Scene in dePRESSa
Why am I bringing up this topic again? Firstly, because she
^
I’m very close to it myself, and often some things just tear me apart
strings of my soul.
To begin with, I want to make a general overview of the concept(s) modern
press. In principle, newspapers/magazines now probably occupy
half of the total volume of software we produce. This is due
first of all, the state of affairs on the platform itself, its specifics.
For most Spectrumists, their platform has become a kind of
means of communication, and naturally, the press is the most
in a suitable way for this, fortunately, push the text intoshell
and now anyone can come up with a name for it.
Spectrum PRSA began to develop rapidly with the advent
networks. Newspapers came out in batches, wherever there was at least
some kind of Spectrum civilization. Now it’s clear when not
no networks (I mean the real ZX-UET, not FIDO), newspapers
are done mainly to promote their views, their groups,
logos, themselves eventually into the world, like any software on
Spectrum. It's stupid to say that someone does this for others.
As stupid as saying that sausage is made so that we
they tried it, not to make money...
Recently, the so-called Stage Press was super fashionable.
The only truly sensible scene magazine Scenergy I
I can attribute it to the stage press. But that was a DEMO scene.
Now there is not even such a concept; it is usually omitted, saying
only about the stage. It is clear that most of today's "Scenarios", including
famous personalities in the past, but far from demosceners. Demoscene
died, but the scene remained! It is also clear what to do with newspapers
much easier than the demos. If you can become a famous stage designer
by attracting the greatest, evenscandalous
attention, why hunch over the code? And now, they are already underway
reasoning about stage concepts by people who have not done their
Not a single demo in my life. God bless her, the demoscene. I admit that
The scene is not focused on demos alone. Let her be
MUS'ART'ASCII... But something must lie at the core. Creation
! And not spatial reasoning on the topic of whether women give...
It is clear that those who really do something don’t have time
endless chatter in chats and descriptions of the latest drinking sessions in
stage press...
So, something pulled me in the wrong direction. Let's return to our
sheep :)
A new trend in the press - Lamergy, is a separate topic altogether. You can
even come up with a title like... "Lamergy:dead end, or
direction" Of course, those who came up with this certainly contributed
something new. I don't know what effect they were hoping for, but
there was an effect. As if someone in a room filled with gas struck
with a match.
Now, of course, there has been no such excitement for a long time. However, it's not worth it
bury him. Any path, if you only follow it straight, is too early
or it will end in a dead end later. And so that this doesn't happen,
constant search is needed.
Lamergy is a good way to just relax. And she has her niche
already taken. And what follows after him appears a bunch of completely
immoral similarities, it’s all bullshit... There are always idiots
enough!
Also, concluding the conversation about the press, I cannot help but mention this
topic:
Since the days of the Optocoupler, a feature called “convoy” has come into fashion.
(review, review) software. And the reaction, as I remember, to this matter was
different. No, it's certainly not bad when it's right
use. But often such reviews become a stone
stumbling blocks in relations between teams.Trouble
is that many "observers" usually turn
review in a frank "obser". Or simply ignoring tastes and
the reader's preferences brazenly write their own, unsolicited
review, considering your opinion exclusively authoritative. Example
out of my head:
----------------------------------------------------------------
don news #15
(c) OHG
Complete nonsense
[SKIPus FOXus]
....
ZXTime #5
(c) KCS
Super newspaper. Very often there are good reviews about us.
Therefore, we strongly advise you to read...
----------------------------------------------------------------
I think you recognize the BODY style.
Of course I understand that ZX-Time is a good newspaper, despite
nuances that everyone has. But she's good not because
writes flattering reviews for BODY. And they are not flattering at all. A
honored. BODY is also good. At least for your style and
productivity. But even if they didn’t like DOU UEWS, they didn’t
It’s worth brazenly announcing this to everyone. It's one thing to orient
reader in software, and another thing is to discourage him from seeing thissoftware
And so there is little of it left. Let's be a little tolerant of each other
friend!
