Insanity #10
30 ноября 2001 |
|
Sinclair v. Wintel - Creator ZX Spectrum and its new project.
... Clive Sinclair snobbery against Wintel ... $% Surv! V0r, 2oo1 Who if not us, spektrumistam, it is known that in the 1980's Clive Sinclair shocked the world with his electronic PC price less than 100 pounds sterling per-ekzempplyar. Then it was real shock. Now he shares with us his idea to make a revolution in the portable PC and thus teach a lesson to Intel. E-shop through the Internet is http://E-Bay.com sell-all-else is new, but already rare and collectible copies of the very first computers ZX Spectrum, which carefully kept nearly 20 years in someone's caring hands. Completely predictable situation that a person who in the early 80-ies, filled the personal computer market with a price of less than 100 pounds-sterling, already today bears plans for his return to the world stage of computer producers with a new project - a personal computer for half the cost of any of its competitors. A little later, the project got its name - Spectrum 2000. Since its declaration has already passed two years. Fits the end of the year and the 2000th. In 1999 Clive Sinclair, the first publicly stated his plans in this regard, the views on this subject appeared on the Internet. His idea, in principle, is responsible desires of any potential consumer computers cheap goods! But every other computer maker does not may be incompetent in this sensitive to their fate question. He understood that processor manufacturers in pursuit of power its silicon advances do not allow users to to master the information previously provided architecture. Megahertz been replaced by gigahertz, but the program each year require more resources, although a more thoughtful approach to their establishment, they would be able to operate on less powerful equipment, and would cost an order of magnitude smaller. Is extensive path of development of computers and someday he himself will lead to deadlock. On the way to solve this problem is a problem called Wintel: a tough bunch of software companies - Microsoft and the microprocessor - Intel. As a result of their cooperation until recently it was almost impossible submit a PC without an operating system other than to Windows. Lawsuit against Microsoft's monopoly in the world software provided an opportunity to market new name, and now the computer is not always associated with trademark of Microsoft. The emergence of Linux as a competitor to Windows and the rapid development of this operating system, as well as the emergence of competing railroads Intel, forced Sinclair to ponder the question that needs of customers still are not always satisfied. That is to say it in just means that demand does not gives rise to a proposal that society needs. Still, Intel and Microsoft continue to dominate the market computer technology, but it is tempting to think will not last as long as competitors are breathing them in the neck and even on some positions can come out ahead. Nevertheless, mass computer is still based on the architecture, the proposed Intel, in order to overcome the monopoly drawback is absolutely required an unconventional approach. On this score Sinclair suggested an interesting idea - 'If Linux operating system was able to reverse situation in the operating system market, there must be something is capable to do the same, but the market itself computers. If the result is the same, why pay more for the same Windows, if you can get almost for free Linux? '. Same story with the iron. Microsoft initially worked for architecture from Intel, then While the Linux source code open to everyone and fundamentally perhaps the entire Linux system to move under any hardware, any computer architecture. It would not require such substantial investment, while, as if it took on the Spectrum porting Windows. For Linux, it does not matter which processor is installed in the car, at the while for Windows it is always important presence of the component compatible with Intel, which means every day you want more more processor speed, more rapid memory, the new devices. Spiral upward to infinity up. Therefore, if we talk about the new Spectrum'e, then appropriate to speak about LINUX. But the inventor warns against the idea that Linux is bound to be used in its development. This is one of the contenders for his place. Sinclair's idea is based on its latest development, which was released back in 1988. Computer Z88 is not reached sales levels of their predecessors in the family of Z, but inventor did not abandon his ideas. He understood the main cause of its failure - the use of non-standard display in the computer. Then the technology was not sufficiently developed that imposed restrictions on the establishment of a full-fledged product. Now, according to Sinclair, there comes a time when the idea Z88 may return in the guise of modern technology, even with the LCD. As part of this thesis, the conversation about the operating system is very important, because it is one of the essential parts of the project. Sinclair eagerly hunting for a solution, which in its opinion must necessarily exist. How, then, will actually do something that will work is not worse than anything else and at the same cost twice less? Let us not doubt the knowledge Sinclair, his experience allows him to make judgments about what is real exercise, but that there is no '. Few people are aware that when the Sinclair ZX80 and made his ZX81, so a surge of interest around the lottery game machines, which was created by the public, in fact, he struck the first blow to the nascent empire PC. This gave time for the emergence of special kinds of people, faced one on one with the temperamental stuffing 16-kilobyte ROM. Of them came out today System programmers, the creators of computer games and internet portals. Low-budget computer pushed the date of birth PC. What he famous! Is it possible the second coming, twenty years later? Sinclair's