Open Letters #05
30 ноября 2000 |
|
Nemo open letters № 5.6
Dear Vyacheslav G.! Please send me the latest price lists. And please explain what happened to the "Logros"! In your the last directory I have not discovered. If it is liquidated, it was left there his successor? Where are all the programs? (Incidentally, the catalog of Logros'a I did not received. Several times sent the money it is they, not popular, every time returned back). Sincerely. 624201 16.10.2000 Dear N! Sending, in addition to price list (s You've invested) disc "Op. Let". What do you think, what is sent to disk "Op. Let"? From excessive my writer's itch or what? Why should I spend money the packing of letters and responses to them? Clarification about what happened to Logros'om given in the "Op. Let" a dozen times. As for the receiver Logros'a, it problematic. And the problem is not lack of the right people or the absence of appropriate technologies. The problem of non-compliance with copyright and distribution networks. By the way, the networks find themselves appropriate software as difficult as outside them. Ruined traders software, they sit on beans. Well, unless that happens rarely joy to rob the author of freshly baked software. Perhaps it makes sense to treat directly to the author, although it is more expensive than a trader, because his base programs, as a programmer - just one program, and only her he can sell. Ie lack of choice, plus the fixed costs to establish new relationships in the mail. Ie, as they say, for what fought for it and ran. If earlier paid traders and there was a proposal, then Now even if you have money and desire, they do not pay. As they say, they had saved for traders. Establish distribution software without a significant improvement in compliance with copyright law is virtually impossible - it's a loss. Ie the problem is not in chips and software - a problem In the users. It is hoped that they will become a useful life skill, like paying money for someone else's work. So, for now, could advise the address to see "Op. Let" and refer to them. There are proposals for software. Of course, God forbid, the news that but the public in their entirety. on increasingly rely not on reason outlined above. I have met with such rhetorical questions in the networks, such as: "What's that, now for all the software you pay for? For any program? Not at all. Pay should be only for those programs where there is copyright, ie, unequivocal demand the author's commercial distribution. Imagine a situation in an ideal form, namely: copyright respected in almost all cases, yes, even the least 50% of cases. How it might look like in practice, ie what would have been the actual practice of software distribution? The situation would have been quite an original and even somewhat comical. Well, first of all demomeyking, for example, would have been a freeware or shareware. Why? Therefore, that nobody wants, except the masters exotic genre. In fact, by the trial would have to pay extra napisatelyam users for viewing their creations. It's really that was such a case. Dmitry Lomov wrote as a demo, and then the entire grid wear out, aggressively offering look at his creation. Even the fact that called the "system" software, and any various latter-day, and freshly baked stillborn OS'i would have been in the same frivernom / shareware classroom. This is also Hochma, but I'm afraid not lamer will learn, what is there to humor. And here, for example, ISDOS would have been in a class of copyright, Professional software, ie for money. And osepisateley layer that form now, "public opinion" in the platform, would find themselves again in a comic situation. System all crap and slander, but it works and demand, and for She paid the money, but their creations with across the slope, and so on - for some reason - nobody wants. Would change and strategy Conduct of the commercial software, ie professional programmers (in Unlike kodokropateley, or simply coders). They would be very clearly understood one simple thing: that the required investment of money either two or three years on bread and water (which is essentially the same money). Real, only two strategies: 1) either you write high-quality work, commercial, professional product and gave it to Zadar - the rights of shareware / frivernyh - and as a result of do yourself a brand and name, and already THEN (TE INVESTMENTS their labor, TE SAME MONEY) were able to for its next program get real money, ie, RECOIL attachments CAPITAL Poimena status PROS. Or 2) you spend money on advertising DIRECT and alert users to benefit from this money. Also, they would understand and others just thing that you need to write software for advanced component models, which number in the market increases, rather than under the model already obsolete, which in two or three years come out of operation due to wear. But since copyright is not respected, then invest the money is not meaningful. Therefore, these thoughts of programmers