ZX Pilot #42 09 декабря 2005

Люди

Topic - one of the last open letters Nemo (Reply SirX'u).

               T E M A I



(C) SirX


               Hello!


   Wow! Nemo himself came down from heaven to earth and
drew attention to us sinners. Condescended
to answer some of the publications and my
(SirX) article in particular. Well I too
I can not pass by so many and so
same empty opus. How do I get exhausted
fill those squiggles to the last number,
who knows. Well, okay, let's begin.


   Nemo: Let's start from the beginning. 1. About
simple answers to simple questions. If
people do not understand what asked, or
My straightforward answer can lead to
unintended consequences - such as
break companies - he really did not
given. But read a long lecture.
Stupidity (or misunderstanding) - if sitting
too deep - may require not
to a paragraph, and the whole opus - so that
is small. Incidentally, it is written in
file about. It is clear that not read
interesting - much more pleasant solder
postings. If a person clearly raises
question and understand what asked -
the answer is always neat - again, see
"Open letters". And then, "Open letters" -
this is not a collection of cooking recipes - on a
There are other editions.


   SirX: x-m. Strange position. Though I
not as an aristocrat, as some, but
I can also quote: "If a man
idiot - this is a long time! "For those who are in the tank
- Useless pieces of music to write, if a person
a fool and not know what he asked. And if
intelligent, he is able to find anywhere else
information - likely to get Warped
becomes more complex. And you do so on
it bakes.


   Nemo: 2. At the expense of MS. Again, it is necessary
read a lecture. Everything connected with the PC - it is
stupidity - a rare exception, which
to "Op. Let" has nothing to do,
Yes, and Home computer, too. And those
distortions in the brain, which
encountered, the rod is
there. Where did it from there, I am now
I will explain ...


   SirX: the good of your lectures ... Not
dissipated to nothing. And with the exception
MS is more than you think, well, yes from
to know who lives in the sink and hears
only himself. Easier to say that all
pisishniki - fools, and I, damn it, all such
white and fluffy, and really clever ...


   Nemo: "Regardless of the intended
Do good for the consumer,
industrial or selskohoyaystvennogo
market, your customers are individual
consumers who have something to read or
heard about your product in some (read:
- Any, Nemo) media, which actually
FOR THIS AND PUBLISHED "....


   SirX: velikovat posledueschee presentation,
yes and pustovato ... But anyone interested
return to the previous number. And if
closer to the subject, then: the captain, a business in our
being done in all and all, it is not
news. Sale, if the brain does not wash -
small. And this is not news. Yes, that's just
Your case, I also doubt,
not only have to convince all that you have these
(ZX) are doing out of pure altruism. A
the brain are driving better than those for whom
write. So what really there, in the same
Arms are trying to do something and the same
ways. And do not be a visionary,
to understand that your open letter
nothing as the promotion of your offspring
and hayaniya other clones and platforms. Well
only then, oh yes, sort of like the questions
answer. But just like that.


   Nemo: Open Magazine "Your Computer"
Number 8 for 1998, p. 23. And what do we see?
And see "Description of the power supply
MS9022.02 "scheme in PCAD'e. It is very
solid. Silly Nemo is going to give in
the publication reference in his "Guide
User "- he does not know that
here it lies in wait for the PC-to lie in ambush. AND
Only three months after sharp falcon
noticed that in the scheme MISSING
Isolation (in the BP it
of course, is). Seemingly small change - but
not so simple. Lamer, BP bought a Nemo,
can take it at face value and
grounded (well, for example, an oscilloscope;
OR FOR EXTENSION OF COMP) to power
PARTY. And does not the fact that it thus
not kill. And who will be the deadline? Correctly.
Of course, as always in such cases,
psychologically - all hands on
themselves - how could I have been so wrong? - where
my mistake? - how could I see?
A casket just opened. Scheme, then
PCAD'e. I will explain in more detail. From the standpoint of
producer (production worker) scheme in
PCAD'e - this is true in the last
court ....


