RVL4 (It wouldn't be luck, but misfortune would help :) )

22 Oct 97 18:09, Andrew Savichev reported to All about {RVL4 (It wouldn’t be happiness, but
misfortune helped :) )}:

AS> “virtuals” in my face are “greyhounds”. But is it because of a good life? Let's imagine that

/skip/

AS> are duly paid for by all of us - networkers.

It is very doubtful that it will be possible to shake down at least a penny from virtual networkers for Spec's software. And do they need it? In the presence of quake, total
anigilishin, 7x legions, etc.?

Warm greetings, Slava!

PF> Now let’s imagine the train of thought of the “virtual” (not mine, but 99%
PF> of
PF> you):
PF> 1) If I have an emulator, then why do I need a real Speccy?

And then, when emulating something in terms of quality of work, the emulator physically
cannot surpass the original.

PF> 2) If I have a PeeCee/Amiga, then why should I run an emulator on it
PF> and be content with 16-color attribute graphics, when
PF> I can, without any emulators, have 800x600 with 16,000,000 colors?
PF> (follows from point 1).

When changing gloves, leave the old ones, will come in handy.

PF> Let's sum it up and we get a dead Speccy!

You should have given your copyright :)

PF> Bye, with all your best wishes, Pavel Fedin.

With respect, Pavel.

VM> It is very doubtful that it will be possible to shake off at least a penny from virtual networkers
VM> for Spekov software.

I would not say “doubtful”, but “certainly not shaken out” (even on Spec
sedentary programs I bought only the first 3 months)

VM> Yes, that’s it do they need it?

It is necessary (but for nothing ;)

VM> In the presence of quake, total Anigileishin, 7 legions, etc.?

Despite this...

[skipped]

Have a nice connection.
Roman.

26 Oct 97, already 22:50

PM> And then, when emulating something in terms of quality of work, the emulator physically cannot
PM> surpass the original.

I can’t believe my eyes!!! Since when do you humiliate the DUAL PENTIUM
PRO-300 MMX like this???

Bye, with a pack of vicious, Pavel Fedin.

[skipped]

RA>> 1) In this case, it is not necessary to surpass, you need to achieve similarity.
RA>> 2) This does not work for now on 586, but a little later on some thread
RA>> "IBM PC Neintium 986" with 999 megahertz, internal processor cache containing
RA>> all the RAM and ROM of Scorpio, a 200 kilohertz monitor with a resolution of
RA>> 6x4 thousand pixels, it will be possible to emulate everything, including
RA>> the blur of dots on the TV screen characteristic of the spec (sharp
RA>> the squareness of which on emulators is annoying) ;))))

PM> Well, you bent! I once had a 586-133, which did an excellent job
PM> with its duties, at least with the Shalaevsky emulator.

Including multicolor, border effects and 100% similar sound?

[skipped]

Happy connections.
Roman.

01 Nov 97, already 09:02

PM>> cannot surpass the original.
PF> I can’t believe my eyes!!! Since when do you humiliate the DUAL PENTIUM
PF> PRO-300 MMX like this???

But was it really about him? Or am I confusing something? Pentium Pro
(do not confuse with II) comes with a maximum of 233, and there is no MMX in them.
And in general we have deviated from the subject matter.

PF> Bye, with a pack of viciousness, Pavel Fedin.

Sincerely, Pavel.

PM>> coped with its responsibilities, at least with the Shalaevsky
PM>> emulator.

RA> Including multicolor, border effects and 100% similar sound?

Well, 100% Speck sound is only available on spec, and multicolor and border
went with a bang for me

RA> Pleasant connections.
RA> Roman.

RA> 01 Nov 97, already 09:02

Sincerely, Pavel.

PM> Go to www.corbina.ru/~recalder and you’ll understand whether I’m messing around or no.
PM> And you can’t start a flame here while the moderator hasn’t seen :)

Okay, they killed it...