Optron #27 08 мая 1999

Пресса

Non Possumus - Methods for the discussions.

               On the category X

{} Maksim Isaev, 1999


  At first I wrote about this in ehokonferentsii 
LVIVZXNET.GENERAL, and then by prosbe Editorial prerdelal a 
quick note. 


  No. 25, I was pleased, except for
one of his columns, which I expressly
I say laugh at the same time - were alarmed. Namely - "Category 
X". Like to ask her lead a couple of rhetorical

issues.

  Here You talk about how now
look like electronic media, and where,
In your opinion, is hell "computer"? And if the existing forces 
newspapers move beyond this "hell"? And readers are invited to 
think about it: whether we need are strictly non-computer 
electronic newspapers and magazines? Incidentally, this

could get a good discussion on
entitled "The true face of modern electronic media." I 
sincerely appeal to all support the discussion on this topic.


  It was, so to speak, lyrical introduction. Subsequent 
statements by leading dealt a fatal blow to all spektrumistam.


  Who considers himself a writer? What right does he
a judge? His story and the game shine
graphics? Never seen one. A test pen
in "Optocouplers" in a literary genre - is not
shine. He has at least something can praise?

  It is interesting turns. Man wants to
talk about new games, and as a result?
Half overlaid, half obgadil. And why? To user "scratched 
turnip" and said: A nafig me all this? " It is this attitude 
separates you from the Spectrum! 

  Note that all obgazhennye Toys -
renowned hits! And it's not mine sucked
The view from the finger - I spent a small survey in ZXNet, and 
most respondents believed discussed in | 25 game hit! 

  I believe that readers should be given information, and 
accurate, and not just grumble about another failed game. Also, 
do not forget so to indicate that the authors of toys and how

should they write. Andrew Stegnitsky very
well said: "Unable to create custom-made, you must feel it."



       Methods for conducting discussions

{} Tertius Gaudens


  The debate, which began in Pilot'e | 30, was
continue not only in "Optocouplers" | 26, but
in the Born Dead | 7.

  The author of the material, S. Moskalev, evaluates
the current state of software market in terms
view of "an unsophisticated user.

  Speccy, - he says - a platform
enthusiasts, but also the material side
means something. At the same time spektrumisty
alienate themselves from a potential
User: almost all system programs are calculated only on the 
encoder, no major educational programs. But on

Speccy to entice users, who use it not because of aesthetic and 
moral interests, but from a purely practical. Otherwise Speccy 
not last long. 

  It is therefore proposed to invest in
Speccy propaganda by television and print media. (I wonder why? 
"Even in my homeland ZX-press spektrumisty not able to organize 
more or less decent propaganda campaign!)


  In short, the article as an article. More interesting 
editorial comment to her: "This is close to chronic paranoid 
ravings fans Speccy type A. Savicheva. 

  It turns out, for sin must Savicheva
pay another person, and along with
him - and all of the older generation spektrumistov?

  If I Khoi-what "little idea" of those that
Savichev now throws spektrumistam,
seem ungodly medical benefits delirium, it is - my
problems, rather than Savicheva. And if
unbearable to express their opposition publicly, then it must 
be able to: 

  - To present those ideas with which you do not
agrees (as it is sometimes difficult though);

  - Arguments to refute (as
this is done, for example, T. Gorshin in "Optocouplers"
| 26);

  - And only then - to give them their
estimate (to the extent of abilities - by refraining from 
profanity and direct insults). 

  "Send fuck'i" - this is typical of the sectarian reaction to 
real, anticipated or imagined "apostates." Let them 
spektrumisty decide who they are: members a powerful mass 
movement - or pathetic sectarians.