412302 01/19/02.
Hello, dear Vyacheslav Geor-
Gievich.
If you allow, chipboard:
This is not nostalgia for secrecy, but
a way to untie your hands: because there is
agreement to publish correspondence on
It's up to you to decide -
publish or not - you will do it yourself.
Your letter was received on January 18, 2002.
We offer two for your consideration
version of Parshev's shell book: corrected
sealed, with minimal changes, and "re-
shaken", which in theory should be
run on any 128 kB (or more) machines
(volume limitation from below - due to con-
ratyevsky razipovschik working
only in 128 mode). Made like
"iS-Review", which probably
mu and “went great on KAY”, which is
initially designed as MACHINE-INDEPENDENT
MY. This is roughly what I meant when I talked about
"shake-up". Was tested on
"ATM-turbo", "ZS-Scorpion", "GrandTower
2+" in 128 mode.
If one of these options suits you
as a subdirectory item for electronic
books, do not forget to make them in
catalog marked "128 kB".
This will apply to any other
iS-shells, where skinning is used
Evsky unpacker.
In addition, I would like to inform you that the collections
ki "ZX-Review" in iS-DOS format is also pre-
underwent significant changes over several
ky positions:
1)Several noted errors have been corrected
side effects and flaws in texts;
2) roughness during operation has been corrected
with flowers;
3) the shells are “transplanted” onto the iS-DOS kernel
'99, with a new catalog format (up to
this was with the core of the 96th year);
4) and finally, most importantly - fixed
global glitch for all shells: after
several (8..12) “dives” point by point
menu, the system sooner or later crashed
coils" - hung or reset. Preferred
positive, this was due to overload
the completeness of the return stack of bat files. In ob-
This has been eliminated in new versions of "ZX-Review".
When testing after three dozen "nowadays"
zealous" the system continues to work reliably
it's good.
As soon as I release the necessary amount
quality of floppy disks, I will send you updated ones
versions.
I also need to know your opinion
Here's the question:
I consider the current situation abnormal
tion, in which information support
and maintenance of the iS-DOS system is carried out by
only one person - one of her
authors. I would like to try organizing
support the system “from below” - from the side
us users. For this purpose it is planned
compilation of a collection of materials about work in
iS-DOS (like "iS-Review"). Details
project - in the printout of the file "and_else.inf".
Frankly speaking, I don't think that
The project is doomed to success. But if still
will be able to prepare a full-fledged collection,
is it realwill be distributed through
Your e-book subdirectory, along with
"iS-Review"? For this I will provide a test
copies of the collection (and if required,
xia - printout of the screensaver).
just as in the case of "iS-Review", de-
no tender reward will be required. If
there will be some profit from this business, then
it would be wiser to use it there at your place
on the spot, without leaving the cash register.
If you find this option widespread
possible injury, please place
advertising file "and_more.inf" in the directory :REK-
LAMA of the next edition of "Open Letters".
If not, then I ask you to put it in "Open"
letters" another version of the file -
"and_more_.inf", where there is no mention of your
participation.
Moreover, this text assumes
can serve as a kind of rec-
lama of the "iS-Review" collections.
Both editions of the advertising file and this
letter - in the root directory of the shell Par-
sheva.
N.N.N....., 19.1.02.
Sinclairists of all countries,
unite!
IF...
If you liked the ZX-Review issue in
iS-DOS format...
If you did not like the release of ZX-Review in
iS-DOS format...
If you have at least something to say (and
a real man always has something to say
ask) about this...
If you are not indifferent to the idea of submitting
a variety of interesting and useful information
mation in iS-DOS format, nothesitate
share your concern with the composition
the body of this collection at:
[...censored...]
Any possible
nary materials (text and not so much) on
iS-DOS themes that can serve as a basis
for a new, author's collection dedicated to
significant exchange of experience between users
iS-DOS systems.
WHAT DO YOU NEED?
Practice shows that iS-DOS, having
behind its ten-year history
development and improvement, being a system
a topic that is documented in great detail,
still causes great difficulties in mastering
research among users, especially beginners -
there is a very big difference in concept and idea
ology of this system compared to, say,
with TR-DOS, - with this high-speed emulator
tape recorder.
And even experienced sinclairists often
have mastered programming very well
within the framework of TR-DOS, it happens that they become at a dead end
in front of the rather complex architecture of the new
operating system, before more stringent
restrictions on memory use.
The matter is complicated by the fact that many
iS-DOS callers are forced to "stew in
own juice", alone groping
the right path through trial and error.
