ZX-Review

Вы уже видели ZX-Ревю 5+6 '97? Уже лучше, да? По сравнению с 3+4 - явный
прогресс. Появилась графика и музыка. Ламерских статей не замечено... Одним
словом, уже можно жить. (Может быть когда-нибудь будет с Scenergy конкурировать?
;)))

Вот, взгляните на менюшку:

source file name : REVIEW.ARJ
original size : 3258 (4Kb)
created on : 19-Dec-97 18:18:18
encoded on : 19-Dec-97 18:18:19
approximate encoded size : 5Kb
number of sections : 1
lines per section : 73

section 1 of file review.arj < uuencode by Dos Navigator >

filetime 596873805
begin 644 review.arj

``
end
sum -r/size 25394/4591 section (from "begin" to "end")
sum -r/size 53804/3258 entire input file

crc64 e5ccae3417673702 section (from "begin" to "end")
crc64 1aa0fd5497b58268 entire input file

... Now I lay me down to sleep, I pray the Lord my Soul to keep.

Fri Dec 19 1997 18:40, Sergei Novikov wrote to All:

SN> Have you already seen the ZX-Review 5+6 '97? Better now, right? Compared to 3+4 -
SN> there is clear progress. Graphics and music appeared. No lame articles
SN> have been noticed... In a word, you can already live. (Maybe someday
SN> will compete with Scenergy? ;)))

Yes, but 7-8-9-10 is even better, but at 11-12 they didn’t even make an introductory picture. And their music is pretty good. Actually, I don’t think it’s worth talking about
competition, since the Review, despite its changed appearance, surpasses all half-demo magazines with a minimum of information in terms of information content.

Kuzma

> SN> Have you already seen the ZX-Review 5+6 '97? Better now, right? Compared to 3+4 -
> SN> there is clear progress. Graphics and music appeared. No lame articles
SN> have been noticed... In a word, you can already live. (Maybe someday
> SN> will compete with Scenergy? ;)))
>
> Yes, but 7-8-9-10 is even better, but at 11-12 they didn’t even make an introductory picture. And their music is pretty good. Actually, I don’t think it’s worth talking about
competition, since the Review, despite its changed
look, in terms of information content, surpasses all half-demo magazines with a minimum of information.

KP> Yes, but 7-8-9-10 is even better, but at 11-12 they didn’t even make an introductory picture
KP>. And their music is pretty good.

Well, the music everywhere is pretty good, but in some magazines it’s simply best.

KP> Actually, I don’t think it’s worth talking about competition, because
KP> The review, despite its changed appearance, beats
KP> all half-demo magazines with a minimum information.

Well... Who cares. In principle, the uncertainty of their information is not high - there is nothing sensational or particularly important. And the design is generally prehistoric - it's disgusting to read. Everything is in one color - it’s difficult to highlight the main points for reading - you have to flip through it in a scary way. No pictures, no illustrations in the text. But
at least you can write the text to disk yourself (this, of course, rules).

With God's blessing, Sergei Novikov AKA Spirit/STEP

ZxNet: 095/100.99, FidoNet: 2:5020/689.1, InterNet: reviv...@chat.ru
Phone: (095) 952-46-19 [16.00-18.00]

VP> this is where they will bury you :(

Yes, and how will they bury me? I now have access to almost all
Russian publications, except perhaps behind the scenes, and I, honestly, stopped liking
the appendix that moves from magazine to magazine ("and from one to all melody..." about
our pop music). What, pray tell, can the Format give? Disputes about the Amiga, plus
all sorts of activities on preparing new programmers, I'm sorry, but after
Inforcom it's not worth talking about this topic. Besides, everyone somehow talks about the same
topic, there is practically no variety, but the shells... But we are going to criticize the new look of the Review, but nevertheless there are no cool shells and bells and whistles, but you,
excuse me, why are you writing out a bunch of graphics scanned from IBM/Amiga and a multiplying
arrow? I, for example, have interesting information? I’m writing it out.
And to the Formatovtsam - sorry, I just came across it, it’s not important.
I will gladly change my opinion if I am given such an opportunity. In general, I’m glad to see the emergence of new provincial magazines, they don’t have big names yet, but they can give a head start. "giants" in terms of information content.