do not attend. Would change and my activities as a manufacturer of Hardy. That's what I can do now, if a program does not go? Yes nothing. Missing information as well as leverage on the market software. How do I know what this program? As far as she is popular? how it professionally? Who wrote it? Can man wrote it, bring it to mind and, most importantly, if he has any one wanted to? Does it have the means to replace the disks? But we decided that it consider the reverse situation, namely: copyright respected. The script in this case next. 1. User puts me on notice that such a program, let's call it "XYZ" is not going to KAY'e. 2. I called Trader (note Not a programmer, ie, not in Software Companies) and ask: "What's" XYZ ""? And he I meet (roughly speaking, the options two), ie either: 2.1. "Glory, this is totally left the program and its almost NOT BUY" or "It's trousers, Glory "and, in this case, I'm not doing anything, you never know who the hooligans. Even you can not read. 2.2. "Glory, this program is among the five most popular." Explanation: here, in fact, I got INDEPENDENT Peer review (ie, 2.1 and 2.2). Therefore, Section 3. 3. I'm calling in Software COMPANIES, say about the following: "Dear," XYZ "is not going to KAY'e ... Look, please, that you were not stuck together, and replace a drive users KAY'ev. If this is done will, I will give the command to hack (and it is not copyright infringement, violation - this is when the program has the status of author, replicated). Cost me 200 rub. (October 2000). After What is your underwear is exposed for all to see (in the same networks for example), and you will have a corresponding row and STILL drive to replace but at the same time poimeesh LOSS OF TRADEMARKS (and this, as we explained above, the same money). Therefore, quickly, quickly, in a waltz tempo - month deadline. " Public poorly understands that compliance copyright - is not so much selfish, a fiscal issue as a backbone Institute in the platform. There is copyright - all clear (there is information), and there is a possibility of action, there is no copyright, nothing is clear and nothing can be done. Well, finally, what is the answer to this Lameroo of networks, which brought FEES ALL "SOFT"? Really do not have to pay more than 10% of the programs, ie in nine out of ten cases, the software that has at the moment, money is not worth it, but it creates some problems. This software can not be called something, so unmotivated activity without using the hands of the head. When compliance with copyright law is manifested clearly and directly. And the programmer THREE THINK TWICE put copyright or not. Because the payment of money there are certain obligations, and they have perform. And unless the copyright is not respected, ie not paid the money, and bribes smooth. if you do not pay the money, then no You are not obliged to do, do not look a gift horse in the mouth. Buggy program - well let the buggy, it's just your problem, and nothing more. I would like to discuss and this time, who a trader, why do you need and what he differs from a software firm. Public confuse these concepts. This is partly explained by the fact that the software companies themselves must now act as a trader. This is extremely inefficient. consider an example. In a previous letter suggested to go for software at the following addresses: 1. 85321, Ukraine, Dimitrov, mn "West", 79, Apt. 12. Maksimenko, Mikhail Mikhailovich. Tel.: (06239) 6-21-26 Product: 32-s new mission to "FT-1"; editor of the game's levels. Soft-Firm: Compu-Studio ----------------------------------------- 2. 18005, Ukraine, Cherkassy, ul. Shevchenko, D. 367 / 1, Apt. 37. Bezuglov Andrey. Tel. (0472) 43-37-97 product: "Crime of the Santa Claus: Deja Vu " Advertising: ZX-F N 8. Soft-Firm: Brokim Soft Trader: 410026, Saratov, ul. Emlyutina, 49, square. 42. Tarasov, Oleg. ----------------------------------------- 3. 601908, Russia, Vladimir region., R. Carpet-8, 16, Apt. 73. Alexei Shirokov. Product: "12 secret books." Soft-Firm: Demiung Ash. What can I say, carefully studied this list? 1. Tob. Maksimenko rest. Why? Code bad? Code is not being. There are no conditions mailing software (incidentally, the same applies to N figure 3). In addition, it is Ukraine. A what does this mean in terms of trading (Ie, sales)? Letter to the Ukraine is a month and is 8 now. - Normal and 10 rubles. - air (it's up to 20 grams, as a handwritten piece of paper does not exceed one page), or 19 rubles. 60 kopecks. - Normal and 26 rubles. 00 kopecks. - air, if weight is greater than 20 g (but not more than 100 g). Similarly back. And how do you find out how much to pay? Phone only, and it's the same money. Okay, found how much to pay. Translation is a month. Letter from the disc - even a month, plus 19 rubles. 60 kopecks. What we have in the end? Let the disk itself the program costs only 30 rubles. (Less does not happen even for trousers). 20 rub. - shipment from the Ukraine. 