And finally, it cannot be considered normal
the current situation in which the resistance
driving and information support system
we actually run iS-DOSonly by force
one person - one of its authors.
At the same time, every user, believing
in iS-DOS, there is always an op-
limited experience, small and big wins
over ignorance, unfamiliarity and meeting
potential shortcomings in iS-DOS
utilities.
Now you have a choice: continue and
continue to languish like Kashchei, circling over the gold
pits your knowledge of the iS-DOS system, or
bring them into the common treasury of the mind, share
share your experience with others and, accordingly,
specifically, learn about their successes, findings and
decisions.
It is quite possible that, having come out of the "under-
fields", you can find on the pages of
whom a collection of colleagues with similar interests within
iS-DOS systems, establish mutually beneficial
correspondence or other personal contacts.
I would like to reassure users
iS-DOS, complex about the very possibility
opportunities to contribute to the overall
case: “Oh me, poor, unfortunate! And
I don’t know anything, and I can’t do anything!”
Relax. Don't forget the Snake principle
Gorynych: one head is good, but three is
better! Having piled on the whole crowd, you can
launch a satellite into orbit. According to rumors
That's what the Chinese do.
WHAT WILL IT BE?
All incoming information is assumed
can be sorted by different thematic
rubrics Number and composition of headings, their
the name has not been definitively established,
can be a subjectdiscussions and will be for-
depend on the activity of iS-DOS users.
Every opinion can matter. Write-
those, gentlemen, there is no water under a lying stone
flows.
Topics can be very different. For example
measures, - your experience in iS-DOS, your
additions to proprietary help, workarounds
software defects, methods for improving
efficiency and ease of working with the system
mine. Will be welcomed with great interest
messages from programmers working in
iS-DOS.
May also be raised for discussion
users any problematic issues
dew. Strictly speaking, this section apparently
will make sense only if the collection can
may become quite periodic, at least
once every six months.
The application will contain programs
we, their texts in Assembly (yes, at least in
iS-DOS BASIC!), screens - everything that is not
falls under the category of texts.
It is planned to publish all letters
except those whose publication is prohibited
explicitly and directly by their authors. Address
will be included in the text only if desired
author. Letters may be accompanied by
the compiler's mentary, if it is
deemed appropriate or if such
the desire will be expressly stated in the letter.
Generally speaking, wishes to those sent
letters are close to those established by the company (c)
Nemo for the information collection "Discovery"
letters" - they have passed the test of time -
him and proved theirviability and price
forest-likeness (see the file "about.txt" for
catalog :NEMO of any issue of "Open Pi-
seven").
WHAT WILL IT BE?
In “serious” publications they write: “Material
Submissions for publications are accepted as manuscripts.
nom, printed and electronic versions."
Same parsley here. I’ll add on my own behalf that
electronic version (ideal case - in
accompanied by a paper copy) preferred
more so for two reasons.
Firstly, it simplifies the processing of post-
information, saves time, searches
There are discrepancies, etc., etc.
Secondly and most importantly. It’s unlikely to be
the driver will immediately be hit with a flow of materials,
sufficient to complete the collection in
in full. On the other hand, the user
people who believed that they were real
can definitely do something, they have the right to
read that the exchange of information is not
will last for years. In this case
the floppy disk sent should help,
which will return to the owner, supplemented
information already collected by this time -
neither. It is possible that this exchange option
will become the main, and maybe even the only
nom.
For other users - those who have chosen
paper communication technology - you will have to
be patient until the quantity and quality
the quality of information will not allow compiling
complete collection. If this goal is
children has been achieved, it is expected that
distribution of the collectionthrough company channels (c)
Nemo via e-book subdirectory
(Clause 3.5 of catalog (c) Nemo).
However, “paper” exchange is also not artificial.
lyuchen, - in the form of answers to letters. In this
in case the case will be helped by the inscribed marking
bath envelope with return address.
"Electronic" means "at 5.25''
DS/DD floppy disk in iS-DOS format". If under
I don’t have a free DD five-inch camera in my hand, you can
and 3.5'' DD. If it gets shoved on
TR-DOS disk, or on MS-DOS 720 KB, then
but, in general, it’s not a problem. If there is tension with
disks, suitable for extreme cases and commu-
compact cassettes (yes, even CDs or
videotapes). Preferred encoding
- iS-Editor. Valid options are ASCII
(DOS IBM), ANSI (Windows IBM), KOI-8,
KOI-7/N1 (NR), KOI-7/N2 (NS), TLW2+,
TLW2m... In MicroEditor or ZX-WinWord
In principle, it’s also possible. But in UniCode and
HTML - please do not get rid of it. Another thing is
that all these encoding-format delights
may cause legitimate confusion: is there
there is no point in talking about iS-DOS
in iS-DOS?
