Moonwalk of Americans - I somehow began to notice that the public was making noise about the fact of the flight of US astronauts to the Moon.

                  
     ############# AMERICANS' BEST WALK #############    
                    
                                                                
  (C) Sirv!vor                                                  
                                                                
                                "History as we know it is a lie"
                                                                
                                                                
    The material below is nothing more than an attempt
retell what I read and saw in some publications and
television programs. The very idea of developing, creating and 
the publication of such an article is dictated by personal desire
record information of unusual type and content, as well as
give some of your thoughts on the facts below.
What is written below is indeed my own research
based on actual data or your own guesses.        
                                                                
    After a littleintroduction I must admit that the speech is below
will talk about a rather hackneyed fact or even an event in the world
history. In fact, I don’t think Spectrum fans are like that
could be occupied by such popular science reading, but still,
I think the material will give you aesthetic pleasure and move you
you to new thoughts on topics abstracted from the Spectrum.            
                                                                
    I myself sometimes find myself thinking about various things.
classified material topics, but lately I've come to
conclusion that all these various top-secret series are about covered
darkness of materials, although they may be based on some
semi-real mystical events, for the most part are
an invention of the same writers and directors on the given topic
or full of water falsification, which zealously desire
mislead the world by having at your disposal
a couple of million dollars.                                 
                                                                
    Most of all in this matter I trust such programs and
magazines such as: "Obvious Incredible", "Civilization", "Miracles and
adventures", "Knowledge is a question mark". These are, in my opinion, the most
authoritative and popularizedsources of information on
"unknown" topics.                                             
                                                                
    In recent years, I have somehow begun to notice that the public
creates a buzz around the fact that US astronauts flew to the Moon in 1969
year.  More or less, the servants of the pen are again to blame for this -
one said, the other retold.   In the end it turns out
the impression that this is actually what they say. But is it worth it?
believe idle speculation.  So let’s ask ourselves the question: is it really
in fact, American pilots, dressed in spacesuits, visited
lunar surface.                                             
                                                                
                              * * *                           
                                                                
    Since the late 50s, the two superpowers have been in the midst of a race
for the right to deliver and land astronauts on the surface of our
Earth's natural satellite - the Moon, but it was still necessary to bring out
man into space.  Let me remind you of the chronology of events, touching only
events around the Moon.                                            
                                                                
- 1957 year. The first artificial Earth satellite (USСP) was launched.  
                                                                
- 1959 year. An artificial body was delivered to the Moon. Luna 2 (SSCP).
                                                                
- 1959 year. Photos of the invisible side of the Moon. Luna 3 (USСP).  
                                                                
- 1966 year. Soft landing on the Moon, panoramic images of the surface 
ty Moon. Moon 9. ()SSСP).                                       
                                                                
- 1968 Manned flight around the Moon. Apollo 8 (USA).         
                                                                
- 1969 Three astronauts on the surface of the Moon (Eagle module). Apollo
11 (USA).                                                       
Let's analyze this data. We immediately see the picture
mythical mistake, fate. What's the matter? According to the logic of events, it is
Soviet cosmonauts were supposed to be the first earthlings,
entered the surface of our planet's satellite. Isn't it true?
that the Soviet Union spent much more on lunar exploration
financial and material resources in the period from1959 to 1969year.
At the same time, it should be noted that Soviet and American data
about flights and flybys of the Moon were, naturally, classified and
they could not simply be transferred to each other across the ocean. Soviet Union
strived at all costs to be the first to land a person on
solid surface at a distance of several hundred thousand
kilometers from the cradle of humanity, but he failed. O
possible reasons below.                                        
                                                                
    I took this data from the Soviet edition reference book. Later I
I found an American directory, or rather, data from an American
reference book interpreting the US successes in achieving the lunar goal. B
it added the following:                                        
                                                                
- 1958 year. Explorer is started. (USA)                             
                                                                
- 1961 year. Astronaut Alan Shepard - first American in space 
(USA).                                                          
                                                                
- 1962 year. John Glenn was the first American to orbit the Earth three times.
                                                                
- 1964 year. CCSP carries out the flight of 3 astronauts. American 
The Ranger-7 probe reaches the Moon.                                   
                                                                
    Comparing two statistical references, it leads to
conclusion: each power praises itself.  And this is not excluded. But
were Americans on the moon?                                     
                                                                
    Having become seriously interested in this problem, I dug up a book,
telling about landing on the moon for “their” Americanlovers and those interested in history, again for the Yankees. About this
I'll tell you more about the book, but here's what I found. Based on this
I will do an analysis of the descriptions and photographs given in it.     
                                                                
