Nicron #18 31 января 1997

Графика

Humor - Small Encyclopedia of Computer beings, Antonov and Maverick.

    ° °

            Encyclopedia of Small Computer beings

    ° °



(C) MDF HACKER.

Compiled and supplemented by Antonov for assistance known
person - my friend Maverick'a.
Edited in word by 'MDF hacker.



    ° Chapter One-sysops °



1. Type: sysop perfect

   Type: good-natured

   Family: Independent

Most small form sisopov, today found only in special nurseries. 
This mass extinction is a consequence of the natural goodness 
sysop ideal not zhalevshego titles or Extra SysOp for any nosy 
users (see "user"). The result is deflated File arias crap ekhi 
and unimaginable accounts for the long-distance communication. 
This kind of sysop included in the family of independent, 
because majority of individuals this species had its own BBSki, 
and therefore not very appreciated their level.

(SysOp).

2. Type: sysop sly

   Type: secretive

   Family: Forced

This species has a much larger number of individuals than the 
ideal. Key features: sparing of increase, the maximum distorts 
its BBS by establishing relations unimaginable UL / DL, the 
time limit, continuously harassed respectable, but unfamiliar 
users decrease access time and download amount'a. Is not 
respected in other sisopov because of its ambitious 
inclinations (Instantly offlin'it all valuable files, despises 
chat mode and to avoid contact with their own kind. Forced - 
depend on their bosses, and this justified when talking about a 
possible download'e. 

3. Type: sysop fair

   Type: tired

   Family: Independent

The closest relative of sysop ideal or is his mutated form. 
Because of adverse conditions, this type of BBSnyh has 
undergone numerous metamorphoses before finally form. Outcome: 
sociability that the optimal level for all users (acceptable UL 
/ DL, a lot of time). Never refuses chat'a and ready to break 
the news, as well as no harmful manifestations, such as: 
omission of information has no special value or inclination to 
lower anyone's level. Note: this kind of fairly successfully 
competes with yet no less strong views (2) and has a greater 
chance victory through natural selection.


NB: The author deliberately refrained from publishing specific

    names, but believes that anyone can accurately

    determine the membership of any sysop.

            (To be continued)