So let's see what this chain of answers on the topic looks like
BLOODWICH:
┌Andrey Mogilnitsky (MAG) -> All
├─┬─Igor Krauklis -> MAG
│ │─┬──Sergej Koudriavcev -> Igor Krauklis
│ · └─ ···
│ ·
├───Sergey Novikov -> MAG
·
·
You can see that the messages are arranged in chains, i.e.
usually there is a "founder" of the thread or topic for discussion and he
can be any (in this case - MAG), the rest can
connect at any stage of the discussion (shown by dots).
Please note that the answers are not necessarily
personal (see 3rd line), moreover, this is the whole point
meaning. That is, despite the fact that the message is from Sergej Krauklis
was addressed not to MAG, but to Igor Krauklis, nevertheless he
obviously of interest for MAG, since a certain
there is a quoting level in it ;) When the message structure
begins to take the form of a ladder ;), i.e.:
├──┐
│ └──┐
│ └──┐
│
·
·
then very often this means the appearance of an empty flame or
private correspondence, which is monitored by the moderator. This is understandable, right?
how (see picture) this means a deviation from the general line
:)) Of course, many probably noticed that
flame (i.e. empty chatter) is always present. And this despite
to accusatory articles (in the same 7th RIP - I must sayeffect
was amazing ;) and stern warnings from the moderators.
However, it happens that it is precisely the flame that is interesting to many, so
how is this a way to talk about any abstract topics, you
interesting. Others are simply curious to watch mutual
visiting without interfering or separating the “fighting”, but making fun of
from both. :)
Share your thoughts about the article