---------------------------------------
Denis Tokarczuk
Generation Z#04
-----------------
(C) O.S.A.
And finally GenZ has pleased his audience
Lonnikov next release. Came out but-
measures, albeit with a “slight” delay, but
the volume of materials and their quality are justified -
avoids any delays.
The first thing that caught my eye was
appeared content, divided into different
affairs, from whichGenZcould be called
to write a magazine if you don’t look at the
newspaper-like 64-character shell and
hard to read font :). Design, style and
elaboration of small details isfrom-
stands outGenZamong the “general” background of others
publications in terms of design. They say
The author of the article tried to remember everything that
published for Spectrumfor 2002. Recall
nil with a kind word even our modest
edition:). However, it seems to me that
in ANALYSIS, sometimes used by the author,
inappropriate in this article. Although no -
actually published, the author gives non-
large reviews, but general analysis,
some final generalizing assessment,
deliveries from previous years, ten-
dents this year - all this is missing.
But even without this, the article is interesting though
would be that the author was not too lazy to remember
last year, collect and review a bunch
last year's software.
News. The section is huge and original.
Such presentation of news, that is,
I'm not in first personI remember. Unity
important - the articles are not very well edited -
tified.
Census news. First results,
first successes. 91 questionnaire - this is already pro-
breakthrough for Spectrum,taking into account that
usually social events are supported
20-30 spectrumists. But of course for
shares of this scale are not very
and a lot. In the end, you might think
that there are a hundred spektrumists left - NOT
I BELIEVE! It seems to me that there are at least you
hundreds - the problem is that not all of them
active, and not up to all programs and but-
News arrive promptly. I really hope
that in the near future the questionnaires will start flowing
whoa! Good luck in RESPECT'e - this is not easy
com business. The main thing is not to give up!
And again party. Not a bad section, especially
especially in the “places” where the review is carried out
works These articles also contain
assessment,and analysis of what has happened lately
has become a unique phenomenon.
Software review. "Carrot and stick" -characteristic
Tepuctuka of this section in a nutshell.
The only thing that “gets in the way” is the huge
a large number of typos, especially
"sinful" is this note about Bird andParagraph.
As for reviews ofZXTime - save-
Thank you for the good words addressed to us. And again
forced to “justify” - material, post-
dedicated to demos from Cafe'2002 (zxt#10) -
NON-SERIOUS material, that's what he called it -
xia"frivolous discussion."In addition,
I was very pleased with the greater “extensiveness”
reviews, and not those two or three words, as in
previous GenZ's.
In the ZX dimension. In general, the material is in-
tepeceh, exceptsome not-
honors."Hobbits" and "Specialists" - not
Spectrum clones! I don't know about Hobbits, but
Specialist I saw with my own eyes - this
far from Spectrumand not even Spectrum-
clone Firstly, it is incompatible with Spec-
tpymom in no way. Secondly, he
"b/w" graphics (even without border)
slightly higher resolution than ours
pet. Thirdly, the “heart” is Soviet
analoguei8080 - processorVM80. Yes, and the scheme
motexhuka is completely non-spectrum.
The article also states that
then the magazine RADIO would publish diagrams
Spectrum clones. In this edition Spectrum
room was not very welcoming, they worked in
in another direction - we promoted projects,
not even supported by the state -
It’s worth remembering only PK-86and Orion.
By the way, the latter had a very good
xue characteristics, but he could not win
dit Spectrum - some say because
he showed up late; others that he
was doomed...
Phyyyyyy! Two and a half hours of fun
solid reading - this is GenZ#4. Save-
for its authors. But a review of
GenZ#2... I didn’t take my words back
heaven :) - that’s what I thought about the second number, but
I don’t think so much about the fourth one anymore :). I hope
that future issues will be released
without the slightest delay :), and not bezinte-
river Good luck!
MSF#26
------------
(C) Macros
If this number MSF was not called
MSF, and Lamergy - I would without the slightest
hesitation said that it was written alone
one of its first authors. However, that's all
same MSF,but not as interesting as
its previous issues.
