Optron #40
03 октября 2000 |
|
Litstranichka - Murphy's laws of action on the issue of electronic publications (a story about an assembly PCP).
The laws Murphy on the issue of electronic publications {} Paul Vysotsky, 2000 Theorem "Optron" Free electronic edition ever does not come out in time. Laws "OPTRON" I Act covers: The artist always draws a picture to "cover" with a delay. Corollary: 1) If the picture painted in time, artist does not have time to pass it to the editor. 2) In time passed just such a picture that is so bad, that may not be published. Act II Music By category numbers never comes music available to the publisher. Corollary: 1) in time redaktsiiyu fall only the melodies, which are not podtseplen player; while in the editorial had not at hand programs that could fix it position. 2) As soon as the next edition of the newspaper is published, the editorial makes it clear that his music is not ideal for this and the next number. Act III dating During final assembly of the newspaper editorial is always forgets to fix the date of its publication. Consequence: If the wording did not forget to fix the release date, the newspaper anyway does not go that day. Act IV unnecessary edits The more difficult to amend the text of the newspaper on the next stage of its assembly are any changes, the more likely that later These changes will be superfluous and would have to redo everything again. Act V mirror editing The more people who edit the text and the more editing stage took place, the text becomes worse. Consequence, a paradox: Unedited text in general anywhere no good. Act VI of excess The more people engaged in production of newspapers, the less it goes. Consequence, a paradox: If the editorial board takes at least one of staff, the newspaper generally does not go long time. VII Paradox Editing If the author considers his job very well, the wording necessarily exists a person who thinks it a terrible and "Freeze" of its publication. Corollary: 1) If the author did not like his job and he sends it for publication, since he still does this, Work gets rave reviews All editorial staff. 2) more like the author to his work and the more members of the editorial board share his view, the less likely that This work will be published at all. Act VIII inhibition The greater good and interesting material gathered for the newspaper, the more retained its output and increases the probability that they become completely irrelevant. IX law prejudiced reader The better and more interesting number, the more desire in the reader that before anything not written in the newspaper, write a skeptical review. Consequence: Any criticism of the oppressive and detrimental to the Editor. Consequence, a paradox: In the absence of criticism of the desire to work generally disappears. X Act quarrelsome The author is always dissatisfied with what changes were made in his work, and the editor is always dissatisfied with the fact that the author does not take into account his wishes. Consequence, a paradox: If the author and editors are no longer differences exist, then either this author perstaet write for a newspaper, or itself Newspaper vskorsti closes. Conclusion: People who have their own ideas and that engaged in some common cause to implement them, never able to get along with each another. Together without disputes are only those who never sees and does not want to see the results of their work.
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 23 November