WHAT NEXT?
The answer is simple - “God knows.” Case
This is new, untested by anyone. Quite
it is possible that the swamp of indifference and disbelief,
having stirred up a couple of times, it will rest beneath itself
and this project. But!!! Gentlemen! At some point
you and I have a real chance to help
each other, help the people survive (our
I'm with you)home computer going
through life side by side, next to us now
for many years. To paraphrase a famous TV story -
lama, you can say: “Zet X is the na-
shemu! Is it really Russian (Belarusian,
Ukrainian, Georgian, etc.) person os-
becomes tantamount only because of this matter
no immediate and large benefits are foreseen
yeah? Nobody of sound mind and good memory
doesn’t throw away his childhood photos in a landfill
photographs only because they have turned yellow.
But only if he throws it away, it’s better not
looks into the eyes of childhood friends - maybe
after all, punch him in the face...
* * *
412302 06.02.02
Dear N..... N.N.!
1) Your letter was received on 02/04/02, your
translation 02/05/02.
2). Thanks for the work. No complaints -
excellent. You wrote in a previous letter,
that you have problems with membranes. I am sending
- on occasion, - a couple of pieces. As an editor
to the department, I must provide copyright
remuneration to both the intended authors,
and to those who took part in the preparation
preparation of materials for printing. Unfortunately,
I can only offer barter, - i.e. op-
lat from the catalog (price list) according to available-
There is a list and prices in it. Practically
all rental mechanisms have been destroyed by cattle
from networks. (Oranus (lat.) - translated into
Russian asshole, - this is the network) -
Goatpotamia, in short. What is Oranus see.
Pelevin"Generation "P"". They use
mouth like a feces spewer. I understand that
lines like this are invigorating. (On the influence of networks on
See below for your mentality). Editorial
"R.L." notified of dispatch
Letters to you from Drozdovsky - of course, these are
can be considered an empty formality - but
"... confidentiality is at your discretion-
"... is my commitment. Next, pay
that editorial for publications $3-$5 / per page.
Think about the possibility of your publications,
- payment:
$5 r r
─── * 30.7 ─ / 5.9 ──── = 26 USD/page
pp $ cu
(see price list.) Sent membranes can be
those are considered as an advance payment:
30 USD (clause 1.12.2)*2/26 USD/page=2.3 pages.
I warn you in advance that the text is possible.
it is possible, you will have to modify it 2-3 times,
Illustrations are welcome. It would be nice
receive from you a detailed list of topics on
which you could and would like to publish -
Xia. Apparently, you are interested in "about-
locks", - see below for more information on this. Special Interest
would be an article about the organization of a club
ba (mug, sections, etc.), how to get it
elk you have, - with pros and cons, "sub-
water stones", (the devil is in the chalk)
languish"), constituent documents (continued
some of them, links, fragments of statutes,
etc.), - work experience and results, -
the way you understand them. Your PRACTICE is important -
TICAL EXPERIENCE.
3) I send, - again on occasion, -
bookN. Wiener (I have two of them, - comes -
to stock up - because "pioneers" read them -
they work REGULARLY, - another item on the invoices
expenses...). Take a look if you're interested -
no, - a shell is possible. Most interesting-
New, in my opinion, places are crossed out.
(The whole book is unlikely to fit on a disk, - po-
that will have to be cut back. If you juice
expand, it is advisable to leave the marked out places
twist
And one more thing. If you decide to do it according to N.Vina-
ru shell, then BE SURE to find the book
"Cybernetics". There's an interview at the end
from 1968, - IT IS VERY IMPORTANT, and should
enter the shell.
4) I am sending the text of the questionnaire. Please size up
knife and let USERS fill it out
REAL MACHINES, - networkers and emulators
I'M NOT INTERESTED. Questionnaires can be anonymous
small - but there must be a hand to use
la (facsimile) - otherwise it is difficult to judge
reliability. Questionnaires are distributed and
through other channels, DISTRIBUTION of the questionnaire
in networks, - as well as translating the questionnaire into electronic
The frontal view is PROHIBITED, because necessary
reliable information, not "products"
mass unconscious from networks (kal).
