ACNews #23 17 сентября 2003

Thoughts - When a child give to school, no one asked his opinion of the school curriculum. Why?

   ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■


              On the introduction of religious education

               in school curricula

... And let's introduce another lesson and consumption of 
alcoholic beverages. Is not it just inspires and unites? Or not 
so good filters brains?


When a child give to the school, no one asked his opinion of
school program. Why? Because immature people will not be able 
to evaluate the usefulness of a learning in the best case, will 
expound on this subject other people's thoughts. That's why it 
was introduced _obyazatelnoe_ education. And it is so there is 
nothing better as not only do not enter but also prohibit any 
religious propaganda Introduction to the educational program of 
any institution. 

Religion, pumped to the individual in his head since infancy, 
is incurable. It is known that people consume information on 
the principle of "I believe - I do not believe, under the 
control and close, as delivered from possession of the ability 
to think logically. Strictly speaking, the information this 
type has a nonzero content only in the presence of assess its 
reliability, with estimates in itself justified, and not 
"believe - do not believe it." However, this is a topic for 
another conversation. 

We are not blind. We see how religion gently and slowly 
injected into the school, and now - at first a slight change in 
program literature, then a slight change in program history. 
Very smoothly, is 10-15 years. Spirituality, you say? 
("Religious consciousness to help our Russia finally get on 
their feet and gain lost spirituality ... "(c) Ryazan Radio) 
What kind of spirituality can be discussed in the absence of 
individuality? herd on its purpose can not provide individual

its constituent members.

From the standpoint of the state, of course, be particularly 
useful to obedient subjects, but acquires the share of 
fanaticism, ignorance and beskulturnosti may perhaps outweigh 
the first advantage. However, it is to solve the state. When 
people close to the ROC, impose this state and its citizens of 
their opinion on the matter (of course, advantageous for the 
ROC [ca.: Who can estimate the actual amount of movable and 
immovable property ROC and the Vatican? I'm afraid you will not 
do it]), it looks natural, but certainly not entirely ethical. 
When people who are not associated with this organization, 
reproducing the same view seems to be no benefit to themselves 
- it looks or stupid, or suspicious.


Generally, the theme of descent into the different sides of the 
modern Russian Education (now under the leadership of

Minister Vladimir Filippov - perhaps not with the personal 
participation, happens, and chair Human Rights) deserves full

discussion. The same material was written as a reaction to a 
series of radio broadcasts from a studio STRC Oka (volume 
broadcasting of religious programs which is very large).




                                                        A. 
Encoder