Optron #19
02 октября 1998 |
|
FT'98: Feedback - Opinions on Fun Top'e.
Briefly about the past, information about future I. Bozhenko Introduction Despite the fact that from the date of FunTop'98's been more than a month spektrumisty our region can not yet uzat the details of only two ZX-publications: Nicron'e and Optocouplers. In addition, tenth number of the Minsk newspaper RIP posted very interesting analysis of entries. Other ZX-publication or did not manage to cover such an outstanding event, the International Festival of Computer Arts either kept silent about it, or simply have not yet reached us. Sorry. Let's start with self-esteem. Reporting in the seventeenth issue of Optron " FunTop'98 turned on is not enthusiastic. Especially emphasized the organizational flaws. No overall evaluation, no conclusions (on that and report!) However, the reasons for this approach quite clearly clear in the reporting. Publishing his edition, of course, admit that The festival can be illuminated and the other point of view. Well, the publication in Nicron'e surpassed all expectations! Thunder victory, was heard! Authors Nicron'a (they are also organizers Festival) tells us about his exploits so pathetic, enthusiastically, that it becomes quite clear: all the Ancient Greek and Roman heroes, taken together, Far from the exploits of the current organizers! FunTop himself did not and will not be unmatched in the history of mankind! As for flaws prior to the event did, then they are so insignificant that they deserve just to mention a glimpse of them, or do not remember. In short, Ispolati, Axios! Rejoice, brave Ross! AK Tolstoy A look at the predecessors It is noteworthy that when every opportunity Nicron misses possible kick organizers Enlight'97 - in the best Soviet and post-Soviet traditions. Why surprising? In Kiev, for example, every new prime minister, barely taking the "Plant" immediately announces its predecessor almost criminal. So that "spitting" in Enlight'97 - just childish prank. What about criticism? No doubt, the organizers have done a tremendous job, quite successfully cope with emerging before them imaginable and unimaginable hardship. Honor and praise them for it! But let me, however, note the following. The more significant event - the higher the requirements for the organizers! Accordingly, the more criticism of their address. From all sorts of comments can be spared but frankly the failed event. What is there to explain? And since everyone knows about com "Do not say anything but good! Organisers FunTop'a, like, totally not prepared for criticism. Judging by their enthusiastic self-esteem, we can assume that any comments will be accepted by them, like pouring mud - about the same as in ancient times ideological Front Central Committee and the appropriate management KGB reacted to the "vile slander zabugornye spiteful scribblers. " But in such a position I am afraid, fear, To Inquisition Did not carry a monk! No wonder so squalid Old algvazil Me by the hand of stout Just now threatened. Prutkov Therefore, all of the following - in no If not "attacks" on the organizers have already entered in the "annals" of the Festival - and Reflections on the problems that may Festival organizers face the future. Organizational side The overall situation in the former Soviet space will likely continue deteriorate. Therefore, the organizers of the Future Festival should be ready for the most unexpected difficulties. The experience of the FunTop'a is valuable the fact that he showed with some variety force majeure may stolkutsya organizers. Surely, from such a weak spirit could sink your hands (not only)! Should, however, be noted that in many cities (do not know how this is the case in Moscow and St. Petersburg) I get disconnected elektoseti and remote connection has long been, alas, not acts of God, but quite commonplace, I would even say, "normal" situation. Responsibility Just so no reference to "black set of circumstances and excuses such as "Papa-Mama, do not start", "no one to leave a child" - can not be taken into account. "In Russia, no one is responsible for anything? (I think in Ukraine anyway?). Well, the harder (and more honor!) for the organizers. By this "slogan" to be added: "... except spektrumistov! "We do and do not owe anything? But this is alas, does not work even with matinee in kindergarten. Grasp ustroitelstvo international festival have to respond to the international spektrumistskim dzhizheniem. Taking competitive job, the organizers are accountable to its author. And they obliged to account to each author on the fate of his brainchild. And that - no matter how waved - a fact. "He did not overtake, do not bypass Vladimir Mayakovsky. Offended Whatever (and however) the event successfully did not pass - there will always be resentful and dissatisfied. It does not matter - really or their imaginary grievances, whether express claim to be better in the future, either from "zlopyhatelstva. Just for this we must be prepared and get hysterical because of the slightest claim. Contest It should be clear about - which would be take place at the Festival: a competition or blanket screening of all and sundry that the only Organizers will be able to rake? Of course, you can hold something, and more. And nobody nevozbranyaetsya evaluate all submitted work. But! Competitive and out-of-competition screenings should be conducted separately, and not to make a "salad". As long as there is a contest - would you be kind enough to provide its members the highest possible equal conditions and evaluation criteria. It is totally unacceptable to: - Some pass rush job by the appointed time, and others - pulled up to the last and handed over his work almost to the end of the contest; - Another show some work is fixed in advance, and others - at the