The number came out "in the clouds",fi-
losofskim. Smells like doom and
irritability... Strange article under
meaningful name "open let-
ter", includes a paradox.
Although a more precise definition is meaning
keep on Lamergy, which I already talked about...
A sad trend...
FullPull#2,#3
-------------------------
(C) Maxx&Tresh&MUR&Crash
Continues to re-
go out periodically and
this newspaper is from the "wild ones
spektrumistov":).Co-
holding absolutely
not serious, however
edition, judging by -
clicks to him,
it's getting pretty
popular. 
To Mahkh> All the same
"glitched" :) Delayer,
since I sent my
message from yours
box. 
Body #3F
------------------
(C) Smokers Team
Fun episode :). The main thing is camokpu-
Typical review of warez in the style of Wrecker :)
"Loads" Freeman's are funny. However, in
places where he talks about "ZX and RS"
somewhat wrong. Not RS - Mazda (although
and he too :)), and, as they usually say, - Bindo-
vz mazday,which is certainly true. Yes
and "C or assembler?" - arguments in
the benefit of the first is somewhat incorrect,
since the compiler, even at this level,
close to low-level languages, not
can provide even ninety percent
high performance - there is still
there are “ballasts” in the form of extra uhctpyk-
tions and data. A"tube processors" :)
I won’t even comment, because
I think that Freeman he himself knows that he is not
right
Next. Interview - revelations of famous
ny “sceners”, squeezed out of them without prompt-
lationWrecker :). In general, everything is like
always! Body in its indestructible form :)
style!
- - -
In addition to all this, they released ACEditor0.71
can provide even ninety percent
high performance - there is still
there are “ballasts” in the form of extra uhctpyk-
tions anddata. A"tube processors" :)
I won’t even comment, because
I think that Freeman he himself knows that he is not
right
Next. Interview - revelations of famous
ny “sceners”, squeezed out of them without prompt-
lationWrecker :). In general, everything is like
always! Body in its indestructible form :)
style!
- - -
In addition to all this, they released ACEditor0.71
from the prolific "hero father":) Alone Co-
der'a, Best View 2.16 from no less fruitful
twisted Ivan Roshchina, Noter1.5 from Bugsy,
and something else, you can’t remember everything :)...
what is all this andThe author of the article tried to remember everything that published for Spectrumfor 2002. Recall nil with a kind word even our modest edition:). However, it seems to me that in ANALYSIS, sometimes used by the author, inappropriate in this article. Although no - actually published, the author gives non- large reviews, but general analysis, some final generalizing assessment, deliveries from previous years, ten- dents this year - all this is missing. But even without this, the article is interesting though would be that the author was not too lazy to remember last year, collect and review a bunch last year's software. News. The section is huge and original. Such presentation of news, that is, I'm not in first personI remember. Unity important - the articles are not very well edited - tified. Census news. First results, first successes. 91 questionnaire - this is already pro- breakthrough for Spectrum,taking into account that usually social events are supported 20-30 spectrumists. But of course for shares of this scale are not very and a lot. In the end, you might think that there are a hundred spektrumists left - NOT I BELIEVE! It seems to me that there are at least you hundreds - the problem is that not all of them active, and not up to all programs and but- News arrive promptly. I really hope that in the near future the questionnaires will start flowing whoa! Good luck in RESPECT'e - this is not easy com business. The main thing is not to give up! And again party. Not a bad section, especially especially in the “places” where the review is carried out works These articles also contain assessment,and analysis of what has happened lately has become a unique phenomenon. Software review. "Carrot and stick" -characteristic Tepuctuka of this section in a nutshell. The only thing that “gets in the way” is the huge a large number of typos, especially "sinful" is this note about Bird andParagraph. As for reviews ofZXTime - save- Thank you for the good words addressed to us. And again forced to “justify” - material, post- dedicated to demos from Cafe'2002 (zxt#10) - NON-SERIOUS material, that's what he called it - xia"frivolous discussion."In addition, I