Damn, Fox, since when did you start writing what I'm on
1OO% agree? There's not even anything to comment on ;)
Why am I bringing up this topic again? Firstly, because she ^ I’m very close to it myself, and often some things just tear me apart strings of my soul. To begin with, I want to make a general overview of the concept(s) modern press. In principle, newspapers/magazines now probably occupy half of the total volume of software we produce. This is due first of all, the state of affairs on the platform itself, its specifics. For most Spectrumists, their platform has become a kind of means of communication, and naturally, the press is the most in a suitable way for this, fortunately, push the text intoshell and now anyone can come up with a name for it. Spectrum PRSA began to develop rapidly with the advent networks. Newspapers came out in batches, wherever there was at least some kind of Spectrum civilization. Now it’s clear when not no networks (I mean the real ZX-UET, not FIDO), newspapers are done mainly to promote their views, their groups, logos, themselves eventually into the world, like any software on Spectrum. It's stupid to say that someone does this for others. As stupid as saying that sausage is made so that we they tried it, not to make money... Recently, the so-called Stage Press was super fashionable. The only truly sensible scene magazine Scenergy I I can attribute it to the stage press. But that was a DEMO scene. Now there is not even such a concept; it is usually omitted, saying only about the stage. It is clear that most of today's "Scenarios", including famous personalities in the past, but far from demosceners. Demoscene died, but the scene remained! It is also clear what to do with newspapers much easier than the demos. If you can become a famous stage designer by attracting the greatest, evenscandalous attention, why hunch over the code? And now, they are already underway reasoning about stage concepts by people who have not done their Not a single demo in my life. God bless her, the demoscene. I admit that The scene is not focused on demos alone. Let her be MUS'ART'ASCII... But something must lie at the core. Creation ! And not spatial reasoning on the topic of whether women give...
It is clear that those who really do something don’t have time endless chatter in chats and descriptions of the latest drinking sessions in stage press... So, something pulled me in the wrong direction. Let's return to our sheep :) A new trend in the press - Lamergy, is a separate topic altogether. You can even come up with a title like... "Lamergy:dead end, or direction" Of course, those who came up with this certainly contributed something new. I don't know what effect they were hoping for, but there was an effect. As if someone in a room filled with gas struck with a match. Now, of course, there has been no such excitement for a long time. However, it's not worth it bury him. Any path, if you only follow it straight, is too early or it will end in a dead end later. And so that this doesn't happen, constant search is needed. Lamergy is a good way to just relax. And she has her niche already taken. And what follows after him appears a bunch of completely immoral similarities, it’s all bullshit... There are always idiots enough! Also, concluding the conversation about the press, I cannot help but mention this topic: Since the days of the Optocoupler, a feature called “convoy” has come into fashion. (review, review) software. And the reaction, as I remember, to this matter was different. No, it's certainly not bad when it's right use. But often such reviews become a stone stumbling blocks in relations between teams.Trouble is that many "observers" usually turn review in a frank "obser". Or simply ignoring tastes and the reader's preferences brazenly write their own, unsolicited review, considering your opinion exclusively authoritative. Example out of my head: ---------------------------------------------------------------- don news #15 (c) OHG Complete nonsense [SKIPus FOXus] .... ZXTime #5 (c) KCS Super newspaper. Very often there are good reviews about us. Therefore, we strongly advise you to read... ---------------------------------------------------------------- I think you recognize the BODY style. Of course I understand that ZX-Time is a good newspaper, despite nuances that everyone has. But she's good not because writes flattering reviews for BODY. And they are not flattering at all. A honored. BODY is also good. At least for your style and productivity. But even if they didn’t like DOU UEWS, they didn’t It’s worth brazenly announcing this to everyone. It's one thing to orient reader in software, and another thing is to discourage him from seeing thissoftware And so there is little of it left. Let's be a little tolerant of each other friend!
Damn, Fox, since when did you start writing what I'm on 1OO% agree? There's not even anything to comment on ;)
Share your thoughts about the article