behest of their authors - were presented to the public in the last turn (what they say about Stirlitz last impression?) - Some work after taking part in the contest went into hiding, and then presented with honorable audience reworked, and, it is disguised as shown in competition; - Once accepted rules vposlesdstviii differently interpreted, then - to adjust, and then - and does ignored. Emblem At FunTop'e a situation to avoid which I would like to wish the organizers Future Festival. Really would not like to: - Festival of characters were already four (!) logo; - Emblems of the contest was going on some sort of an incomprehensible mess - whether he was, whether not, whether he was the "official", whether "Informal", or was for him the prize, the whether he was "not allowed"; - Approval of the emblem of the Festival it participants found other things to do, and during order, and about its author - and did - after; - Author of the approved logo was not timely informed of their success. And what, in fact, the competition of posters "inferior" other competitions? But in the end, is not as important will be the emblem of a certain author or an outsider "Court painter" of the main organizer. It is important that there was a complete certainty. New Ideas After the FunTop'98 on ehokonferentsiyam was wandering a lot of new ideas. For example, Ivan Mak suggested making a special contest "digital-music", limiting the scope of the program to 4-16K. This interested many fidoshnikov. Andrew Savichev and Alexey Ivanov were discussing possible changes to the rules of the contest. Evgeny Milun explained the difference between Festival and the virtual competition. Alexander Kulik offered to introduce the concept of "Horror-Demo". "And Animation Compo!", - Supported joke Alexander Grimalovsky. And why not? In any case, Judging from the disputes that erupted around demos "Blame" and "Funtasy", long overdue idea separately evaluate the "coolness coding and "Artistic impression"! It is clear that the more competition and changes in the rules - the more the hassle organizers. But the pressing issues - the so- or otherwise - must be addressed. Preselection FunTop'98 experience has shown that pre-selection and screening of work still needed - let it not seem to someone wild and impracticable. High prestige of the Festival should not be undermine or frankly a disaster work that would hiss, no job, any public demonstration which completely unacceptable. Anonymity Let us ask ourselves the question: whether and continue suit merrymaking with the "anonymity"? Reading Nicron, we can see that the full anonymity of entries to comply with both and failed. At the same time, it is clear that the "anonymity" has created a number of difficulties for the participants. So is not it easier to opt out of this very anonymity? It is worth noting that, having pre-selection and abandoning "Anonymity", could be prepared in advance, make copies and bring to a all participants (hang on walls, and ideally - to distribute to each player) a full program (or a list of competitive works at least) of the Festival. Thus, it can it would avoid many problems. "Popular vote" In the same way as in the "Anonymous" benefit from the fact that the winners of the contest determine all those present, it seems highly doubtful. But the shortcomings such a method - are obvious. Judge for yourself. Suppose, the Organizing Committee will work out well certain evaluation criteria - but does All participants will follow them exactly, but not their own beliefs and tastes? And members of the host city (they presumably constitute the majority) - and nonresident? They that will evaluate the work exactly the same? Further, some will sit fixedly at the monitor, while others - peek out from behind his back and nape, running on a smoke break, a beer, yet somewhere. Someone will come later, someone - leave early. This is what will add objectivity overall evaluation? But let's say all of the above will not have absolutely no value. So perhaps there is not an ignorant skeptic (like I, for example), which put the objectivity of this method into question? A large number of ballots caused the delay in publishing the results? A two-week adjustment to a subsequent change in the list of winners? And now lasted a month change in the final list? Is that - little things, on what pays attention only spiteful "accuser"? Therefore, it is okay if have determined the ranking works fairly authoritative, competent and impartial Jury, verify, of course, its assessment reaction of viewers on submitted work. Moreover, the jury will see for the first time - as well as all the spectators! A "popular vote", of course, also can be done - but only for the award "Audience Choice Award." And do not immediately dismiss this proposals - as does this, for example, A. Ivanov, responding to a proposal A. Savicheva about this: "We the jury - all present - and beyond (well, just as g.Stolypin!) - So it was, so, IMHO, will be continue! " Rapid Alert Agree, not very nice getting an hour or two to languish in expectation of the announcement of the results of a hundred or so participants. All the more unseemly keep waiting a little Do not for a month all other spektrumistov. So the question of efficiency should also consider. Moreover, that the Internet available is not yet over, Fido - it is not ITAR-TASS, a ZX-press - it is not printed edition. "Hot line" between the Organizing Committee and the online newspaper - that's one of the solutions to the problem. Conclusion Thus, the organizers of the Future Festival will pile up on their shoulder the immense mountain of problems. And get to work must now, without spending time on the buildup. Success to all, and - until the next meeting Festival!
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 23 November