20 rub. - Visibility. talking (or writing for 8 rubles. there - back). Total we have at least 70 rubles. Plus 2 (4 month brake and hassle. It's at best. And really, in my opinion, the total cost will be $ 3 to $ 5. Because there is overhead, and the envelopes themselves are worth the money. 2. Tob. Bezugly also operates correctly. Things recall my word, this boy away go. Why? Rather than gouge on the keyboard, he showed a professional approach. What is it expressed? 1). He took out an ad (in the ZX-F N 8), ie Invested in his project, and reduced the risks of potential buyers as they represent about what they receive. 2). The most important thing - he has appointed Traders ie created the structure. Now he can spud with equal success (and costs) of both Ukraine and Russia. What I can I say? Well done. And even in the presence of Trader drive will cost $ 2 ($ 3 for month (ideally!) delay performance, because brakes at the intersection border removed as unnecessary postage costs. One bad - the trader has no phone, and again, there are no conditions e-mailing. I myself have received this information, apparently from the network, and then some lamer, probably, this information "came off" as "perekantovke in the networks. 3. About Comrade. Shirokova say nothing is possible. Too little information. Here is a debriefing. Now imagine a situation in which there is a trader, who in the presence of all three programs. Who would you like to have addressed in this case? If you need all three programs. efficiently then the trader, at least twice. That's as many times less have to pay. So need a trader or not? And if the trader is stealthily, ie dishonest? How is it to find out whether he donates grandmother software firms? A must watch for these messages Software firms in the media Spectrum'a. At least in the same "Op. Let". A software firm has the right not only to nominate (appoint) trader, but it is retracted. This so-called right of Investiture (ie assignment (order) of the representation of interests). And he who appoints has the right and removed, it is the users have little understanding. Say, if The software firms say about that the Scorpion, for example, sells stolen, you have a very good understanding of what is at stake. Namely that software development firm receives no money from it "Trader." And if you have any problems with the software, after finding out where you bought it, you know, where you will be sent. And the feeling is probably not very pleasant for buying stolen goods. (C) Nemo From Dennis Kittel Hello, (c) Nemo! I bought it means you have to SS'000 KAY 1024 I'm having some troubles with his connection to the SGA monitor (fig with inverter LN 3 are not passed), but I still pull up the complex to Monica but again there was a problem with the signal on BR16HT KAY'e it is not excluded as an independent signal and now the entire image (or rather the picture) can be obtained "castrated." The second problem lies in the fact that I was not running IS-DOS! No version (And I am their third piece tried), ie not start floppy with Open Letters, no Chic 'Classic. At first I thought that this is due to incomplete matching lamelek on controller drive but the other program (in Including and multiloaderami) works fine except TEST PR06 from your system drive, and IS-DOS'a me more and more seems like a ROM. Although it has not only like I changed the SH 93 and IS-DOS earned! Well, at least ZX-FORMAT'y yet earned. It is true there is one problem I have no sane SH-shki. : (. So I'm sending you this buggy SH-shku in the hope that you have me change it on the other, because as I understand I have a PC to guarantee a few months. And now for some abstract theme. Here in O.L. You write: "the use of IBM-disc provokes users to move on the IBM PC (OL - 110 txt) - do not tell if I have a CGA Monique it turns out that it provokes me to go to a PC or Amiga? Imho there, Amiga I simply do not necessary, and for the PC that Monique is rather weak, but in Basically I do not see whether the purchase Home PC, because PC is usually purchased as a game unit, and for these purposes it is suited Sony Play Station. So here you are a little wrong, but what am I I say - on the XS connector 10 does not hurt to bring signals to the C6 and CS and another BPIGHT would not hurt. A few words about the controller AT-Claudia and active mouse: I think that this device should run to the masses, as Claudia out of the system, but to Speccy they are no longer produced, and make a new not everyone can juzverej. Bat And like everybody, but not everyone can do. And finally, the question - whether in your IDE-controller to connect a CD-ROM? Examples of its use: 1-on management and 2-button sidyukami when listening to music (rewind pause, etc.) view (or rather read) all there pictures, samples, etc. Well that's all it seems, I hope that you will change my SH-shku, and then somehow it is not convenient all my friends to pick up:). Sincerely. BYE! P.S. On the accompanying diskette with IS DOS'om to HDD controller did not find drivers for it (HDD), had friends borrow. 