   SirX: Again reduce, for the second time
Again the same thing ... Well, conveniently,
do not say anything. What's really simple - all
put the blame on a hateful pisyuk, and I (Nemo)
sort of like to do with business. I know nothing,
your eyes do not. MS, of course, in all
fault. It's easy - when here so you can
shove the blame for this much intelligence does not
necessary. In general, what you worry, you do
themselves once wrote (oh look, these broke op.
let), that you find it difficult to make a claim
that the company private, on mutual
trust and there is something further in the same
spirit. Well, will kill and to hell with them, one
person asking stupid questions (with
Your point of view) will be less. And yet,
Captain, if you learn to lamer
use ostsilografami and all will be
do it yourself (extended complex) - they
become extinct as a species! ;))


   Nemo: Example number two. Advance
reservation that I pose than fantasy.
APL. Study launched torpedoes with AI
(Artificial intelligence). Program
crash, reboot mat. software.
Artificial intelligence and included
Torpedo-N-BI-P-A-E-T TARGET. As a result,
a penny gets that same submarine that she and
released. (First, a weak explosion). Boat
nods, and because of the shallow depth (100m)
hits the ground. The explosion of ammunition.
(A second, stronger explosion). Bulkheads
folded like a house of cards.


   SirX: Yes, you are clearly not enough to
state commission, they are also versions do not Hilo
pushed. And even better - write books, have
You are good at it. One trouble - who
read them will be ...


   Nemo: Now the analysis. What do you think
who wrote the software? Correctly. That they are in front
it read? Correctly, the RS-shnye magazines -
and to read more - there is nothing! A would be worth
read, for example, Norbert Wiener, when he
talks about the Fighting application of AI. There
have a specific conclusion that the choice of
PURPOSE AND INAPPROPRIATE charging. This
strategic decision.

   Further, my analysis. Intelligence (regardless
from its origin) is always
implies consciousness. A consciousness is always
Spontaneously, ie, Probabilistically. It is told
a Russian mathematician, opoloumevshy on
old age and bumped into mysticism.
In other words, any AI is unpredictable.

   Let's try to estimate the probability /
Inadequate / Suspense /
Spontaneity. This can be done. A

   In the hand-SAM, for example, there is a blocker
"Your / someone else." If the aircraft is missing
such unit, then he knocks - whether it is
three times his own. And such was the case. But in
If blocker is essentially absent
Selection of targets. So there was a lock or not
was it?

   And finally. Who is responsible?
RS-Schnick, who even had not occurred
thought blocker? Or the boss
that after watching Hollywood movies
(The same publicity, a "Matrix"
What is ...), and believing in
infallibility of AI did not think to put
blocker?


   SirX: yes, you have surpassed yourself! Blin,
You would have bought in Hollywood with giblets,
would sell, I have no doubt. And do not
to say that I judge myself on, I just
been reading your opus, I
Your mania for giants to me has passed. Would you
continuation of the same matrix to write. And in
tragedy blamed pisyushniki, unequivocally!
Anyone else. Damn, really - what
space, how many people you can blame it
is so easy. And how many porasstrelivat
can, in Veselukha, and the captain? And,
importantly, all proshnurovano, it's simple.


   Nemo: Or, perhaps, to look at
wider problem?


   SirX: Please, do not!


   Nemo: How old would say, Heidegger:
"Careful with cybernetics. Soon
understand that this is not so easy. "


   SirX: but this is really good
words (still have - no matter your mouth;) AND
long have you been a crony relations
Heidegger? Another kind of "bro" wrote ...


   Nemo: 3. What does it mean "not found
Claudia's film? "See price - list p.1.12:
Keyboard film DC-4, <...> .... 60
cu Ie at this time, 246 rubles.
(K = 4.1). it is certainly not cheap, but
alternative, namely, PC -
Claudia, would cost three times more expensive: 500 p.
(Roughly, and it at least!) Controller itself,
Shipment ~ $ 100. 200-300r. - Connection
(Again provodochki - with the corresponding
risk of burn in refining complex - TIRES
- That at 90% NO). Price of most keyboards
can be ignored - it's rubbish - RS-shny.
Incidentally, these keyboards, DC-4, in the past
was invested in 2 thousand rubles. Similarly, with
mouse - the basic price - it's controller. A
where I came from a mouse, I nachhat. Although
I would like to be home
production - I hope to explain why
there is no need ...


   SirX: Well here is my mistake - there was no
Your price list at hand, I confess. And what
As for me already as a user, then
hell I do not have such happiness, to communicate
with your firm - were good examples of the
eyes. Let me wear out here at
home to get what I need for sintering, but
while it is possible, I'll do it.
In short, to make things clear: You are
call the garbage bin Spectrum.