The same applies to the letter to Drozdovsky.
Send when ready (3 months).
5) Now the answers to your current letter-
mo.
5.1. I think that Sp128 architecture is
90% of the market, so you can (and should) do it
in this version. The problem is different - version
Kondratiev is not supported by anyone. There
yesflaws in the conceptual plan - and
namely, free handling of standards
ISDOS, - more details to Leontiev. (iS Soft),
- its solutions at internal levels (core)
MANDATORY. OS is a stan-
darts, - if you blur them, you will get holes -
ku from the bagel.
5.2. The shell project itself is now frozen
wives, - IT IS NECESSARY to invest money, - se-
The teviks (goats) are just waiting for this, - I
I’ll put it in, and they’ll put it out... It’s already happened, -
swam, we know. The problem with shells is
rental mechanism - everything else is secondary
slowly, otherwise you will get nets (Goatpot-
miyu) take two. Those. compliance problem
copyright law. By the way, if I scrape up de-
Negative for the next "Open letters" clause about
distribution on networks WILL BE REMOVED. Goats
- goat swill, - let them learn to pay
money. All of the above applies to
subdirectory - while the thieves are in force - it’s difficult
do something.
5.3. "...system support from below" is possible
POSSIBLE ONLY THROUGH CASH DEPUTATIONS
(rent) OS USERS is a PROFESSIONAL
A CAL product - there is NO other way. this is long
long and long topic. Users can
something to do - but only AFTER payment
product, including “support”.
The point is that management is necessary.
Product support is not SMOOTH
OPTIMIZATION, - which means it is necessary as a mi-
at least one level of management. Not all re-
The solutions will appeal to users. INin particular
ty, solutions aimed at the future
five to ten years will be met with hostility
(goats in the networks earn points on this).
Average user stay in
The Sp-platform is 3-4 years old, it is clear that
they won't want to pay for it. Follow-up
the suitability of opportunistic decisions
child to death OS. Next, it is necessary to coordinate
nation of action and must "keep"
standards - and this is again professionalism,
money and management.
5.4. "... I don't think the project will succeed
Chen for success. The problem, as already said, is
rent mechanism. Shells are work
(task) FOR MORE THAN ONE PERSON, -
and this again, a company, money, professional
ism. But you have a resource - your users
vateli, "kruzhkov" members. Let me work a little
are melting - at least they will understand what it is and why
this is different from online slutting.
(bleating, - root _bl_ -) Tragedy in the pe-
revode from Greek - rehash of KOZLOV.
To make a subdirectory YOU NEED MONEY, -
invested in the Sp-platform MORE THAN ENOUGH
BUT, - but NOTHING IS POSTED, - goats-
They lay out the smelly ones. What to print on
catalogue? I won't invest another penny,
Why do these assholes steal under the guise of fucking
rehash, - EXCUSES, - signature
"product" of networks... The same goes for
collection "Revelation" letters," is repeated
thorium with "ZX-F"... Goats learned to steal
and "Rev. letters," - NO rent.6. Comments on the article.
6.1. If there is an issue of "Open Letters" -
I will post it LITERALLY. For publication in
"R.L." rather weak. You appeal to the network
crowd; - and they are only consumers. Although,
Despite all of the above, the idea is good
shaya (but all of the above remains, however
less, in force.). Give it a try. Any way I can
I will support. Another thing is that ALL MY ACTIONS
TVYA COSTS MONEY. But they are precisely used
disconcertingly few. Goats in nets, fucking over-
singing, they convinced each other that my prices
DEAR, - for them this is already an axiom. Feces
I caulked their brains tightly. They prose-
beat themselves... This is done
(chatter about the high cost is a type
whoreness) in order to STEAL. Because
if it's expensive, then:
1) the product does not meet the quality,
and:
1a) costs nothing, THEREFORE,
CONSUMPTION IS NOT THEFT;
1b) I am engaged in covetousness, -poe-
to that ROBBERY OF ME, - valor and youth-
childhood (example - KANO)
This schmuck has never done anything, -
except for the fucking, useless de-
mok, - they judge the products...
An interesting question is why in networks
there is no howling about the high cost of bread, for example? From-
vet: whore, don't whore, - what if you steal
loaf, - Caesar will put you in jail. They
they know this - therefore THE PRICE OF BREAD IS FAIR -
VA. The bitches are sweaty. And me, and anyone
manufacturer, - you can steal, -
That's why they steal, moron.6.2. "... causes great difficulties in
development," you have to pay money. If
the crowd thinks that I (or Leontyev) in-
It’s interesting to clean out that feces from their brains, which
with whom they caulk each other's brains,
- then they are wrong - THIS IS WORTH MONEY.
