ZF6

ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»

From Artem Haritonov To All 18 September 1997


HeYa, Roman!

Wednesday September 17 1997 20:45, Roman Kontsevoy wrote to Sergei Novikov:

RK> To All: People! Where does this crazy passion for all sorts of trackerams come from?
RK> Each group strives to release its own. In reality, music
RK> editors are practically unpopular and are needed only by musicians,
RK> of whom there are not many. Where is at least one new graphic editor?

The problem is that a graphic editor is needed only because. All the same
more or less major things are drawn not on the Spectrum - it’s difficult (judging by DR).
You still can’t write a normal editor, you can’t fall short of the Amiga/PC in this regard... And without counting music - there’s nowhere to write it qualitatively except on the Spectrum,
hence the conclusion (I don’t mean digital music, this is for speccy in general, IMHO,
perversion).

cYa, aRTY/dR! · · ··· Email: Ar...@telecom.nov.ru · · ···


From Artem Haritonov To All 22 September 1997


HeYa, Roman!

Saturday September 20 1997 20:27, Roman Kontsevoy wrote to Artem Kharitonov:

AH>> The problem is that a graphics editor is needed only insofar as.
AH>> Still, more or less major things are not drawn on the Spectrum - this is
AH>> difficult (judging by DR). You still can’t write a proper editor, until
AH>> Amiga/PC in

RK> Bring the Art Studio to mind? Even if you draw on Ammy/Pc, all the same
RK> then
RK> the graphics are finalized on the Spectrum. And it’s more convenient to draw small sprites -
RK>. Just improve the interface, add work with sprites, etc.

This is superfluous... There is practically no need for changes after Amiga/Pc.

AH>> this plan cannot be followed... And there is no music - of high quality except
AH>> Spectrum
AH>> there is nowhere to write it, hence the conclusion

RK> Well, what, there aren’t enough existing ones? Just for fun: how much
RK> time does it take to write a new editor? Is it worth it?

There is no normal editor (meeting all the requirements of a musician) and there never will be.
But it’s worth writing.

RK> Sincerely Yours RkS

cYa, aARTY/dR! · · ··· Email: Ar...@telecom.nov.ru · · ···


From Vladimir Kacev To All 28 September 1997


Hello Artem!

18 Sep 97 22:18, Artem Kharitonov wrote to Roman Kontsevoy:

AH> The problem is that a graphic editor is needed only because.
AH> Still, more or less major things are not drawn on the spectrum - this is
AH> difficult (judging by DR). You still can’t write a normal editor, until
AH> Amiga/PC in this regard is not enough... And the lack of music is of high quality
AH> except for the spectrum, there is nowhere to write it, hence the conclusion (I don’t mean digital music, this is for speccy in general, IMHO, perverted).

And ours decided to answer this subject musician from the group "Coders' Academy":


=== Cut ===

Yes, the digital reality graphics are cool, I’m just a bit off it, but only from hand
work. And about the fact that in terms of gfx editors Specky can’t reach the PC and Amiga, you are
also
right. About a new gfix editor needs to be made. y and about music... digital you are so
in vain.
and covox/soundrive it’s still nothing. At least everyone to whom I played my music
written on DIGITAL STUDIO covox cracked by Alex(???) did not notice any special
differences between the real sound and covox. And this is with my lousy
technical equipment (in the sense of speakers and amplifiers - a complete wreck ;( .
Although, who knows; some like it, but some don’t really.
y and about your phrase about music that “there’s nowhere to write it qualitatively other than the spectrum" - thisThis is also a very controversial issue.

P.S. If you want, we can bet on the score ^^^^^^^^^^^ ;-)


With best wishes LEO\CODERS' ACADEMY/TAGANROG

=== Cut ===


Bye , Vladimir :)

... ...Hey, you'll be in Taganrog, come in !...