Uncle Sam'om.


   This great grandfather so smartly slaps his articles,
even I, still young, a man becomes difficult to follow
for those who are at this time, Sam has chosen its target ... A 
target, meanwhile, had accumulated enough. Not as much as, 
probably, Sam'u wanted. But for the good of incest with his own 
psyche, As a result of which came to light a little child of 
debility in as a regular on the pages zamorochki ZX-Pilot'a, 
he, like okalos, this is quite enough. Me with my 
naivno-yunosheskim glance to life, of course, should not have 
to climb to where only adults are permitted - and so clever - 
uncles. Odnako still I would venture, because, you know, 
bothered, when some old, sorry, pal, not something that teaches 
us all, but simply mixes with anything just want to, and shit - 
including. 

   Too aggressive entry turned out. And what can you do? Young 
people today are not because she went ... The only pity is that 
some do not understand. Including our Uncle Sam.



                        Morning in a madhouse


   What this time Sam had done on the pages now the 36 th
ZX-Pilot'a? And, strictly speaking, nothing new - the same 
impotent tears with or without cause and that same paranoid 
concern fictional problems that he himself, and Sam decides. It 
is true that somewhat resembles the morning in a madhouse? (Do 
not tell "Mental hospital" because everything he writes Sam, 
otherwise than as a madhouse, can not be called. Let me explain 
why.) 

   Poor our colleague UnBeliever! For what services he was 
awarded such an honor - to become the first victim of an 
omniscient Sam'a? For what that, with imaginative thinking and 
experience, has written the truth about the settling party type 
Di: Halt'a? For that, do not roll in this shit 
sobstvennolichno, dared to warn others of similar Errors? 
Probably for this. You bet he is not guilty! Sam-Sam is up to 
So far from these feces to be washed can not - must at least 
they cast aside the other, and that in fact hurt, honestly. And 
throws! Covering a marasmic explanations about "youthful 
ambitions," who "and the rod of the" very advanced "young 
people". Well at least have ambitions of the rod, but not what 
Sam rushes ... 

   A critique, writes Sam is really very easy. I
would even say - too much. However, here he contradicts himself 
oh how! The very fact wrote then that criticism and 
kritikanstvo - two completely opposite things, and, critics - 
harder isskusstvo and kritikanstvo - that the game on a pipe. I 
wonder what then now do I? Criticism? I'm afraid, Sam does not 
think so. Kritikanstvom? Sam gleefully exclaims: "Yeah, the 
goat!" Just that you and deal! "Really?" Surely it become 
something different from mine? .. Let's just say: I criticize 
without giving counter-arguments. Why did not cite? And why Sam 
does not? Or it senile-marasmic tips can be called an argument??

Rather - fakami! So it turns out like it is not an argument, but
not yet Fakie ...

   Once all this is diluted, just like water on the brain. Maybe
Sam and her ... No, hardly. Rather, it is simply premature 
aging - with every case, though extremely rare, and even then 
considered a medical phenomenon. Looks like Sam was lucky. 
Look, and this morning he will soon meet out of his house, and 
... In general, you know where. 


                         Children with morons


   Well, yes it's me dreaming!

   Sam will long be "happy" me with his wonderful
revelations and unsuccessful inventions bikes that
more like at Shabby scooter, or rather, - Samokat,
that sam katit balloons for everyone. (Well, to what are great
pun came out - he did not nalyubuyus!) Yes, that's at least one 
of them. (Citation in our country has not yet prohibited by law 
to copyright - use the case!)


--- [(C) Uncle Sam / ZX-Pilot # 36 
]------------------------------<... > "I want to advise the 
editors precede any information from correspondents or from a 
footnote that "the resulting information is a subjective 
viewpoint and is not the ultimate truth. "

-------------------------------------------------- ----[ cut] -

    Want to ask why he or editor Sam ZXPilot'a not done so? 
Article or Sam - an objective point of view and the ultimate 
truth?? However, the answers to these Questions I can not wait. 
It is important to another. Namely - is aware of whether Sam is 
about what say? In my opinion, no. And if you realize that all 
of us can boldly express their outrage directly to him in his 
intelligent face. Therefore, as the proposal he equates all 
readers to preterm children imbitsilam who are not able to 
understand what than their cargoes from the pages of newspapers 
and magazines, ready to take all at face value, if not 
treasured inscription: "This is pure garbage written-and-a 
subjective and not a clean-ah no, the mother yours, the truth 
in any instance there is fucking. "Kids-morons raised his eyes 
to this inscription, read it and calmed down: "Well slaf-r-a 
god-hoo! Doing so th dtya-e-Days-uh Mona and not-e-ver We say 
... It tt-one's .. " 

   The question is, Why this insanity? I'm, like, healthy
was born. And you?


                      And one more bike


   - AX! Yes you have a clever, eh? " - Sam asks sarcastically.

   - Yes, kind of like ... - I replied, embarrassed.