THE PROBLEM IS EXACTLY THIS. On the other hand
we, if you decide to do it for free, -
then you will corrupt them even more with freebies
(note, the root _vr_ -, - in-
egalitarianism and debauchery are the same root words,
- vowel (fluent in Russian: -o-,
-e-, ran away from shame. Oh, schmuck-
ri!!!), - and you won’t last long... But
you still have to try, otherwise NOTHING
YOU WILL NOT UNDERSTAND - and you will take my words for rhetoric -
riku...
6.3. "Stew in your own juice" - and
Have you tried paying money?! The question is not for
To you, and to the users "stewed in the
tyah.
6.4. "... share your experience."
Experience occurs only with PROFESSIONAL
work, - in other cases, - CHIMERAS. That is
when working aimed at creating POT-
CHILD COST. Who doesn't understand this?
swears, - they look like they’re stoned (about the classroom)
viatura, - head, - goats). There is a danger
There is a possibility that this will be a piggy bank of chimeras. However
less need to try... In the end,
if a person is sincere and acts, he is early
or later - even in a false system he will find
the path to truth. (this is from Zen Buddhism). A
one who is insincere, even in the true system
topicwill acquire a lie (from there, - for exact-
I can’t vouch for the exactness of the quote). Experience arises in
process of PRODUCT DEMAND - and not
when swiping the keyboard.
6.5. "Pressed by the whole crowd." You don't-
when you haven't seen a hundred people carry
one brick? This is what will happen. crowd,
she is the crowd - until she learns to swim
it will remain a crowd. sweat together
Yes, - and... the mountain gave birth to a mouse... You can’t
treat the crowd - this makes them even more furious and
enhances. But it is necessary to act -
there must be a way out...
6.6. "...subject of discussion..."
Where?!! By whom?!! Experience, and accordingly
Only
to professionals. But they are not there!!! Semi-
The next goat talk begins. Networks,
They will undoubtedly be very happy about this. How are you
identify noteworthy sources
information from idiots?
6.7. “Write, gentlemen, write” - once
Be careful, the fact of sending a letter is an example-
but, 50 rubles, and that’s like min!
6.8. "Techniques for increasing efficiency" -
favorite topic of machine addicts. Effective
ness of what?!! Code? - it is absurd if
considered outside the integrity of the product.
This is an end in itself for an idiot. This is technical again
characteristics. In general, the set of rubrics is
but inspired by networks: "Forum - for discussion
...", etc.
6.9. "...periodic..." - THIS IS PRO-
FESSIONAL TASK, worth the money - otherwise
IT DOES NOT HAPPEN - understand this! The overhead is based onexpenses and the acquisition of experience lies
REGULARITY and, therefore, NORMAL in ma-
thematic sense, i.e. without expenses
(carrying out professional activities
ity) IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET EXPERIENCE! Who will
pay? Networkers, these goats? But what about
"free access to information" is the same
their foundation, their version of “take away and everything’s over”
to divide," is a stinking thief.
6.10. "They have stood the test of time."
My wallet has passed the test of time, and
unsuccessful so far... This is a subsidized project, -
the goats never learned to pay, and
they didn’t really want to learn it. In re-
As a result, they rapidly PROGRESS into goat
fishing Let's see what happens next... Well
concerns expediency, then you guessed
whether. But I won’t expand on this topic -
Xia.
6.11. "The ideal case is accompanied by-
research paper copy" - all accurate to
on the contrary. The usual order is paper co-
piya, - and el. view at the discretion of the correspondent
denta. Otherwise you will not be able to organize NOR-
SMALL, REGULAR work. Next come Va-
shi CHIMERAS, - try it out, - convince -
hang on. The plot is clearly inspired by networks (available in
I mean the point "First of all").
6.12.1. "... will become the main one, or maybe
even the only one,” it won’t be. Fact
sending letters during REGULAR WORK - 50
r. This amount was not taken out of thin air - EXPERIENCE.