    This is how the American moon landing is described
astronauts: "Approaching the Moon on July 20, 1969, the American
astronates Neil Armstrong and Edwin (Buzz) Aldrin realized: they were on
on the verge of disaster... Armstrong switched to manual control and
slowed down the speed of the module.  It dropped from 210 meters to 90 m,
then up to 60...".                                                
                                                                
    They showed footage of their landing on television and that’s what we
we see there in more detail: the ship upon landing  is brutally dusty  and
sweeps over the lunar boulders, it sways and twitches.
Next, it is shown that the astronaut is already leaving the module and his
filmed from the side.   But look carefully
taking a closer look... Rightunder the lander is clearly
visible trace of the astronaut.                                        
                                                                
    Does this mean anything to you?                                
                                                                
    If you still don’t understand what’s going on, I’ll explain now. When
the module landed on the surface of the Moon,from its nozzlelocated
vertically to the surface of the Moon,tongues of combustible gas burst out
suddenly, dust was rising - this was clearly visible in the film footage.
These languages, in fact, according to the logic of things, should have formed when
landing under the module a small crater or, as a last resort,
disperse all this dust from under it into fossils. But where from?
there will be dust under the module if the shuttle sat down and accelerated
all the dust? There isn't even a recess underneath it!                 
                                                                
 These facts are the first doubt.                       
                                                                
    At the same time, the astronaut climbs down the ladder quite confidently.
Next, what immediately catches my eye is the horizon line
the Moon is quite close to the observer.Thisgenerally strange
looks like when the module sat down, everything was full
boulders, small craters, and now there is nothing like that. B
the book contains a photograph quite well known to the world community,
showing Aldrin standing on the surface of the Moon.  Behind him
the lunar surface extends. It would seem nothing unusual
but still... When the same Aldrin climbed out of Eagle's Sun
it shone so brightly that quite a large surface was illuminated
up to the imaginary horizon.  Now, looking at this
photograph, I have the impression thatto the left of it
there is some kind of spotlight illuminating the surface, since
the light is bright within approximately a ten-meter radius of the astronaut, and
further, the light is scattered so strongly that the surface is further
ten to twenty meters from this astronaut acquired some kind of
gray color. Everyone knows that the surface of the Moon is yellow or
the predominant color is yellow - not gray or even dark blue.
This same photo contains another feature common to all
"lunar" photographs - in its background  there are no
signs of the presence of celestial bodies - stars!!!  Isn't it true?
strange, given that the Moon has absolutely no atmosphere.Having no atmosphere, what is more strange is that when
the incidence of direct sunlight on the surface of the Moon,its
the surface is heated to a temperature of 120 degrees Celsius.
In this heat, there is no clear trace on the lunar sand, astronaut
cannot leave at all - a trace of such clarity can be obtained
only on damp sand.  Even on ordinary sand heated to 60
degrees, no clear trace of the boots can remain!   
                                                                
    We can also say the following, considering only this
photograph and another one printed below. People are falling on the astronaut
direct sunlight, if they are rays at all, and not
light from fluorescent lamps. So, with the development of science
30 years ago it was impossible to provide even an astronaut with 100%
protection from solar radiation in space. I'm not talking about output in
open space these days and not even about the first exit of N. Leonov,
which lasted only a few minutes.  I'm talking about what
astronauts on the Moon would certainly have to
be irradiated under such a powerful stream of particles from the Sun and no longer
survive to this day due to cancerdiseases associated
with this fact, but they are alive and well to this day. But still
The more paradoxical fact is that such suits as those worn by astronauts are not
provide protection from radiation in the doses that they could
get into them, and their walk on the moon might already be over
at 3 minutes or 30 meters from the module, if you like.             
                                                                
    Having mentioned some “bottom” photograph, I want to describe it.
It depicts three astronauts in their flight suits.
spacesuits in which they roamed the Moon on their
landing.  The suits themselves must be full of radionuclides.
Although, perhaps, these are not the same spacesuits, since it is known that
Americans splashed down in the Pacific Ocean and it would be natural
change space clothes.                                    
                                                                
    Let's continue the revelation. Speaking of meters... As far as I remember,
they began to expose astronauts a long time ago, namely from the fact that
on the moon when installedthe flag sways!How can this happen
It's not clear to me.  The film footage of this moment shows one of
astronauts who hastily tries to plant the flag
and seems to smooth out the clothflag.  At the same time, he always
stands like thisas if he is trying to obscure the movie camera. I'm not here, except
flag, it is not entirely clear why, given his blind love for the flag,
Can't an American place the camera from a slightly different angle?  
                                                                
