REAL.SPECCY
ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»
From Eugene Malkov → To All 5 February 1998
* Crossposted in ZX.SPECTRUM
* Crossposted in MY_MAIL
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, All!
A new echo has been created - REAL.SPECCY, who is interested - keep it up, we will
hold on.
Hasta la vista.
Tim Kelly
From Sergei Novikov → To All 5 February 1998
•† dR^SNG ÄÉÄû< >ûÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ-=óSNG:DR PGS PHT CCó=-ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄï\/\
í 05.02.98 è SouRCe: Eugene Malkov [aKa 2:465/157.15] † All
´†óHiTeChó†¨Äï/\/ïÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄïfeEL THE POWer!ïÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄû< >ï
EM> œÀ“…‹ ‘…á”ÿ Œœ◊¡— ‹»¡ - REAL.SPECCY, ÀœÕ’ …Œ‘≈“≈”Œœ - ÕŸÃÿ‘≈,
EM> ¬’ƒ≈Õ ƒœ‘—«…◊¡‘ÿ.
· œ fi≈Õ œŒ¡? ˛≈Õ ZX.SPECTRUM –Ü»?
With God's blessing, Sergei Novikov aka Spirit^dR^sNG
ZXNet: 500:095/100.99 î FidoNet: 2:5020/689.1 î E-mail: s-no...@usa.net
From Eugene Malkov → To All 7 February 1998
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Sergei!
Thu Feb 05 1998, Sergei Novikov squeezed the keyboard, hoping that the following words would reach Eugene Malkov
The following words have been released: she? Why is ZX.SPECTRUM bad?
Ask the real people, the ones who are pulling ZX.SPECTRUM from spec.
From Andrey Isaev → To All 8 February 1998
EM> You should ask the realists, the ones who are pulling ZX.SPECTRUM from the spec.
Well, I’m a realist, tell me why the subject is better than ZX.SPECTRUM
Sincerely, Andrey!
--- Life is short. Be patient a little
From Roman Alexandrov → To All 8 February 1998
Hello, Sergei!
05 Feb 98, 14:20, Sergei Novikov wrote to Eugene Malkov on the topic
"REAL.SPECCY":
[skipped]
EM>> A new echo has been created - REAL.SPECCY, who is interested - please,
EM>> we will hold out.
From Eugene Malkov → To All 8 February 1998
*** Answering a msg posted in area MY_MAIL (MY_MAIL).
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Andrey!
Sun Feb 08 1998, Andrey Isaev squeezed the keyboard, hoping that Eugene Malkov
the following words would reach:
EM>>>> A new echo has been created - REAL.SPECCY, for those interested -
EM>>>> wash, we will hold out.
From Evgeny Milun → To All 9 February 1998
2Roman Milukov: is it okay if I throw in a small piece of your letter?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eugene Malkov 2:465/157.15
He creates a new echo REAL.SPECCY! So that there are no bazaars about emuls. For
naturals. Although you can sit there on an emulator, these topics are emulsion -
offtopic.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good luck! Evgeny.
■ The night is shorter than the day... The day will kill me... The world of illusions burns down in it. (C) Aria.
From Denis Dmitriev → To All 10 February 1998
If there are bazaars on the real ZX topic, then it will definitely be better, but in the rules
you need to define conversations about emulators as
a malicious offtopic with a shutdown ;)))
With the best, Denis.
From Sergei Novikov → To All 10 February 1998
With God's blessing, Sergei Novikov aka Spirit^dR^sNG
ZXNet: 500:095/100.99 î FidoNet: 2:5020/689.1 î E-mail: s-no...@usa.net
From Sergei Novikov → To All 10 February 1998
SN>>>> · œ fi≈Õ œŒ¡? ˛≈Õ ZX.SPECTRUM –Ü»?
EM>>> ¸‘œ ‘Ÿ ’ “≈¡Ãÿ›…Àœ◊ ”–“œ”…, ‘≈», fi‘œ ZX.SPECTRUM ”œ ”–≈À¡
EM>>> ‘—Œ’‘.
