Sinclairs - Knights of Zion.

 Henry once said that "history is nonsense";
                   but of course he didn't mean            
                   historical documents like the Protocols      
                   Elders of Zion.                           
                                                                
 Anton Sinclair. Car king
                                                                
Sinclair family-men were the substance of The Templar Knights`  
tradition of "militant spirituality": guarding Europe`s         
"pilgrims" in The Middle East was not an aspect of a belief these  
men practiced in many ways, that learning was something then live 
yay, build and defend.                                           
                                                                
http://ancientgreece-earlyamerica.com/html/_before_columbus.html
                                                                
   A real secret society consisting of 121 members, Zion  
Community founded by Godefroy of Bouillon in Jerusalem in 1099,   
had as its great masters Leonardo da Vinci, Victor     
Hugo, Jean Kokto. This order has just convened its Convention in   
Blois January 171981 (the previous Convention met in 1956 in
Paris).                                                        
   During this Convention in Blois, Pierre Plantard de Saint-Clair was  
elected Grand Master of the Order by 83 votes out of 92 voting in
third round of elections.                                           
   The election of this Grand Master marks a decisive stage in    
evolution of concepts and minds in the world, for all members of the Zion Community 
are "gray authorities" in the highest financial circles and 
international political or philosophical societies; over     
Moreover, Pierre Plantard is a direct descendant of the Mepobuhrckux kings from     
Dagobert II.                                                   
   Its origin is legally proven by nergamentous    
documents of the Blanca of Castile, found by Abbot Cehbep in   
his church at Pehh-le-Château in 1891                             
   These documents were sold by the priest's niece in 1961.    
Captain Ronald Stansmore and Sir Thomas Fraser were given
at Lloyds Bank Euro Limited in London.                         
                                                                
This information was published in English daily newspapers           
from January 19 to 20, 1981                                       
Previously, we established the existence of important connections between           
supposed Grand Masters of Zion in the 17th and 18th centuries. and    
European Freemasonry. This is the last regardless of Zion  
represents in some aspects a very interesting relationship for
our research.                                            
   So, these are numerous allusions to the Sinclair family - Scottish
branch of the Norman Saint-Clair de Gisors. Their lands in Rosslyn      
were only a few kilometers from the former residence   
Knights of the Temple in Scotland, and the chapel of this area, built
between 1446 and 1486 was reputed to be involved in Freemasonry and    
Order of the Rose and Cross. Moreover, a charter dated 1601
recognizes the Sinclairs as "hereditary Grand Masters of Scotland" 
Freemasonry". This is the first known specific Masonic        
document, and, according to some others, this title was granted
Sinclair family by James II, who reigned in the same era as
René of Anjou, that is, between 1437 and 1460.                   
                                                                
<...>                                                           
                                                                
   Many conclusions arise in favor of theseinferences and
our research:                                             
   1) There is an original text that formed the basis       
official version of the "Protocols". This text is not anocryphal,  
but completely genuine. He reveals neither Jewish thought nor
"international Jewish conspiracy", but rather Masonic          
organization or similar secret society, which includes in its  
the name is the word "Zion".                                          
   2) Original text on which the official version is based
"Protocols", in its expression, is neither violent,  
nor provocative. This is a program that mentions more 
extensive power, expansion of Freemasonry, suggesting       
establishing social, political and economic      
control. This                                                   
 the program can also be applied to the secret societies of the era 
Renaissance, and to the Society of the Holy Ebxapuctuu or          
organizations Andrea or Nodier.                                  
   3) The original text on which the official text is based   
version of "Protocols", fell into the hands of Sergei Nilus. This last one 
at first he did not want to use it against the Jews; on the contrary, he   
brought it to the king with the intention of discrediting the esoteric     
movement at court organized by Panus, Mr.Owl 
and other initiates. But first he changed the language to make
the document is more ardent, and thus better able to convince the king.    
When Nilus left the court, expelled by the sovereign, he left a text 
in its new condition. Thus, the "Protocols" suffered     
failure in the original goal to compromise the esoteric   
circle at court; but they served ahtucemutckomy movement,
for if Nilus's main target was Panus and Monsieur Philip,  
then we must admit that the Jews also became it.                        
   4) The official version of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", not     
being completely anocryphal, most likely, we think,    
is a reworked text. But behind these changes, as on  
nalimnseste or in some passages of the Bible, you can find traces  
original text. References to a certain king, to a pope, to       
the international Church or to Zion, probably not too much         
were useful to Nilus; therefore, he did not invent them himself, but since
they were there, and he was so ignorant, he didn’t have    
no reason to destroy them. In short, if these traces are nothing  
meaning in a Jewish context, they regain their meaning in   
context of secret societies.                                       
   However, we will see that they mainly relate to    
Zion Community.Michael Bagent, Richard Ley, Henry Lincoln.                      
Sacred Blood and Holy Grail                              

Share your thoughts about the article