Kuzma

Regards,
Random
--
Lord of Chaos.
e-mail: ran...@cybermail.net

Concern Chaos WWW HQ: http://www.cybermail.net/~random/

KP> Yeah, and how will they bury me? I now have access to almost all Russian publications, except for the behind-the-scenes ones, and I, honestly,
KP> stopped liking the supplement that moves from magazine to magazine ("and with
KP> the same melody for all..." about our pop music). What, pray tell, can
KP> give? Disputes about the Amiga, plus all sorts of activities to prepare
KP> new programmers, forgive me, but after Inforcom it’s not worth talking about this topic
KP>. In addition, everyone somehow talks about the same topic, there is practically no diversity
KP>, but the shell... But we are going to criticize the new
KP> look of the Revue, but nevertheless there are no cool shells and bells and whistles there, but you,
KP> forgive me, what are you writing out? A bunch of graphics scanned from IBM/Amiga and a multiplying arrow? For example, I’m writing out interesting information
KP>.
KP> And to the format people - sorry, it just came to hand, it’s not
KP> fundamentally.

What else can a person say who still says IBM and
SCANNED graphics? (equivalently - walking in his pants).

KP> I will gladly change my mind if I am given such
KP> an opportunity. In general, I am pleased with the emergence of new provincial magazines,
KP> they do not yet havebig names, but they can give a head start to the “giants” in terms of
KP> information content.

It’s better to learn a little terms.

Good Luck...

... C:\DOS\SYSTEM\OS2\UTILITIES\DOCS\HELP\WHERE\THE\F$#%\AM\I???

KP> Well, how will they bury me? I now have access to almost all publications in Russia, except perhaps behind the scenes, and I, honestly,
KP> stopped liking the supplement that moves from magazine to magazine ("and with the same
KP> melody for all..." about our pop music). What, pray tell, can
KP> format give? Disputes about the Amiga, plus all sorts of training sessions
KP> for new programmers, sorry, but after Inforcom it’s not worth talking about this topic
KP>. In addition, everyone somehow talks about the same topic, there is practically no diversity
KP>, but the shell... But we are going to criticize the new look of the
KP> Review, and yet there are no cool shells and bells and whistles there, but, excuse me,
KP> what are you writing out? A bunch of graphics scanned from IBM/Amiga and a multiplying
KP> arrow? For example, I’m writing out interesting information. A
KP> Formatovtsam - sorry, I just got caught, it’s not important.
KP> I will gladly change my mind if I am given
KP> such an opportunity. In general, I am pleased with the emergence of new provincial
KP> magazines; they do not yet have big names, but they can give a head start to
KP> “giants” in terms of information content.

The fact is that due to the unclear interface and the complete absence
of any design, layout, even the most interestingarticles are lost among
mountains of garbage. At least the main thoughts were highlighted in a different color. The magazine was made somehow carelessly: they summarized a mountain of letters, typed them and scattered them into categories. And look.
If only they had some kind of table of contents...

Wed Dec 24 1997 14:04, Sergei Novikov wrote to Kuzma Pheskov:

SN> The fact is that due to the unclear interface and the complete
SN> absence of any design or layout, even the most interesting
SN> articles are lost among a mountain of garbage. At least the main thoughts were highlighted
SN> in a different color. The magazine was made somehow carelessly: they summarized a mountain of
SN> letters, typed them and scattered them into categories. And search. At least they had a table of contents
SN>...

But that’s not what I was talking about. Of course, it is necessary to highlight everything and focus the reader's attention on what is important, but why do this to such an extent when everything is spinning, spinning, and other effects? Everything is good in moderation.

