Sabotage
ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»
Glad I found you alive, Max!!!
However, on 28 Sep 97 you wrote something addressed to John Stunner:
MR> Yes, that means you read them, and ignored them, since you are writing from an alias. And after
MR> focusing attention on this - you continue again... This is -
MR> an evil violation...
Are you, grandpa, the moderator here? No!? Why am I arguing with you here... I wrote from the original handle - neither the moderator nor any of the moderators pointed out this immeasurable violation. And who here suffers from the fact that I write from the handle...
MR> P.S. Well, I came here, you know why... And I can be said to be no longer here
MR> But for you to live here... you can say..
Yes, anywhere, as long as you weren’t there... :)
With best wishes, John.
===> #/FUCK/# *mUlTiMeDiA*, #/MAKE/# more $dEmOs$ ===>
John is that you?
...why were you telling me about Sabotage?
JS> You've already read it. By the way, there is also something about offensive behavior towards
JS> subscribers in the rules...
MR> Yes, that means you read them and ignored them, since you are writing from an alias. And
MR> after focusing attention on this, you continue again... This
MR> is an evil violation...
Leave the moderating to the moderator/commodators. All moderation issues
are resolved by netmail.
Regarding the real name: the person writing from 2:5030/221.24 has the name John Stunner in the pointlist
. For me this is enough to perceive the name as
real. Until the moderator says otherwise.
Best wishes! Michael, CoModerator of ZX.SPECTRUM