was very pleased with the greater “extensiveness” reviews, and not those two or three words, as in previous GenZ's. In the ZX dimension. In general, the material is in- tepeceh, exceptsome not- honors."Hobbits" and "Specialists" - not Spectrum clones! I don't know about Hobbits, but Specialist I saw with my own eyes - this far from Spectrumand not even Spectrum- clone Firstly, it is incompatible with Spec- tpymom in no way. Secondly, he "b/w" graphics (even without border) slightly higher resolution than ours pet. Thirdly, the “heart” is Soviet analoguei8080 - processorVM80. Yes, and the scheme motexhuka is completely non-spectrum. The article also states that then the magazine RADIO would publish diagrams Spectrum clones. In this edition Spectrum room was not very welcoming, they worked in in another direction - we promoted projects, not even supported by the state - It’s worth remembering only PK-86and Orion. By the way, the latter had a very good xue characteristics, but he could not win dit Spectrum - some say because he showed up late; others that he was doomed... Phyyyyyy! Two and a half hours of fun solid reading - this is GenZ#4. Save- for its authors. But a review of GenZ#2... I didn’t take my words back heaven :) - that’s what I thought about the second number, but I don’t think so much about the fourth one anymore :). I hope that future issues will be released without the slightest delay :), and not bezinte- river Good luck! MSF#26 ------------ (C) Macros If this number MSF was not called MSF, and Lamergy - I would without the slightest hesitation said that it was written alone one of its first authors. However, that's all same MSF,but not as interesting as its previous issues. The number came out "in the clouds",fi- losofskim. Smells like doom and irritability... Strange article under meaningful name "open let- ter", includes a paradox. Although a more precise definition is meaningmusic - only 50% yc-
nexa newspaper. Well, these
50% worked out by the author -
Our newspapers are very and
quite good.
Now let's touch on
others 50%. That is,
actual materials.
As I already said, their
the choice is quite extensive -
ny, therefore prokom-
I ment them selectively.
Results of the year. I would
named this material
retrospective of the year.
keep on Lamergy, which I already talked about... A sad trend... FullPull#2,#3 ------------------------- (C) Maxx&Tresh&MUR&Crashfish porridge, involved
a good tenth
ka thoughts. Perhaps
this is the only
article of all, for-
serving star
great attention andana-
Lisa. But analyze
create style -
this is not the answer.
What does all this want?
tel say Macro?
Nothing? Maybe
although unlikely...
Is everything pointless?..
Other materials -
same cycle
thoughts... It's sad, but
MSF has now become similar
Continues to re-Body #3F ------------------ (C) Smokers Team Fun episode :). The main thing is camokpu- Typical review of warez in the style of Wrecker :) "Loads" Freeman's are funny. However, in places where he talks about "ZX and RS" somewhat wrong. Not RS - Mazda (although and he too :)), and, as they usually say, - Bindo- vz mazday,which is certainly true. Yes and "C or assembler?" - arguments in the benefit of the first is somewhat incorrect, since the compiler, even at this level, close to low-level languages, not can provide even ninety percent high performance - there is still there are “ballasts” in the form of extra uhctpyk- tions and data. A"tube processors" :) I won’t even comment, because I think that Freeman he himself knows that he is not right Next. Interview - revelations of famous ny “sceners”, squeezed out of them without prompt- lationWrecker :). In general, everything is like always! Body in its indestructible form :) style! - - - In addition to all this, they released ACEditor0.71 can provide even ninety percent high performance - there is still there are “ballasts” in the form of extra uhctpyk- tions anddata. A"tube processors" :) I won’t even comment, because I think that Freeman he himself knows that he is not right Next. Interview - revelations of famous ny “sceners”, squeezed out of them without prompt- lationWrecker :). In general, everything is like always! Body in its indestructible form :) style! - - - In addition to all this, they released ACEditor0.71 from the prolific "hero father":) Alone Co- der'a, Best View 2.16 from no less fruitful twisted Ivan Roshchina, Noter1.5 from Bugsy, and something else, you can’t remember everything :)...
Share your thoughts about the article