AI>> H’ — “≈¡Ãÿ›…À, ”À¡÷… ◊”≈‘¡À… fi≈Õ ”¡¬÷ Ã’fi€≈ ZX.SPECTRUM'a
EM> Ù≈Õ, fi‘œ ‘¡Õ Œ≈‘ Õ≈”‘¡ ƒÃ— “¡⁄«œ◊œ“œ◊ œ¬ ‹Õ’בœ“¡», Œ≈‘ Ã…fiŒœ
EM> –≈“≈–…”À… –œ –œÃ «œƒ¡ … À’fi… ¬≈”–œÃ≈⁄ŒŸ» ƒÃ— “≈¡Ãÿ›…Àœ◊ –“œ«“¡ÕÕ ◊ UUE.
Áœ◊œ“¿ ÷≈, ƒœ»ÃŸ ŒœÕ≈“. œƒœ¬Œ¡— ‘≈Õ¡‘…À¡ Õœ÷≈‘ œ⁄Œ¡fi¡‘ÿ Ã…€ÿ ◊ 2 “¡⁄¡ Õ≈Œÿ€≈
–…”≈Õ –“… Œ¡Ã…fi…… ”‘œÃÿÀ…» ÷≈ –œƒ–…”fi…Àœ◊!
From Eugene Malkov → To All 10 February 1998
DD> If there are bazaars on the real ZX topic, then it’s definitely better, but in
DD> rules you need to define conversations about emulators as malicious offtopic
DD> with a shutdown ;)))
That’s how it was originally intended, only _real_ spec, well, shutdown -
this is too much (well, maybe three times ;).
Does anyone else want to subscribe? Tell me where to go? As far as I know, there are already 5030/100.
From Dmitry Grigoryev → To All 11 February 1998
EM> Because there is no place to talk about emulators, there is no personal
EM> correspondence for half a year and a bunch of programs in UUE that are useless for real-life developers.
So this is not “better”, it is just “different” ;) In general... Echo fidoshny? Then you
forgot to put the word “bye”.
EM> Hasta la vista.
EM> Tim Kelly
Sincerely, Dmitry (OLDMAN).
ZXNet: 095/100.1
old...@i-connect.ru
From Alex Gofman → To All 11 February 1998
Hello Eugene !
Tue Feb 10, 1998, Eugene Malkov writes to Denis Dmitriev:
EM> That’s how it was originally intended, only a _real_ spec, well
EM> turning off is too much (well, maybe three times ;).
EM> Does anyone else want to subscribe? Tell me where to go? As far as I know, there are already 5030/100
EM>.
Can you reach 464? otherwise I also want to subscribe to SABZH.
$$$ With best wishes ... Alex
From Eugene Malkov → To All 11 February 1998
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Sergei!
Tue Feb 10 1998, Sergei Novikov squeezed the keyboard, hoping that the following words would reach Eugene Malkov
:
SN> I’m telling you, it’s a dead number. Such a topic can only mean 2
SN> times less letters if there are the same number of subscribers!
Only you forgot that a soaper has already been written for spec and there are more and more real
spectrumists in Fido every day.
From Eugene Malkov → To All 11 February 1998
*** Answering a msg posted in area MY_MAIL (MY_MAIL).
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Dmitry!
Wed Feb 11 1998, Dmitry Grigoryev squeezed his keyboard, hoping that the following words would reach Eugene
Malkov:
EM>> The fact that there is no room for talking about emulators, no
EM>> personal correspondence for half a year and a bunch of programs in UUE that are useless for realists
EM>> programs in UUE.
DG> So this is not “better”, it’s just “different” ;) But in general... Echo fidoshny?
DG> Then you forgot to put the word “yet”.
Yes, I’m not saying what’s better, that’s just how the question was posed. And “for now” there will always be, if the echo does not die out. But I doubt it, since there are more and more real-life people in Fido
and the soap has been written, and soon there will be many and better ones.
