ZX Ferrum #02
26 апреля 2004 |
|
Iron - MIDI interface for the ZX-Spectrum-compatible computers (continued).
A couple of words from me can be too late and the publication of the article (It has already been published in Paragraph # 18), but the topic is relevant, and can not all read, the more I got in touch with the author, and he promised to give more information. (C) Alex Belodvortsev MIDI interface. Continued. Greetings, spektrumisty! Once again, propose a project <MIDI interface for ZX-Spectrum-compatible computers>. Why? Because it has been repeatedly suggested. Unfortunately - to no avail. And that reaction to my proposal, which was 90% do not have the right to be called with the result. But I do not lost hope, and hope that there are still enthusiasts with heads that can think creatively and work with your hands, which . Wake up and start helping. Help not to me but, first of all, yourself and the platform that you're up to So far, no matter what, love. At this time I decided write an article in more detail and try not to miss it most important. Why would you start? Probably worth it to start with something such that once would have caused concern and attracted the attention of users Spectrum. What could it be? Probably some kind of thing which Spectrum has not yet had, but that would not have superfluous, and, most importantly, that would be useful for users of this computer. As I recall the story of Speccy in 1985 was carried out revision of its previous version - to increase the memory up to 128 kilobytes, the number of screens, and ... was added Music processor AY-3-8912 (AY-3-8910, YM2149F ... - more - ). Ie Even then, developers puzzled increase sound capabilities Speccy. For a while, indeed, this simple trehgolosy synthesizer was a godsend for spektrumistov, especially for musicians. For it were written music editors, it immediately began to use in games and just for scoring programs. Listening to music written for AY, I sometimes wondered, with a virtuosity of those who wrote this music, used by more than a modest (by today) opportunities AY. And more than once occurred to him - that they created, if you give them more advanced technical means? Progress does not stand still. Now the possibility of a small AY can indeed be regarded as modest. And all anything if Speccy is now . But! Painfully so tenacious machine. Until now, there is (from the heart I hope) many of its admirers. But time passes, and since I live Speccy, it should be improved. And it worked - for him connected to the mouse, CD-ROM, hard drive, designed modem ... Not remain unchanged and sound. One of the most famous developments in this area, in my opinion, is the General Sound (GS). Of course, the appearance of this module gives Speccy new sound possible, for example, you can write music, using real tools, loading them into memory modules. All this is good. Of course, developers have worked on conscience (To develop and debug such a device is very difficult - I know from personal experience), but immediately ran into his eyes excessively high complexity of the scheme, it would be greatly simplified. Also, in my opinion, very unfortunate choice of the central processor, which also works to limit their opportunities - at the cutoff frequency. Wiser, I think, have been used in this scheme, single-chip computer i8031, i8051 or their domestic counterparts (VE31, VE51) - while they were already available and cost hardly more than Z80. I think that the 8051 with its powerful assembly language, high performance, ability to address 64kb of RAM + 64KB ROM and the ability to easily operate at frequencies up to 25 MHz would be more appropriate. However, I will not delve into an analysis of this scheme, because is not is the purpose of my article. In general, I decided to make my own <the sound card>. There were two options: 1. To develop something similar to GS. 2. Use a commercial sound card. The first option I immediately threw away - not worth powder and shot. All the same, using available element base (eg, K572PA1) decent sound quality can not be achieved. And too much fuss. The second option suited me more. But then again, too Many problems occur when trying to connect the voice board industrial production. And it's not the number of wires and additional chips. The problem is that the sound card There are many varieties and each its own characteristics, starting with the initialization of the ports and beyond. In this case the way out could be to use family of cards that would have the same connection method and the same communication protocol for the actual management. Soon after this variant was found. In my opinion, it would be wise to use the so-called . In order to make such a sound card to do the following: 1. Submit it to the supply voltage (+5 V, +12 V, -12 V); 2. Form a signal <Reset>; 3. Connect to the outputs of left and right channel amplifier; 4. Transmit via the serial port for data management card. In paragraphs 1-3 of the problems have arisen - was produced printed board on which were installed: collector> to connect the card, RC-chain for signal <reset> connectors for voltage supply and connect the amplifier. For <feeding> (transfer) data map was used one of the parallel port data lines (D0). Data transfer formed by software. At trial run everything went well - the map obediently served served