230001 20.10.2000 Dear, Dennis! 1. Your packet received 10/17/2000. 2. Spectrum-concept vehicles includes The display device is TV rather than anything else. Different Display options joints so much that account for this in a single design impossible and not necessary. Telestandart the same one, and so good. Display System (Video Processor) Spectrum'a designed on the basis of precisely telestandarta. Therefore, no matter how good a display, Moreover, you can see on the TV, you will not see it. Ignoring the parameters telestandarta - a rejection of the ideology Spectrum'a, ie this is not Spectrum. Thus the "castrated" idea leads to "castrate" the results. 3. It is likely that it is really a VG93. Even in their original packaging occurs in about 10% of marriage, and explicit. With such debris party ICs expected to work perfectly the other 90% IC is simply not serious. Continue in the pre-marketing testing to be included and the test to work with ISDOS'om. The difference between the recording formats and TRDOS ISDOS is different number and length of the sectors. With a longer sector can be obtained large amount of information on a floppy disk, about 15%, as done in ISDOS'e, by reducing the proportion of driver records for synchronize the sectors. However, some VG93 this mode does not "digest". Sending 2 pcs. VG93. 4. Surplus resources IBM-provoking public display at various attempts to "trigger" of these resources. And this, in its turn, leads to the erosion of standards, the growth of software incompatibilities and etc. etc. Problems appear much more than positive results. And if you ignore the excess resources, why then is needed and display itself? Telestandart keeps platform Spectrum, as a whole, binds all together. does not give you crawl on their individual corners. In addition, of the display is very expensive, so they cheap and worth it. Now handsets for digital communications, almost for nothing sell but due to the monthly rent (payment) is justified. What is the difference as people money to pay one-time fee when purchasing, if he then life will unfasten? Connector XS10 - a switch connector XS5. After perekommutirovaniya / processing in the stub / board inserted in the XS10, All signals must still return a fee and go on XS5. At the same connector XS5 only 7 pin signals (clip not account: a cabinet ground, but not the signal). Of these 7 pin: 3 pcs.: R-G-B, 1 pc.: AUD10; 1 pc. - GND (signal), 2 pcs. - (VIDEO and SYND) or (CS and HS). Where are you from take a pin under BRIGHT? Hence, the screw-down somewhere socket, additional snot in your computer, why? Much more useful would, if users have speculated not on how to change the computer, and how apply it in the form in which it there. Any alteration / debugging / improvement of the expansion - it prepare a computer operation, and not the operation. Sadly, for many it becomes an end in itself and self-sustaining activities. 5. Unfortunately, the controller until the AT-Claudia does not start in the series. The main reason - A small number of computers with the system bus. In essence - this is one KAY'i. On the market are not so much as a percentage respect. To sell (and therefore issue), let's, focusing on rukosuystvo when connected (as opposed to simple joint, as is the case with the bus) is futile, in fact, that in reality, it is not work. but it leads to: 1) accelerated failure of the components of earlier models (Without tires), 2) the formation of secondary Market bus devices, which are very quickly knocks down the price of the new svezhevypuschennye device, making production unprofitable, because unable to keep the price. Actually, this would not be anything bad, well, to convince the person's own foolishness, well, broke my comp by their own hands. but the trouble is that old scrap PC, a new user do not buy. A this leads to a narrowing of the market for reducing the number of users. In the networks and media Spectrum'a hold the opposite point of view, just because they do not know REAL statistics. One user, MOCK SUCCESSFULLY solder device, commonly advertises its "success". While four others after breaking his car somehow keep silent. And they will say anything if broken computer, they are deprived of opportunities to go out to the network or any other way to inform about their own failure? Similarly, and in mice. Besides, now available for sale membrane keypads. It is believed that they stand in the company (c) Nemo's expensive, but the keyboard adapter is more expensive in FIVE AGAIN! Why is this nobody talking about? 6. Connect the CD ROM is possible, but probably not really necessary because the corresponding program has not yet been written. Himself IDE-controller bus is already there. E-mail program. What about the drivers situation, if you recall, we discussed at SS'000. (C) Nemo
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 21 November