From Vyacheslav Mednonogov → To All 12 February 1998
DD> Rules need to define conversations about emulators as malicious offtopic with
DD> disabling ;)))
So, SPB.Speccy has had exactly these rules for a long time. And it’s full of zxnet-ov
eh (where there are almost only Sinclairists).
Warm greetings, Slava!
From Max Romanoff → To All 12 February 1998
Sergei is that you?
...why did you tell Roman Alexandrov about REAL.SPECCY?
SN> Well, that already happened in SPB.SPECCY. And what is the diagnosis? “Bobik died”?
At least, we need to separate the teapots (no, well, maybe someone
would like to answer for the 100th time about what kind of files are .$* and
what they eat them with) from the non-dummies. So that there are no unnecessary monotonous
correspondence with questions. Well, ZX.SPECTRUM.CHAINIK :)
Good Luck...
... C:\ Bad command or file name! Go stand in the corner.
From Eugene Malkov → To All 13 February 1998
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, All!
The subject continues to stretch. Echo already exists on nodes 5030/100, 5030/251,
5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8, 4615/21, 465/70 and, of course, on
smaller ones. You can find out with soap. Where else should I go?
From Alexander Savin → To All 13 February 1998
EM> 5030/100, as far as I know, already exists.
It would not be bad to reach 5015.
[Team "Gaza Strip" - rulezz!]
From Igor Gruzdev → To All 13 February 1998
Hello, Sergei!
It’s quiet outside the window, and I’m sitting and writing a response to a letter written from Sergei Novikov to
Roman Alexandrov Tue Feb 10, 1998 at 02:02 pm...
RA>> A wild amount of left-wing chatter not related to the real spec, IMHO.
SN> Well, that’s already happened in SPB.SPECCY. And what is the diagnosis? “Bobby died”?
More alive than dead. Although... Camatous state. ;(
With all kinds of regards and wishes.
Igor.
... Evil spirits are best preserved in environmentally friendly places.
From Evgeny Milun → To All 13 February 1998
Hello Eugene !
Tuesday February 10 1998 19:35, Eugene Malkov ─── Denis Dmitriev:
[.....]
EM> That’s how it was originally intended, only a _real_ spec, but turning off
EM> is too much (well, maybe three times ;).
EM> Someone still want to subscribe? Tell me where to go? As far as I know, 5030/100
EM> already exists.
Pull it here. To Samara. :)))
From Andrew Savichev → To All 14 February 1998
>
> Stretching of the subject continues. Echo already exists on nodes 5030/100, 5030/251,
5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8, 4615/21, 465/70 and, of course, on
smaller ones. You can find out with soap. Where else should I go?
From Alex Baskakov → To All 14 February 1998
Hello, Eugene!
Once Eugene Malkov 13 Feb 98 at 23:31 wrote, addressing All:
EM> The subject continues to stretch. Echo already exists on nodes 5030/100,
EM> 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8, 4615/21, 465/70 and,
EM> of course, on smaller ones. You can find out with soap. Where else to go?
Pull to Voronezh! :)
All the best, Alexey.
From Roman Milukov → To All 15 February 1998
DD> is better, but in the rules
DD> you need to define conversations about emulators as
DD> malicious offtopic with a shutdown ;)))
And there it is! What is good for a virtual person is not always good for a straight person, and
sometimes it is burdensome!
All the best.
With respect, Roman Milukov.
From Alexander Savin → To All 17 February 1998
EM> Stretching of the subject continues. Echo is already available on nodes 5030/100,
EM> 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8, 4615/21, 465/70
From Eugene Malkov → To All 18 February 1998
*** Answering a msg posted in area MY_MAIL (MY_MAIL).
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Alexander!
Tue Feb 17 1998, Alexander Savin squeezed the keyboard, hoping that the following words would reach Eugene Malkov
the following words:
EM>> Stretching of the subject continues. Echo is already available on nodes
EM>> 5030/100, 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8,
EM>> 4615/21, 465/70 and, of course, on smaller ones. You can clarify
EM>> with soap. Where else to go?
