Dispute - Breadth of mind or slavery to illusions?

Breadth of mind or slavery to illusions?


                 What have I hidden from myself?
           Where the main secret is hidden in the depths of my soul
            Why do I dig where all meaning disappears?
               Searching for yourself, suspecting in advance
                That everything is before us, and I am everything...
                            SLIP.

   Dispute between mathematics and poetry.  The mathematician states  
- You haven’t thought, dear, why is it happening that
everything that is around you was created by mathematicians, not lyricists,
physicists, not humanists?
   How often do mathematicians and physicists like to argue that
are they smarter than any lyricist?
   This is where we should start this article. How often have I heard how
smart people try to find justification for art, lyrics, poetry,
faith and religion. Yes, mathematics and physics undoubtedly create things
material and spiritual reasoning, what have they created? 
   And I will say this: if we imagine our world as an energy
a field where there is a charge value and a certain carrier of this charge.
Charge flows from one carrier to another (exchange
information, for those who do not understand), respectively the value
this charge can also be different (in theory, it should be removed and
charge carriers, since we are talking about a field, but it’s easier this way
It’s easier to abstract this picture).  That is, this
explanation for mathematicians who can hereso easy
imagine the whole world as a kind of field. If the magnitude of this charge
too large, the media may be destroyed (i.e. deprived
initial charge, and therefore its initial information,
which he carried within himself). To avoid this, charge
shared with other carriers, thus happening
the movement of particles (carriers) is thus carried out
perpetual motion machine of the universe (pulsation). 
   In human society this manifests itself something like this: let’s say
a person is overcharged and if he does not find a discharge, then sooner or
late it can lead to a nervous breakdown. A nervous breakdown
will lead to destructive actions (destruction of matter). Charge
accumulates in a person one way or another, it simply happens in
as a result of fluctuations in the “field” I described below, that is
constant movement of charge almost like from plus to minus, only
here we are not talking about the charge itself, but about its magnitude. B
In human physiology, this charge can be defined as libido,
i.e.  sexual desire.  Freud also said that our
instinct doesn't actually imply complete as such
the desire for comfort (although many biologists think differently,
instincts, in their opinion, when controlling living matter, are always looking for
comfort) it initially also implies self-destruction.
That is, a person has a functionconstant synthesis of this
energy (libido), while the other part is instinct
causes matter to reduce this charge, saving it from destruction
- eros. 
   There is a direct way in animal physiology to reduce this charge,
of course - sexual intercourse, and the struggle for survival. About a person
we can say exactly the same thing, but the structure of our psyche is more complex,
than the psyche of an animal.  Complicating the structure implies
increase in charge, i.e.  we no longer have enough sexual intercourse and
simple struggle for animal existence in order to
release this charge. This is where art comes to the rescue,
religion and science.  Simply put, if a poet does not write poetry,
it means he either drinks, or beats, or robs, or finds
another way to realize energy potential, which is possible with
It’s a stretch to call it sublimation. 
   If human society is isolated from lyricists and lyricism,
then as a result we have a strong social weakening of the system,
which could lead to the death of society. Although the energy carrier is not
can be destroyed, destruction only means deprivation of it
charge of energy.  A society devoid of lyricism, of course, cannot
die to the end, there are simply two options for it
further development.   Option one is simplification,
involution, when a society falling apart will lead to degradation
person who will be obligedsimplified, for example, to an animal
level and thereby deprive yourself of a high charge.  That is
there will be a usual return to an animal, more primitive
life.  Option two - society finds a different way of implementation
energy charge, for example - war, conflict, religion, and
etc. There are of course many paths and paths, I will consider them
I won't.  Lyricism holds civilization, it helps to reset this
energy itself, just like mathematics or physics. 
   Essentially, I brought together all the processes occurring in society and in
human life to simple mathematics, i.e.  every process in
society is a natural pattern and if you argue about the benefits
lyricism and mathematics, it turns out that we are simply talking about
amount of charge.  And this whole dispute ends in a dead end of absurdity.
Of course, considering the need for lyricists in society, I went
too far, but to be honest, this is the “field” theory, although
applicable to the biological laws of nature (it is universal),
but I understand perfectly well its inferiority and have used it only for