my team raced out of the speakers terrible kakafoniya (since I could not wait to hear his creation, then did not feel like typing any melody. Therefore it was necessary restrict random notes <from the lantern>). But at the first trying to write a simple MIDI player, losing MIDI files I ran into a problem - not enough speed. Melody stumbling, hobbled, twitching and dragging on crutches. This occurred due to the fact that the routine transfer of bytes of serial communication takes time and processor had to wait until the last bit is not sent. Only then resumes processing the MIDI file. I had to look for ways to <unloading> processor. Best option, in my opinion, it would transfer the data to take on some hardware <lotion> - in this case, the processor would need only throw her the bytes to send and periodically asking her whether the transmission has ended. The first experiment was using the chips KR580VV51. The experiment failed because the data transfer rate MIDI port is 31.25 kbps, and VV51 was just unable to work at such a speed. The second experiment was more successful - was based on derived scheme MIDI keyboard, which was published in the journal <Radio> (N 11, 1993) A. Studnevym. Its basis - single chip computer 1816VE35 + register + latch 580IR82 ROM 573RF2. Multiplexers, used for polling the keyboard, were thrown unnecessary. Register 580IR82 was replaced by a much less 1533IR33 hungry chip. Instead ROM 573RF2 was used its foreign analog 2716. Of the lines of port, 8 were used to input data (D0-D7), one used for strobe input (Strobe) and one signaled process data (Busy). Thus, we have interface standard , albeit in a simplified form. Also been rewritten control program. The scheme works - MIDI files are normally played in real-time. Also, for the experiment was connected musical keyboard, and written a simple programm sequencer. But I still was not happy - scheme MIDI Interface was somewhat cumbersome and it was difficult to place in computer chassis. So I had to look for ways to minimize the device. Output is obvious - to use another OEVM. Fortunately, at the were already widely available chips from Microchip and Atmel. Me was chosen 20-nogovy Atmelovsky chip AT89C2051 - he had small size, almost did not require binding and, most importantly, had a built-in serial port. No sooner said than done. We quickly developed the fundamental scheme (it would be there to develop!), written by the managing program. I gave up the chain of relief. Now the map threw herself OEVM. The result was a composition scheme: the chip itself AT89C2051, a pair of capacitors 15 pF, a pair of 10 uF quartz at 6 MHz, circuit board connectors. That all, not counting the power supply. MIDI-map type used PT-202. Also, tests were carried out with the card Yamaha DB50XG. To connect all this economy to a standard parallel printer port standard Centronix. That's it. On this, my job was done and no longer resumed. To me it was not necessary, my attempts interested people in the echo-conference network FIDO ZX.SPECTRUM came to nothing. Currently, I have nothing left: any board with a microcontroller or firmware program. MIDI Card also left - for music, I use IBM and sound card Yamaha YMF-754. Terribly sorry that the idea is not supported. I'll try below what I actually proposed: 1. Equip Speccy quality and inexpensive MIDI synthesizer (Map of PT-202 or similar is now worth no more than 200 rubles. Chip AT89C2051 - no more than 60 rubles.) 2. Be able to easily transfer music songs from computer to computer - MIDI file of 30-40 kilobytes may be of considerable length musical work (no need to drag along with notes and tools themselves - in a MIDI-map stored in its own ROM volume, usually 512 KB - 4 MB); 3. Be able to introduce quality music support for games and other programs; 4. Get a binding to a standard - your musical product can be written in IBM format on a floppy disk and play for professional equipment; 5. Musicians can get based on the Speccy and inexpensive powerful enough music synthesizer with sequencer (Sequencer - this sort of thing that can memorize pressed sequence of notes with the possibility of subsequent playback and editing. An example of this - trackers); 6. Incidentally, the tracker - it will be possible to write new program music editor with many features. 7. With MIDI adapter can be controlled not only MIDI card, but any music synthesizer having MIDI input. The list goes on, but it seems to me, given examples suffice. Think, decide. Why give your Speccy <new breath>, increasing its sound capabilities? Are there any musicians on the Spectrum, it is enough <not hard-nosed> in Traditional AY, to adopt an innovation? Let's write writing, revoke all those who can actually do and interested in my offer! I have accumulated significant amount of information on MIDI, with pleasure share! In general, I await your response. Alex Belodvortsev Address for correspondence: Belodvortsev Alexei Nikolaevich, 400066, Volgograd-66, PO Box 11. e-mail: ra4aux@avtlg.ru Opinion Editor: So take a pen trials, claves and write responses to address Alexis or edition, and I will send to the author and printed in the newspaper. As Confucius said: "The worst enemy of man - is his laziness, "or another:" The worst enemy of the Spectrum - a lazy spektrumistov.
Other articles:
Similar articles:
В этот день... 21 November