AS> To Nizhny Novgorod [5015] plzzz...
Help is needed in subscribing nodes 464/500, 5020/50 and 5020/400, only through
which many who asked here can reach the echo. The nodes refuse to subscribe, citing the fact that none of the downlinks asked for it. Ask, otherwise
nothing will come of it. And send letters to those who sign in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other
cities. This also applies to Nizhny. I will provide all possible assistance in further stretching; whoever needs it, I’ll throw some shinbai soap.
From Roman Khroupnin → To All 19 February 1998
High Alexander!
EM>> Stretching of the subject continues. Echo already exists on nodes 5030/100,
EM>> 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8, 4615/21, 465/70
EM>> and, of course, on smaller ones. You can find out with soap. Where else should I go?
From Konstantin Samoylov → To All 20 February 1998
EM>> 5030/100, 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8,
EM>> 4615/21, 465/70 and, of course, on smaller ones. You can clarify
EM>> with soap. Where else should I go?
From Andrey Mihaylow → To All 20 February 1998
KS> To Izhevsk [5050] plzzz...
What the hell, I still can’t understand why zx-spectrum isn’t working for me?
Over there in SPB.SPECCY it’s empty, but climbing through the heaps, oh, to be honest, it’s breaking...
Sincerely, Andrey Mihaylow
From Denis Dmitriev → To All 22 February 1998
EM> nodes 5030/100,
EM> 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8,
EM> 4615/21, 465/70
EM> and, of course, on smaller ones. You can find out with soap.
EM> Where else should I go?
Oh, you can get there on 461/110? ;)
From Dmitry Grigoryev → To All 22 February 1998
Hello, Eugene!
Wednesday February 11, 1998 21:04, Eugene Malkov wrote to Dmitry Grigoryev:
EM> Yes, I’m not saying which is better, that’s just how the question was posed. And “for now”
EM> there will always be, if the echo does not die out. But I doubt it, because
EM> there are more and more real-life people in Fido, the soap opera has been written, and soon there will be
EM> a lot of them and better ones.
Then there is a chance. You also have SPB.SPECCY ;) Although, in my opinion, there are still only a few people who access Fido from
Spectrums, not through gates...
From Eugene Malkov → To All 23 February 1998
Here again we run into 5020/400, which for some reason unknown to itself does not respond to soap. Request to All from 5020 - contact 5020/400 by soap or by phone and ask him to subscribe to 5020/52, 465/70 or 464/500 on
REAL.SPECCY. As soon as the echo comes out on 5020/400, I will reach everyone
(Yoshkar-Ola, Izhevsk, etc.)
From Pavel Nikonov → To All 23 February 1998
EM>>>> Stretching of the subject continues. Echo is already present on nodes
EM>>>> 5030/100, 5030/251, 5030/23, 5020/52, 5061/33, 4616/2, 4624/8,
EM>>>> 4615/21, 465/70 and, of course, on smaller ones. You can clarify
EM>>>> with soap. Where else should I go?
From Eugene Malkov → To All 24 February 1998
PN> I missed it...will the subject get to Samara[5057]?
PN> @PATH: 5057/10 1 5020/400 464/41 500 465/70
^^^^^^^^ ^^^
As soon as we get through to these nodes, it will happen. I'll tell you in an echo when we get through, then repeat with soap who is pulling through these nodes from 5020 and 465. (Who doesn’t know
where the echoes come from, look at the PATH of my letter).
From Eugene Malkov → To All 24 February 1998
*** Answering a msg posted in area MY_MAIL (MY_MAIL).
I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Dmitry!
Sun Feb 22, 1998, Dmitry Grigoryev squeezed the keyboard, hoping that the following words would reach Eugene
Malkov:
DG> Then there is a chance. You also have SPB.SPECCY ;) Although, in my opinion, there are still only a few people entering
DG> Fido from Spectrums, not through gates...
But there should be more! Or are you already forever accustomed to the Spectrum
launched from under the MD95?