160035 03/11/02.
Hello Vyacheslav!
I hasten to know your opinion about the layout
questionnaire. It's attached. On this occasion
I have a few suggestions and comments for you
ny.
Suggestions:
1. Distribute the questionnaire as it is
you see it now, i.e. on a separate A4
leaf. Information about the questionnaire will be published
forged in the newspaper "Paragraph" itself, with which
A questionnaire will be distributed.
2. Specially for your distribution
tion of the questionnaire, i.e. regardless of the newspaper "Ab-
zats" I propose to distribute in the same
form, but print information about the form with
the other side of the sheet.
3. But the most important thing, probably, is
position The questionnaire should be distributed specifically to
this very A4 sheet, so that its people will
filled it up and sent it off. The phrase "Write out the table-
beep the numbers..." we remove. Just mine to me-
The truth is that many people have mother laziness,
and if they are also forced to rewrite everything new
measure of questions, then 30-50 percent of respondents
we will lose dents. Secondly, if we
offered their forms to fill out, then you-
at least the toy is that they will be easier
process.
4. If my proposals do not suit you,
Well, I'm waiting for yours. This is the only reason I will publish
forge a questionnaire.
Now some comments.
Question "7" is not entirely clear. For me,
for example, there are publications that have convinced me
paradise, but if I answer “Yes”, then it will be
means that I am satisfied with everything.Apparently
you need to be a little more specific: “Yes.
tell me which ones." The same goes for question "9".
For example, if this is a magazine, then naturally
"cursor system" if, if commander,
then "ala Novton". May need to be specified
in what, because what software? The question is not clear
“15” “once in...”, but what is not clear.
In question "20" the answer is "Up to 26 hours", I
corrected to "Up to 24 hours". I also think
that the answer "12 o'clock" should be replaced with "Until
12 o'clock." Again, I judge by myself. For the computer
I use the computer for more than 2 hours, but not more
over 12.
That's basically all. I'm waiting for your speed
the fastest answer. Correct the questionnaire and
bark.
Best regards N.
P.S. I have the opportunity, completely free-
latno, i.e. at my expense, send you by
50 similar (ready-made) questionnaires.
I can also send writing paper to
which completed a questionnaire about a kilogram,
again at my expense. All this requires you
This is the solution. I'm waiting.
03/11/2002.
160035 03/30/02.
Dear N!
1. Your letter was received on 03/21/02.
2. Regarding proposals for the questionnaire.
2.1. The version you sent is in
In principle, it fits, but...
2.2. It would be better to type it up on A5 (=
1/2 A4 / printed) with reverse, - pe-
Chat and paper cost money. You write that
ready to print 50 pcs. You made a mistake
by about an order of magnitude. In order for the data
were reliable (even inin some sense)
statistically it is necessary to have at least 100 per-
completed questionnaires. Losses must be taken into account
on: idiots (emulators / networkers -
their profiles will be rejected as inadequate
cotton wool - THEY ARE NOT USERS
Sp-machines, some of the questionnaires will be late, some will be
dey will not respond, those who INDEPENDENTLY
fill out - "...written out in a column" - for
convenience of processing must be transferred to
standard form. [By the way, the phrase “write out-
those in a column..." must not be removed, but
replace with: "... If you have knowledge
who are users of Sp-machines, then remove
for them a photocopy of the application form or offer
fill out on a separate sheet, "... WRITING OUT
COLUMN..." ] insert post-
le ("proper name, or phrase-
nie").
2.3.1. Regarding question 7: the train has left, -
RL will already publish it like this.
2.3.2. Likewise.
2.3.3. In question 15 "once in..." for-
change to "once a month".
2.3.4. Well, why was it corrected to 24?
hours? Actually it's the same thing...
it’s just that the questionnaire is more sincere, - less official -
ciosis. There is no need to correct this, except
Moreover, an indirect link to the "ZX-F" profile.
If someone doesn’t understand this, so much the better.
she. In general, it is better to change question 20,
removing points 20.1 - 20.4 (i.e. the answer will be
not a tick, but a number, resp. (R).
2.4. Thanks for the suggestions, but this
a drop in the sea. With systematic work
One-time payments andsubsidies are NOT SIGNIFICANT,
- they can be neglected. Regular
Petersburg and expenses. Better make up the form
on 1/2 A4. (both sides + text). Plo-
leaf space can be used more efficiently
effective:
2.4.1 Date of completion - in one line with
"A questionnaire."
2.4.2. The word "questionnaire" (font size) on
three or four sizes smaller.
2.4.3. Multiple points (type 13) in
two columns are questionable. Having made 2.4.1 -
2.4.3, you can cram it in small print and
text.
Note: the original layouts are accepted by you
send in 2 copies. (just in case).
About the content of the last "Paragraph".
Article by V. Volodin "ZX-Sp in the 21st century".
Well, why are you printing this nonsense? I already
I wrote to you several times - no need to download
shit from the sewer. And you yourself need to
rinse your brains as little as possible in this
shit. Understand, this man is delusional. For-
It's clear that he moved a long time ago
on PC (emulator) and it’s time to transfer it
living on heroin - the glitches are worse there.
A person gets pleasure from MENTALLY
GO FORFICTION, T-i.e. damn root. Word
[Spectrum] is already meaningless for him (see.
epigraph RL No. 9 (Kolmogorov’s students), -
it's something like a conditioned reflex - like
in a dog in Pavlov's experiments, - on irritation -
tel, - a light bulb or a bell. Try it
ask him - what is his meaning?
in this word? The line between the
between a chimera (mirage) andreality. Even
if he sells his last pants, os-
Tanks in a state of “no stake, no yard.” -
and even sell his organs for spare parts,
- this chimera will not be realized. This is impossible. The situation could have been saved
selling the brain - but it is defective...
This is exactly what debilitation is. A
by publishing this nonsense, you are dirtying your brains
to your readers. I already wrote to you - TAKE IT
MONEY from online idiots for publishing In-
Internet addresses - at least some kind of yushka with
these goats. In everything else from them
benefits like goat's milk. And money is needed
we can take it for the fact that it is YELLOW, -
accordingly, loss of reputation - although,
readers, AT FIRST, maybe there will be
more. But very quickly readers, inspired
having seen the example of such intoxicating nonsense
Yes, they themselves will turn into goats. This is for you
before? the harm of delirium is the delusion of harm. (Think-
those at their leisure, how these words are connected by
meaning). According to the article "Forget the word "la-
mer"": if you forget this word, then there will be
darkness. And one day you'll have to remember the word
goat The user becomes a lamer
when he starts to talk about things like this
topics such as "ZX-SP in the 21st century".
Understand, this YELLOWness is what kills Spectrum.
Problems are not solved by hiding
fishing in the sand - like ostriches. Sign
goat - network address (almost always).
P.S. If you really want to help,
I cansuggest the following: Layout + typing
+ printing of original advertising layouts for
mailings. will have to do from now on
until now", - i.e. without "creativity". Except
Moreover, I cannot explain what is being done and why
I will - it’s long and tedious (laziness). Mother-
you can place them in “Paragraph” (but -
or in FULL form, - without cuts and editing -
ry - or don’t print at all). Style
design - see advertising. plastic bag.
(c) Nemo
Share your thoughts about the article