System - Review of assemblers: ZEUS, TASM, PRIMUS, GENS4, GEMUS.

And now we are publishing the article
Kravchenko Alexey, in which
provides a brief overview of assemblers
for ZX-SPECTRUM.                
 "ZUES" or "TASM"        
                                
which assembler is better to choose
of all the variety
assemblers existing on
today?      Under
by diversity I mean
only five assemblers: "GENSCH",
"ZEUS", "TASM 128", "PRIMUS"and
"GENIUS ASSEMBLER", description
which is included in the 3rd issue
"Forum", but which I look into
I haven't seen it.                       
   "PRIMUS"I didn’t use it,
so write nothing bad about
I won’t. This article talks
will go about "GENS'e", "ZEUS'e" and
"TASM'e".                       
   "GENS"- my very first
assembler is the most inconvenient in
work - editor as in
CORVET BASIC). He has
there is only one advantage:
ability to receive text
module from object code with
using "MONS". Although on the other hand
there are programs
allowing you to translate texts from
"GENS" into other assemblers.   
   "ZEUS" - from all versions of this
assemblers walking around our
vast Motherland, the most successful
is a modified version
Kiselev Igor.  This is the seventh
the fastest one I know
assemblers, although for some reason
the fastest is "TASM".
Easy to enter and edit
text make this assembler
most suitable for
beginner programmers.      
   "TASM 3.0" -most powerful
today assemblers
for ZX-SPECTRUM. Convenient
editor, pretty fast
assembly, possibility
use all 48 memory for
object code. (assembler itself
can be located in any
memory page) - here are the main
advantages of this assembler. 
   And the disadvantages include
three things: firstly too
small print, secondly in
subroutine "INCBIN" is allowed
mistake, third mistake in
subroutine "MEGRE" .  By the way,
the error "MEGRE" has been corrected by me,
and in this issue you
a corrected one is proposed
version called "TASM
3.0+".                          
   And finally, a short overview
debugger monitors. They're not like that
too much.                     
   "MONSCH" - the most
common among 48ers
monitors.   Its advantage:
ability to broadcast a file to
"GENS".   Its disadvantages: no
understandsundocumented
commands and only supports
hexadecimal input.         
   "STS 3.3" - judging by the description
good monitor, but...  he
uses 128 modeand
switches pages via #FD
port, on computers with full
port decryption #7FFD
(SCORPION ZS-256, ATM-TURBO and
etc.) does not work.   All attempts
fix his work is over
a complete failure.                
   In my opinion, the most
a good monitor debugger is
"SHADOW SERVICE MONITOR" in
"SCORPION'e".                   
   Me, like probably many others
other users
SCORPION's  it suits
100%.  One is not enough - no
handles some
undocumented commands. K
unfortunately there are ways
disrupt its work. Currently
time work is underway
eliminating this annoying
moment.© Alexey Kravchenko      
        © 1996 HORRORSOFT       
  "Pioneer": By the way, to your
FYI, the journal is made with
using assembler "GENSCH".
Members of the editorial board have already become accustomed to
this assembler and even though he is in
is inconvenient in some way, we are unlikely to
We'll be switching soon
to other assemblers, let them
even several times more powerful than it
times.                            
   For beginning programmers, we
We advise you to start working
exactly in this assembler.  In
many books on systems
programs you most likely
you will find exactly the description "GENSCH".
                                
   And now about speed,
we had a practical way
It is established that "GENSCH"
assembles a little faster,
than "TASM".                     
   So, choose one or the other
assembler, read books on
programming in machines
codes, and if you have something
it won't work out, then
contact us for help.Гусманов Михаил        
                                
   © 1996 Череповец тг "АТЭК".  
                                
              * * *