Letter No. 286

617170 07.27.01.

            Hello Nemo!

   I decided to contact you with a new order.
So, at the same time, explain about the implementation
dissatisfaction with my previous order (or rather,
the last two - they came together, in one
new packaging). First, about what I ordered
called you: order dated March 5, 2001 (although
the date on the receipt is March 2, apparently not
transferred (didn't make it after the weekend)
   newspaper "Abz@ts" No. 3 - 1 pc. 2 USD
   Used software - 30 disks 30 USD
   Email magazines 3 discs - 10 USD
   + "OL" stamps 42 USD x 4.7 (brand) =
197 rub.

   order dated 05/29/01
   clean floppy disks "Izot" 2 x 2 packs. = 2 x
20 USD = 40 USD!!!
   Used software 30 pcs. 30 USD
   + "OL" stamps 70 USD x 5.0 = 350 rub.
   The total should be 30 + 3 + 1 + 40
+ 30 + 1= 105 disks. And I received 15.06.
only 85 (I am attaching an inventory from that bandera-
Li) - there were only 20 blank disks
pcs. (2 packs). I agree that there are a hundred possible
but I didn't make it clear enough in mine
letter with the contents of your order. but I think that
this issue can be resolved quite broadly
- just send me the missing 20 discs
along with this my order (if you are satisfied -
suggests such a solution).  And I decided to order
another 30 used software disks for 30 USD. 30 USD x
5.3 (July) = 159 rub. - sent by post
translation today, 07.27.01.

   My address: [...censored...]

   Best wishes. 07/27/01


61717021.11.01.

              Hello Nemo!

   For some reason, lately I've been thinking...
tries to remind you to fulfill my
orders - such problems have not arisen before -
lo. So in relation to my last problem
kaza dated July 27, 2001 (date of transfer) that
the same question: when will I receive it? Sleep
blame everything on the poor performance of the post office,
in my opinion, it’s not worth it - such selectivity
unlikely. Or did it take you a lot of time?
me and strength participation in CCO1? I'm kidding, of course
but I wanted them to not forget about simple
users from the periphery.

   That's all for me. Sincerely.

   P.S. Contents of my order dated July 27, 2001.
3.11. Used floppy disks with software - 30 pcs. - 30 USD
30 USD x 5.3 (coefficient for July) = 159 rub. +
16 rub. brands.
   Also I asked a question about underperformance
previous order from 29.05 - I received
only 2 packages (20 pcs.) instead of 4 numbers
ty disks.  Receipts for transfers and
an inventory of the parcels received, confirming
knowing this fact, I sent it by registered mail
on the same day - 07/27/01

   P.S.S. I'm sending stamps on 18 p.m. - I don’t know
what is the coefficient now, I took 6 at random -
1 USD, i.e. 3 USD x 6 rub. = 18 rub.

   P.S.S.S. My return address remains unchanged
ny:



617170 12/13/01.

               Dear N!

   1. Your first letter has been received
06.08.01. / sent 07.27.01. Your second
Roy letter and translation received 11.28.01 /
sent21.11.01.  Regarding the second
letters - payment receipt and inventory should not be sent
should - if you doubt whether
Do I have them and are they clear enough?
the mail mechanism is working (and all this is working)
works), then photocopies. Payment documents
you remain in your arms.
   2. Regarding your orders. Under-investment
The transfer to the parcel actually took place.
I'm very sorry.  Unfortunately, at the moment
detection of this fact, clean disks are
ran out - find new ones (commodity co-
personality) over the past month or two have not been successful
moose  This explains the delay. Arrival
trying to make a replacement. In your order (in
part of the order)
   1) Underinvestment of 20 “Izot” discs (20
cu) R Replacement with THREE sets of different
magazines (electronic) (30 USD).
   2).  New order of 30 software/used disks (30
cu) R is sent.
   3).  As compensation for the delay
and a change in the composition of the order for the magazine "Radio-
amateur" No. 9 for review (clause 2.3.
price - 9 USD) I consider this incident
exhausted.
                                  (c) Nemo


P.S.  Of course, if it is not possible to remove
copier, then you did the right thing -
but...

Share your thoughts about the article