    Let's measure the flag in this picture and give its dimensions
in a ratio of 1:2, where 1 is the length of the panel, and 2 is the length
shaft.  In another photo, but for some reason it’s also black and white
there is a flag.  Perhaps this is the same one - I won’t say.
Now the camera is positioned so that the landing struts are visible
module and at some distance from them there is a straightened flag (again
there is a mass of unsprayed lunar sand around). This despite the fact that
in the previous passage the flag did not want to straighten out at all, but everything
time developed as if it were supported by a huge fan
a stream of air. What is especially interesting about this second photo is that
that the dimensions of the flag do not correspond to the dimensions given above. Ha
the photograph shows the shaft, the panel, but this time it is created
the impression is that the panel is somewhat longer, and the shaft
lost in the greasy and very black shadow - but from what?
In this shadow you can't even see the moonlightsurface and the rest of the shaft,
if it even exists there. I'm saying this because I have
I got the impression that this photo is
combined, also black and white, where the flag seems to be embedded,
inserted into the frame.                                                
                                                                
    Famous astronaut jumps on the Moon -pure water
falsification, you can rest assured, as with everything else.
The fact is that the whole world saw the movements of astronauts on the Moon
in a somewhat slower manner, and in some places even faster. That is I
I want to say that a skillful director wanted to show acceleration and
slowing down the emulation (how fashionable this word is now) of the lunar
gravity.  It is also known from the school physics course that Force
The gravity on the Moon is 6 times less than that on Earth. And what? Uncle, be
a person even in a spacesuit  with a total weight of up to 150 kg. he is on
surface of the Moon should jump like a grasshopper, jumping to a height
up to 3  meters, with a lunar weight of about 30-40 kg. And what do we see on
film?   There's an astronaut, obviously in slow motion.
jumps as if on an ordinary earth's surface, and his jumps are not
reach even75 cm, not to mention some 3 meters. Additionally
However, if you view these frames in accelerated mode, then clearly
it is clear that this is the jumping of an ordinary person on some kind of heap
sand poured in the “lunar” pavilion.  And one more thing.  Jumping
the astronaut at one point jumps over his own
shadow!  This is the most serious flaw. If only it were so
I wanted to show the Americans that they were on the moon, they could
don't show it.                                            
                                                                
    And finally.   When the camera is in someone's hands gently
moves and shoots landscapes so far and so close
Moons,  one of the crosses on the lens that form a grid
The viewfinder is behind the module antenna!                   
                                                                
    There is no point in discussing this topic further, since this is all
you have to see with your own eyes, and you may have completely
other assumptions.                                           
                                                                
    ANow about the book for American history buffs. Book
called"Whеn Whereе How And Why It Harрrend"and indeed
decorated in a fantastic way. It was published jointly by Sydney
and New York University, National Film Office and
US television archives, etc. But its main feature is that
that she is not objective. I won't go far. Main line
book is a leadership role or dominant position,
which is provided by the USA.  Here is an example for those who know
history.  I looked at the section about the Second World War and what did I find there?
read.  It turns out that the turning point in this monstrous war
came with the opening of a second front and the Allied landings in 1944
on the French coast.  Yes, if only these American ignoramuses
knew that they had opened a second front at the moment when
Soviet troops were already confidently approaching the end of the war, and the turning point
in the War attacked the Kursk Bulge. Feeling the taste of easy money in
in view of the victory, American troops in particular wished to take
Berlin before the Russians.  But it didn’t work out.  Then, the book in every possible way
belittles historical milestones that occurred in Russian history.
Be sure to represent Ivan the Terrible and Stalin as murderers,
not to mention our own in the same spirit. Yesif they knew what they were
American ancestors and even European monarchs at one time were
even greater horror and violent executions were carried out. Even the inhabitants of the new
light, having exterminated all the Indians were not included in this book. A for that
time this was an even greater genocide than it is now. About the flight
1 line written for the first man in space!!! And this despite
that the book is about history. For this reason, it is described with relish as
American pilots turned Japanese cities into atomic ash.
No, such books obviously need to be burned! I am for justice, and you?  
                                                                
    This is how history is made, especially modern history. I think that
I was able to convince you thata flight to the moon is one of
largest falsifications of the century, and that the American (Soros)
light, having exterminated all the Indians, were not included in this book. A for that
time this was an even greater genocide than it is now. About the flight
1 line written for the first man in space!!! And this despite
that the book is about history. For this reason, it is described with relish as
American pilots turned Japanese cities into atomic ash.
No, such books obviously need to be burned! I am for justice, and you?  
                                                                
    This is how history is made, especially modern history. I think,what
I was able to convince you thata flight to the moon is one of
largest falsifications of the century, and that the American (Soros)
a gift to our universities and other educational institutions is
a time bomb, opium for those who do not believe in their strength
people. But I think there is a lot behind this. In the end
It seems to me that we will still find out the real truth from all of this
questions.                                                       
                                                                
    Just when and in what future and in this life?