SuperSpectrum - CRAP !!!
ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»
Hello!
> And don’t start a flame like “ZX _BETTER_ pussies”!!! I myself also sat on the Specky
> and coded too... The car is good. But it’s good in its weight category.
> And to compare it with the PC is insanity...
And they told me that I’m the insanity ;)
> And the ZX for the average user is DEAD... The foreign companies that fought
> toys and ALL have disappeared... there is no more SPECKI for the ordinary lamer... all that remains is the skeleton of toys
> foreign ones, a bunch of demomakers and Copperlegs with with his Black Raven...
> So EVERYTHING IS ON PC...
> 1. PC is the most common composter (I don’t know here, but in the whole world
> EXACTLY)
> 2. PC has an open architecture. Upgrade it like two fingers on the asphalt...
> 3. On the PC _HRENOVA_TUCHISCHA_ software !!!
UNDISPUTABLE!!!
> Draw your own conclusions... And don’t bother with foolishness - create superspectrums,
> which will approach the price of a pussy, but in fact will remain calculators
> in comparison with it. I understand that envy bites some Spekkovites in the ass
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I think you're right. This is the main source of their inexplicable anger towards
PCUsers. And why do you, gentlemen Sinclairists, consider yourself to be the coolest of all just because you know how to code in wild assembler? How about
hackprovider, or should I register the program? Or is this also lame and an unworthy occupation? And finally - you don’t know anything except that you don’t know how to create wild games on wild computers and bark angrily at the PC. Oh,
no, you also know how to make
plans, like Hitler.
> and they spread the flame “PC is crap,” but think soberly - PC is still RULES and
> a more useful car will not appear soon. We don’t take AMMI into account, because AMMI has not yet spread...
>
> So, lads... I’m waiting for complaints, reviews and suggestions... :)
You will receive a bunch of complaints. And you will find out that you are a pussy lamer - believe me ;)
> Victor Bilyk
> [UnreaL GrouP]
--
Regards, Starwalker
Marat Fayzullin wrote:
> Listen, Starwalker, I'm a man in prison, neither PCyam, nor
> Spectrum maniakal'nogo pristrastiya not pitayu, no explain to me:
> kakogo xrena Vam ot lyudei nado? If someone likes Spectrum - it's an ego personal matter. If you suddenly like "hacked'
> provider or can not register' program - it's your personal
> business, rather than your FBI. No chego Vy k lyudyam to vyazhetes'? V shkole
> Vas b'yut chtoli, ili roditeli obizhayut?
Dear Marat !
I do not study at school because I have already learned. They didn't know me there, believe me. As for sticking with people, I just asked them if it wasn't wrong for them to go full circle and throw themselves out of progress. But they reacted very painfully, which amused me, and
then started to drive off. I will not tolerate raids. Well, about the FBI I can say one thing - the FBI is far from me, and they do not need me. They have and without me
things are full.
--
Regards, Starwalker
Hello Roman Petrov! In a message of 24 Jun 97 Roman Petrov wrote to Starwalker:
[killed]
RP> cooler than Specky (about PC - meaning today's level),
RP> but I'm very interested, is it possible to do something like on XT
RP> Vibrations (2nd place at Enlight'96)??? For its processor and its
RP> hardware, Specky is a very powerful computer. Maybe I'm wrong, but it's somewhat
RP> similar to
RP> Amiga.
No, it doesn't look like an Amiga (everything is done by the processor, just like the XT). Rather, the architecture of the Spectrum is ideal for cars of its class! Amiga is a different class.
Sincerely, Alex from FFC COMPUTERS.
Hello Roman,
In a message dated 24 Jun 97 you wrote to Starwalker :
RP> "PC & AMIGA - SUXX & MUSTDIE". No one denies that both of these computers
Well, why is it so, idiots and shouting - mostly the second one.
RP> Maybe I’m wrong, but it’s somewhat similar to the Amiga.
Unfortunately (or maybe not), you’re wrong, it’s the Spectrum
that is closest to the PC in architecture and processor. Although there was a
QL - on the MC68008, it was closer to the Amiga. But unfortunately the stupid idea with microdrives and something else ruined the whole thing. If Sir Sinclair had been more far-sighted, everyone would have been on Super Spectrums
and not on x86s and Amigas. Although maybe this is for the better.
With respect. Max.
RP>> Specky's hardware is a very powerful computer. Maybe I'm wrong, but
RP>> it's something akin to an Amiga.
AL> No, it doesn't look like an Amiga (everything is done by the processor, just like the XT).
AL> Rather, the Spectrum architecture is ideal for machines of its class! Amiga
AL> another class.
This is approximately what was meant. In general, I said that just like the Amiga, with a low processor power, it produces things that are sometimes difficult for even writers to write.
With respect, Roman.