Letter No. 290 - Vologda

160035

          Good afternoon, Vyacheslav!

   Why didn't you answer the previous one?
letter?  Or you didn't receive the previous messages
newspaper measure?  Please answer, otherwise I
I think the previous letter got lost and
it didn’t dawn on you, but you’ll be offended by me
huddle and think badly of me.
   The most important question is, do you want high
stupid as a competition sponsor or
no?
   With this I say goodbye and still wait for an answer.

   Best regards N.........



160035 12/24/01

           Dear N......!

   1).  Your letters were received: 04.11.01;
01/19/01;  12/19/01.  Delays in responses
are related to the time of decision making and not
necessary actions for coordination (co-
ordination) of the actions themselves.  ("Sponsor-
yours").

   2).  Regarding the competition, see previous page.
real letter. The decision has not changed. Freebie
- this is debauchery (theft, e-theism, -co-
ren -vr-, -thief-;  - fluent vowels -o-,
-e-.  They explain it to you like a grammarian. This
"traces of metaphysics" XV-XVI centuries. in Russian
language.

   3). There are a number of proposals.
   3.1.  Why don't you take up publishing
send letters with my comments (((((( -
Greek  line) on them from "Open Letters"?
Right from 1999. Information not
outdated, moreover, relevance only
grows over time. Your benefit is age
the regularity of newspaper publication melts and decreases
There is no time between releases, because materialsalways in stock. Analytical developments
cost more than your diarrhea, which circulates
lyrates in the sewer (Internet) about
Spectrum.
   3.2.  Exchange (barter) of your hectares is possible
z to the numbers of "Radio Amateur". Know that
what is published there is your responsibility.
ity as an editor, - regardless of
how you feel about the publications themselves
yam.  The scheme is as follows: You give me THREE next
issues of the newspaper, I’ll tell you another “Radiolu-
beater".
   3.3.  Your decision is needed regarding
photocopying of your newspapers according to the conditions,
proposed in the letter. A clear
solution.

                                  (c) Nemo