In addition, it is confirmed independently
we are a fact. In the club's radio consultation
Krenkelit cost from 50 k. to 1 r. On-
I remember that until the end of the 80s a dollar cost 63
kop., i.e. in terms of dollars: $0.8-1.58,
i.e. in today's rubles:
1.02^N*(0.8-1.58)$*30.7 r/$, where 1.02^N -
inflation adjustment (the dollar has a NORMAL
inflation 2% per year - “losing weight”) We have: N=12
(min) years => 1.25*30.7*(0.8-1.58) =
30.7-60.6 rub. Moreover, then the envelope with
stamp cost 5 kopecks, i.e. $0.08-1.25 (inf.
coefficient $0.1, now there's an envelope in the mail with
brand min - 2 rub. 85 kopecks (up to 20 grams),
either; in $: 2.85/30.7=$0.092, i.e. everything is similar
is going on. Please note that the Krenkel club sent out
ONLY PAPER (up to 20 grams - you will have
floppy disks, - more envelope, more stamps,
the price of the floppy disk itself, the price of office supplies
supplies (paper) etc.)). If this is
shine, it will be great! Essentially
this is a “weight function” - i.e. idiots from
networks will not bother you just like that.
(they have everything for free, - freeloaders, - THIS
THEIR PRINCIPLE IS COMMON.
6.12.2. "Signed envelope" - own
actually the envelope itself with stamps is just
10-5% of the cost of sending. If you
are you going to try this thing on the networks?
- then I’m not your help here, - why bad-
to give birth to whores (Soros' whore incubators",
- from the word "incubus" - male homunculus -
yes, a golem) and corrupt them. Understand - you
you will produce idiots, - freebies, - and
at the same time drown the street - and, at the same time, rivet
personnelidiots for the IBM PC platform. Desire-
It is advisable to isolate yourself from networks altogether.
6.13. "... compact cassettes, com-
CDs (?!), video cassettes" - well, that's
already obvious chimeras, - you have never occupied
were a REAL thing - at least in
this area.
6.14. "...is not expected to be immediate and
big gain",... This is the most terrible
there is a glitch in the entire article. This, again, has
attitude towards networks - this is their goat dog -
Nya. the problem is that the money is now
stopped performing their main function -
MEASURE OF THE USEFULNESS OF PEOPLE. Therefore, everyone is loaded
They paint with the same brush. KANO - this one will come
rock, - "human rights activist", counts earnings -
losing money is almost a crime. Re-
result - justification for theft, destruction
professionalization (by stealing with networks)
onals, promotion of freebies, destruction
(networks) of independent information sources
(again by stealing), non-compliance
copyright, allowing manipulation
convey information by slipping
freebies. So the goats proclaiming "free
access to information" just information
and deprive themselves.
7. Regarding the IDE controller. I advise
calculate in "Open letters" ALL links by
this issue. The most important thing is the screw "Con-
ner", - only this brand. Next - BP. By-
where are you going to connect it? U
You’re not there KAY... If you get a connection -
lyuchit, - let's article. I have regularlyinterested: how to connect to Scorp, to
this, that, etc. Try to prepare
publication - in case of successful connection
- what and how. I’ll tell you right away what will happen
link like: "attempt to expand can-
sew you computer." That's how it usually happens,
because ALL Sp-cars, except for KAY, are not
assigned (not designed) for expansion.
(c) Nemo
P.S. If I write a long answer, this is
means that he WILL DEFINITELY BE in “Rev.
letters." Otherwise I just won't lose
time. I am not able to explain everything to everyone.
thread There are many users, but I am alone.
P.P.S. 1) "User Guide" -
to connect the screw - maybe it will help...
2) Why don’t you send
article in "Abz@ts" - he is working now
more quickly than "Open letters".
3) I’ll send you the floppy disks later - now
hour out of stock.
4) Offered to you for review -
letter to Drozdovsky is an attempt
corporate governance. It's clear that I
from St. Petersburg is not able to command i-
archrically (as the lamers in the ser-
tah), but such a task is not set. This
would be bad management. Much easier
would be to establish some common goals -
then the efforts will add up. Besides that-
go, my actions will become “transparent” for you
new" and predictable. Possible mutual
action and coordination - while you
turn out to behands are freed as much as possible and
You can take into account the peculiarities of the local
you) situations. I repeat once again - translation
in electronic form is prohibited.
412302 02/21/2002.
Dear N..... N.N.!
The editors of "Radio Amateur" do not object
against distribution on the Internet
tion article.
For my part, I would like to note that
Only the editorial can be damaged.
If you don't mind, please correct the errors.
typesetter (network forwarder?), checking
publication text with manuscript.
Thanks in advance. (c) Nemo
Share your thoughts about the article