opinion on today's market of computer technologies stops at the most basic of modern things, the production which reached its perfection and not so expensive 15 years ago. Formula of the computer alternative Wintel architecture can be expressed in a simple listing of those merits, in search of the most successful combination which work every day thousands of minds: a suitable operating system, Cheap and high quality display, powerful microprocessor. Like any other their device, Sinclair plans distribute computer using the regular mail. He does this for over twenty years since the inception of Micro-ZX80, to Z-bike and a miniature radio. His inventions form a market, not requiring the army of agents for the sale of PC-devices, which exists in the world. Therefore, Wintel and costs such a fortune. They have no choice just like to resell the purchased, a profit and re-buy to sell. Vicious circle. Intel keeps its customers on their toes, regularly run campaigns for the advertising of their very expensive processors. But shame them for what they sell their goods at high prices would be just silly. Works here Act - do not want, do not take it. Criticism but should be subjected to one of the technical making, which is currently used. Processor and computer memory are connected by wires, they originally conceived as two devices, which, however, in You can always be replaced - to put a new, more powerful processor, or another line of memory. However, it would much better, according to Sinclair, if memory and the processor placed in a computer under one 'roof', ie create a single device, a chip that is said on one crystals. In this case, your computer's performance will be depend only on your financial capabilities. Will realistic at any time to add not only an additional processor computer, but also memory, which will be designed for him. And all of this - a single monolithic chip. The idea is interesting enough. But we can not naively assume that Intel does not possess such information. The company produces multiprocessor device, but they are focused exclusively on the corporate level. Servers are not yet available to a wide customer, and they are not that they need. This allows the company to organize its policies so that actually manage to get a lot of money with two segments market later than losing one of them in the pursuit of uniformity. Therefore, says Sinclair, in the near future expect some new situation with these things. All yet remain in their places. But the problem can be solved, at least about her will think more seriously. And here's why. Video games is the developing trend in the computer world. Specifically for the game coming up with crazy variety of options and attributes of the game. The Pursuit for more realistic and dynamic picture and sound companies producing video game consoles are ready to go to any victims in the hope to be the first in this race. And here it would be unfair to accuse them of bias approach to solving the problem of speed and hardware software. We must remember that they are not Microsoft. Only just emerged game console Sony Playstation II. Her appearance proves that there is no limit to perfection technologies. In comparison with the computer Pentium III, the last is weak-willed giant, and Sony gives a head start on image and capabilities that their repetition on a Pentium III require additional investment in him by the buyer in half the cost of the computer itself, while as users of PS-II would not worry about the headache switching to another operating system. What happened? The answer is simple - Sony has not stuck with the policies of the consortium Wintel. First, the producers of video game consoles do not have to deduct osummy to fund the use of the operating system in its product, such as Windows. Any manufacturer of video game consoles interested to make their product more robust, quality and cheaper. And consequently, all programmanaya firmware prefix is always the result of the efforts of the most manufacturer's instructions. Secondly, like the same Sony, uses in the production of their PS-II elemental base of their intra-corporate production (at least by Japanese firms) for the same reasons that were outlined above. Without listing a penny in Wintel, Sony has achieved simply fantastic the result - it is one of the few who absolutely makes no Wintel chance to win themselves in their territory. Even a child Microsoft - game console X-Box, has all the hallmarks strain, defects which seal displayed on any PC. Comments, I think, unnecessary. That is why, Sinclair believes he still under prosperous circumstances will return to the big business. The formula of the computer is simple: the microprocessor is not less efficient than today's desytopov, but cheap, a little less memory, but fast, cheap display. Here the word 'cheap' is not synonymous with the word 'defective'. Sinclair's problem lies in the fact that on the basis of the common technology to do what others could not companies. He believes that the company certainly aware of all these ideas, but in the pursuit of profit, they are forced to enter the buyer misleading. As a result, his proposed solution, he said that he could achieve a result, when his computer would cost twice as cheaper than its counterpart on Wintel, at the same time performance will not concede to its competitor. Should once again noted that Sinclair did not want to make an analog PC with his hands, he will do as always something new to his characteristic innovative approach to solving the problem. You are here the analogy with the Amiga did not like? Certainly, interest in Clive Sinclair is not only simple idea to create a computer, but also to get some profit, inachae from an economic point of view it will simply impracticable. We just have to wait and think that after all Sinclair estimates will not remain on paper even twenty years.
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 21 November