   - So, get!

   Get, I'm good, not in the nose and between your teeth (I'm 
still not luck as Werewolves'u), and the following maxim:


--- [(C) Uncle Sam / ZX-Pilot # 36 
]------------------------------<... > Of course, everyone 
should have his own point of view, because viewpoint of the 
individual - is the imposition of aggregate Thought processes 
that depend on the degree of intelligence on subjective and 
(or) the objective reasons for this vital individual.

-------------------------------------------------- ----[ cut] -

   I confess that after reading it the first time, I felt 
complete chode and it is possible to put Sam in merit. Then 
something until I heard a sense of this clutter buzzwords. 
However, not came another - the purpose of their use. What is 
it? The manner of communication (God forbid this!), The desire 
to seem clever (why? And so because everything in sight! (Great 
big smiley face, 8 ))))))))))))))))))))))))))) or just verbal 
diarrhea? Is not it easier to say: "Every person can (and 
should not, Sam!) Be a point of view, because it is - its 
indisputable right? "Anyway why it was necessary to say what 
everybody knows? .. 

   - Bicycles, my friend, you prehoroshy!

   - I know - he skomunizdil ...


                    "Prinitspialny" marasmus


   Next, let me go through the remaining pearls of Sam, which 
in this opus is full of. 

   One of them - apparently unsuccessful attempt to appear 
smarter than you really are, and simultaneously - desire to 
justify Print your idiotic datsibao on starnitsah newspaper and 
plug thus possible opponents.


   However, failed ... How's my favorite, "Novaya Gazeta" 
fighting with marasmic vain attempts of power to make life 
worse, so "Buzz" (in my, and hopefully, not just the face) will 
fight same vain attempts of our Kovrov lamer teach the whole 
world how to live.


   Distinguished writers and editors, then - for you! "

--- [(C) Uncle Sam / ZX-Pilot # 36 
]------------------------------<... > I'll start with what is 
supposedly "principled" and editors The authors of various 
articles on the subject. And now these same "Principled" 
editors and writers struggled smash "Inessential" editors and 
authors. I would like to ask such a very "principled" friends 
(or master?) - and what your business, and who writes and 
reviews?? Your business to raise cry when discovered explicit 
or implicit FALSIFICATION facts, the open propaganda of 
anything illegal and forbidden in our country.

-------------------------------------------------- ----[ cut] -

   Well, nothing I do not understand - at Sam with us that 
God's grace, whether descended, or that it has so many clever 
books read ???!!! And you, Gentlemen, "principal" (and, simply 
put, having, as any normal person, his own point of view) and 
editors authors understand where your place? Got it? Then sit 
and blather, since Sam will not allow it! 

   Condemning themselves to a painful death, I would venture to 
ask Sam: "You then consider myself" inessential "what?" Based 
on the He also said, guess what's the answer. And here arises

and second, very important question: "Sam, and what your 
business, and who what say? Why are you on UnBeliever'a snarls? 
Or, do you think He wrote a lie? So what are you in that it had 
caught not? Do not thrust it to him for his advocacy snout? "Do 
not you know? A I'm guessing here. Do not you do that just 
because UnBeliever rights. But you enrages that some, for your 
notions, boy, not having been where were you even dare to write 
something. And especially you angry from what he writes the 
truth. He does not write anything wrong, he simply presents his 
point of view, which, thy unfortunately coincides with reality. 
It's not forbidden by law, to which you so eagerly referred! 
And you like it oh enrages! Infuriates so that you give free 
rein to his embittered mind mud and water all under the guise 
of years wiser everyday experience, which, frankly, more like a 
sickly senile plaque of gray matter in your head. 

   In light of all that I want to ask, What same principles 
guided by you, when you wrote your article? Or are you really 
so nobly unprincipled? .. 


                        Instead of an epilogue


   I have nothing to advise you, because I just do not know what
You can help your old man's anger, progressing from
room to room. Maybe you just become a kinder and easier to stop 
and, finally, to torment us all our unnecessary effusion on 
pages ZX-PILOT'a? In my opinion, worth a try. After all, 
understand, nobody would tolerate those mud baths, in which you 
bravo dipping individual (the guilty, in your opinion, in nearly

all the deadly sins) personalities. After all, as you yourself 
write ... 

--- [(C) Uncle Sam / ZX-Pilot # 36 
]------------------------------<... > Subjective information 
should go a separate item and MUST be clearly stamped that it 
is someone's point view and the reader is free to join it or not

join. Otherwise, such "publications" is automatically
acquire the status of the "yellow press" and "tabloid sheet," 
which means that they are flawed. As I understand it, many open 
their Electronic publishing is not even thinking about 
responsibility bed on their shoulders, they just ignore it. As 
a result, obtained no newspaper or magazine, and shout for 
watering the dirt his personal enemies and even to strangers,

having their views.
-------------------------------------------------- ----[ cut] -

   Do not see what you write about yourself??