Kuzma

Wed Dec 24 1997 09:42, Max Romanoff wrote to Kuzma Pheskov:

KP>> and a multiplying arrow? For example, I’m writing out interesting information
KP>>. And to the format people - sorry, they just happened to fall into place,
KP>> this is not fundamental.

MR> What else can a person say who still says IBM and
MR> SCAINED graphics? (equivalently - walking in his pants).

Well, I can say a lot, but I won’t, why stoop to “smart” people
like you, who write about something of their own, incomprehensible. Why did the highlighted words
not illuminate you?

KP>> I will gladly change my mind if I am given
KP>> such an opportunity. In general, I’m glad to see the emergence of new
KP>> provincial magazines; they don’t have big names yet, but
KP>> can give a head start to the “giants” in terms of information content.

MR> it’s better to learn a little about the terms.

What do you mean? In general, I like attacks on people who don’t understand what they’re talking about, you’re apparently too smart of a person, an interesting tactic - you threw out a proposal of near-obscure
content, but nothing about anything and it seems smart. I’ll give you another hint - “Yes, all this is bullshit”, “I think so too”, “And here you are wrong.” Comments are equivalent to yours.

Kuzma

KP> Well, I can say a lot, but I won’t, why stoop to “smart”
KP> people like you, who write about something of their own, incomprehensible. Why didn't the highlighted words illuminate you?

Think for yourself. And don’t just make a blizzard about the “smart ones.” You are nobody.

KP> What do you mean? In general, I like attacks that I don’t understand what you’re talking about

That’s what I mean, that it’s not appropriate to call any graphics translated from
other platforms - scanned, and any PC-compatible - IBM

this is a kindergarten.

Good Luck...

... Turn of the telly, you know it's bad for your eyes.

Wed Dec 31 1997 00:42, Max Romanoff wrote to Kuzma Pheskov:

MR> Think for yourself. And don’t just make a blizzard about the “smart ones.” You are nobody.

Well, apparently I offended you in some way - I'm sorry. I can’t understand why? Why such rude words, immediately insults? What did you mean "nobody"? I,
for example, am a teacher. classes, and, I will say without false modesty, not bad. Although
maybe you meant Spectrum? Well, of course I’m not Vyacheslav Mednonogov or Stalker,
but, I dare to assure you, I’ve achieved a lot. I have quite a large number of
my own original developments, I have a column in the electronic
Specchi magazine behind me, after all, it’s worth paying attention to.
So let’s stop there and not spoil each other’s
mood with useless abuse.

I have been noticing your method of avoiding the topic for a long time - and jumping from
topics to personalities and back does not add to your authority.

A typical abstract example: I say “My red car drives faster than Ivan’s car, because it has a more powerful engine “
Your answer (MR)” The engine is lame, I should say engine, it feels like I’m in a pioneer camp. Besides, Ivan’s car is _blue_, so we have nothing to talk about, since you’re a brake
go play in the sandbox and learn to talk. "

Sincerely Yours. RkS
-- GoldED 3.00.Beta2+

RK> Listen, Max, didn’t they tell you in St. Petersburg that such a lack of communication is very annoying.

I didn’t start it -> back off.

RK> I have long noticed your method of avoiding the topic - and jumping from
RK> topics to personalities and back does not add authority to you.

I started with this, sorry. Maybe someone wanted to change the topic, but
it was at the beginning.

RK> A typical abstract example: I say “My red car drives
RK> faster than Ivan’s car, because it has a more powerful engine “
RK> Your answer (MR) "The engine is lame, you should say engine,
RK> such
RK> the impression is as if I were in a pioneer camp. Besides, Ivan
RK> has a car-
RK> on _blue_, so we have nothing to talk about talk, because you
RK> brake
RK> go play in the sandbox and learn to talk. "

this is called insanity. anisyai? You gave a rotten example.

Good Luck...

... Disinformation is not as good as datinformation.