   Nemo: And in other commercial PC -
man carried us all - thank
God, not feet-first - a stroke. Probably
overworked at work a couple of years ago,
when cracked on behalf Zonova X -
Trade'vsky Sound. Maybe overwork
occurred when trying to repair / adjustment
Scorpion'ov, 30% of which are already fully
exhausted their resource and does not fully
maintainable. As the saying goes, bad
head chef hands resting Clerk did not produce.
So what I do not like Scorpion? Probably
for the same as the PC - in fact Scorpion - it
PC shnaya firm DEPLETE SPECTRUM.


   SirX: yeah ... Once you have one
edeinstvenny and unique, all
beaver. Candle, pancake,
found ... Not your words were
ZX-Format'ah, how do you see
development of cake - Cooperation with
producers of other clones, etc.
(Hereinafter, all citations are given by
memory, wishing to read in detail looking for
themselves or otherwise, to pilot
coming out with another six months - there's no time
superfluous).


   Nemo: 4. On account of my work in
Scorpion'e. From the standpoint of lamer, work
employment and partnership firms are indistinguishable.
Lamer is simply unable to understand what
difference.


   SirX: of course, who are now in this
recognized ... Simply write what I lamer.
Again the easy way out looking for the captain! In any
case, the information that I
possessed at that moment, you just
worked there! And I am inclined to this -
otherwise anywhere else so could be at loggerheads
some things.


   Nemo: 5. At the expense of refinement of the controller.
Crazy stick to no good arguments. Except
of ignoring the standards up to no good
communicate well. Finally, with this
revision to the third component of the fly in
trash ...


   SirX: the account of the revised agreement,
familiarized with the scheme of the desire was gone
so complex mutilate. And at the expense of standards -
You say, not so that looking at
them.

   Most of the future, I scribble
again omitted, it does not concern me, if
some of these people is something
want to say - welcome to
Pilot platform.


   Nemo: 6. At the expense of program
compatibility. In these two programs
mistakes in programming, ie, in
code. Manufacturer of components for this
is not responsible. Contact
directly to the manufacturers of software - if you
pay for it. And if you got on
freebie - then we must be silent in a rag, and
not to give bad example to others. In
letter was never found references
about any payments. Ie man on
"Bird rights" rocking those same rights for
three.


   SirX: Well - the classics, when
man has nothing more to say in my
excuse, he begins to gag
interlocutor. You would have said: go
come out:) That's one. Accurate, and
You can offend.

   Second: UFO V. Mednonogova, which
it was declared freeware for a long time. A
proizovaditelyam Battle Command in general
foolish to put the claim. Tell me, where I
I can officially buy this game and I
do.

   Third. Again, easier to say that
someone else's fault, not mine. Well, another would. Why
Well then a number of programs
that work on most other
clones are not going to KAY? Above, I blamed you
non-compliance with standards - actually I
I do not know what else can we explain this fact.

   Fourth. Manufacturer of components,
you say? And who are you? How can you be about
something to say? Your words at the expense of
that you are a manufacturer of components -
empty sound. How you can get me in something
blame? Rights you have no more than
me. Yes, I can illegally possess games
which were discussed - but I do them just
I own and am not trying to make money.
Decode the hint? And yet, what I
I ask. So:

   Show your license to
producing components. And most importantly, where
Your license for production companies
is compatible with ZX-Spectrum? I do not think that
You appealed to the Amstrad (how many remember
This company owns the rights to ZX) and
bought the right to produce clones. So
silent-ka in the rag itself!

   And finally. Yet from some
remnants of respect, do not you write and you.
The general tone of your articles is
dogmatical character so that
I have a doubt in your mental
health. Healthy, normal person
admits that may be wrong. You
opinion seems to be a single dokoy
on all issues - such conclusion
naprashivatsya after reading your opus.
From the opera: "All men are whores, and I am holy!"

   And the wild, this is what your disease
progessiruet. You start being rude and
rude people in the OP and correspondence. So the hell
same dick need such as hueputalo and Hamley
you? Pleased when the rough? And the remaining
kleintov lose, and there is your office
scribe to come. Think at your leisure if
What is left. And try tolerant, and
civilized people communicate - will help. A
at the expense of opus - Love can not be forced. Y
Everyone has their own point of view, and everyone is entitled 
to to have it. And insulting people for it to

your hand - disgusting.

   And that's it. Bye.