so that mathematicians, and not lyricists, think about this. 
   However, here the question certainly arises: why then does everyone
not to be physicists and mathematicians, if the essence is only
dumping this same energy?  Actually really
a mathematician from the point of view of nature can become a lyricist and
on the contrary.  Bothothers are needed in nature to comply with no one
energy balance, since the field is not separate
elements are a single organism fighting for its universal
survival.  If in human nature, in his social nature
life will need, for some reason, to make sure that
There are fewer physicists and more lyricists, then she will certainly
will do.  Those.  there will be a transfusion of energy from the larger to
less, so the metabolism of the field is respected.  Are we needed here?
proof, if you need it, here is a simple example:
   Let's imagine a tribe, like the Mambo, in faraway Africa.
All of them from time immemorial lived without grieving, until the disaster happened.
for some reason, for example - distortion of the magnetic field
land, as a result of which the rivers changed their original
channel  What does nature do in this case so that this tribe
could it survive? It makes it possible for a person to be born,
who knows how to look for water underground with the help of two branches.
Such a person may be a bad hunter, but thanks to him
the tribe has a chance to survive. Thus, in this person there is great
part of the energy is spent searching for this very water, and a small part
goes, for example, to hunt, for his own survival.  In everything
tribe for a long time the energy that should have been free
be implemented in relation to the search for water, as a resulther
absence accumulated in them.  And with the advent of this
a person, since he is looking for water for them, their energy should feed him.
Those.  his relatives must take care of him and thus
give the accumulated energy in them to this person who has it
no.  This is how this energy is exchanged. The picture is very
rough and has its own nuances that should be thought through. to me
I’m just too lazy to describe them all, but I think the core idea is
accessible and understandable. This unusual person can easily be compared with
lyricist who appeared in our society only in response to
lack, for example, of simple emotions (i.e. basic exchange
energy). 
   The conclusion here is this: lyricism is just an outlet for “extra” energy.
invented by the very evolution of society so that it could be
save yourself. The word "superfluous" is put in brackets here because
There is nothing superfluous in nature and this concept is relative here. 
   Now again to the question of the dispute between lyricists and mathematicians.
Here is a certain gentleman who declares that he has done everything in this world
mathematics.  But I can say with the same absurdity that everything
made the lyrics (although both, as I already said, are simply
energy charge)! 
   I explain: Spiritual and material values are inseparable, one
cannot exist without the other.  Civilization is based on
an empty and useless idea for its time. It is basedon
faith, and faith is nothing more than an empty spiritual pursuit.
Today we can say that the first
"man-ape" who threw apt words instead of a spear
into his enemy (referring to Z. Freud) did it correctly, so
how civilization was founded. But judge for yourself, for your time
it was nothing more than stupid fun that turned into tragedy.
     So, let's look at this with you: For the ancient
"man-apes" was correct:  
1) Takes care of food.
2) Takes care of offspring
   That is, this is a real pattern. Now let's talk about
unnecessary things, about empty spiritual research. It was wrong
from the point of view of personal survival:  
1) Take a stick in your hands and draw something on the ground.  
2) Take a stick in your hands and start hitting dry wood with it, 
tapping the rhythm.

   The first two correct directives are physics and mathematics.
The second incorrect directives are lyric and primitive
stupidity.  But thanks to this stupidity, civilization appeared.
Physics and mathematics took on the executive role, and thought,
faith, lyrics, art took on the role of thought, spirit, i.e.
an empty and seemingly unnecessary waste of one’s vitality.

   So why does nature still come up with lyricists, why
it makes people think about empty things when they should
to survive, and for the purpose of survivalcreate material things? 
   In the end, tell mathematicians and physicists, you are great
materialists of this world, because materialism implies, and soap
like some kind of material that can be touched. And if so, lyricists
they create and change matter just like willows. 

 I’ll add on my own: I’m just thinking about this topic, and not doing anything.
I affirm because I myself can explain all the processes in
society not only with the help of the “field” theory, i.e. it's not mine
opinion.  When I hear all these arguments about who is smarter and
I don’t have anything left for society to need more than mathematics or poetry
another, as soon as you grin in response. In nature everything is needed and
everything is there. 

               Searching for yourself, suspecting in advance
                  That everything is before us, and I am everything...
                      Best regards, SLIP.