Is there a flood after you?

DG>> Can you guess it three times? ;) I don’t think so... When you do something
DG>> that will cost money (first hint: and invest in it),
DG>> you’ll probably understand...

EM> Oh moment... What kind of funds did you invest? Maybe its time? In
EM> 22nd and 23rd? Is this happening in the viewer? It's a lot of fairy tales to tell... It's as if I don't know how to make a viewer for the next issue of any magazine... Guess it on the hundredth try. Such obvious things, in theory, should come through on their own.

DG>> (hint two: the authors are promised a fee) But in the end,
DG>> naturally, any product is made for the consumer (or do you think,
DG>> that we were “selling air”?) - the reader received the magazine, the goal was achieved,
DG>> what does subj have to do with it?

EM> Yeah... For some reason they come to my mind Matveev's words about
EM> that my articles about computers are for 1% of readers...

It seems that we were talking about your letters to the editor. Although the senile LIKBEZES in
Oberon are no better.

EM> From which it follows that the SPF is for 99% (That’s just me... by the way...)

??? Your logic is interesting...

AM>>> and if you SOLD LICENSES, then all distribution rights belong to
AM>>> sellers.
DG>> You, I see, have learned to set quotas? In golded it's probably more convenient? But,
DG>> as always, you cut it out without reading it :( I repeat, selling a LICENSE FOR
DG>> RETAIL TRADE or ALL DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS are completely different
DG>> things. No one has acquired the exclusive rights, they are still ours.
EM> Fuck it... Go your way Tell your friends this... When selling
EM> a license, you enter into some kind of agreement with the distributor, according to which
EM> you undertake to at least at least protect his interests...

Yes... It’s a difficult case... I don’t even want to explain (it’s already clear to other subscribers, but it’s just so... Maybe I can explain with soap (if you want)).

DG>> PS: I really liked your article, where you extolled the Spectrum and blamed
DG>> pussies!

EM> And now it means you don’t like it ????

[?!?!?!] The article came out a couple of months ago, why talk about it in
the present tense?!

EM> You know, I’ve always said that when considering the quality of
EM> programs/articles, your first priority is your personal attitude to
EM> the person.

Well, I say: it’s time to have a rich imagination...

PS: I should go into soap, but it’s better just don’t answer, so as not to waste my money.время
(And not РВЛ :).

With God's blessing, Novikov Sergei AKA Spirit/STEP

┌─/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/─┐
│ [Team ZASM] [Team AMD] [Team EM2D] [Team Spectrum Revival] [Team Art Works] │
└─\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/─ ┘

AM>>>> and if you SOLD LICENSES, then all distribution rights belong to
AM>>>> sellers.
DG>>> You, I see, have learned to set quotas? In golded it's probably more convenient? But,
DG>>>, as always, you cut it out without reading it :( I repeat, selling a LICENSE FOR
DG>>> RETAIL TRADE or ALL DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS are completely different
DG>>> things. No one has acquired the exclusive rights, they are still ours.
EM>> Fuck... Go tell your fellow lamers this... When selling
EM>> a license, you enter into some kind of agreement with the distributor, according to which
EM>> you undertake to at least at least protect his interests...

SN>> my time (and don’t hold up RVL :).
EM> Seriously???? And if I still answer - RVL will stay for a month? What a shame...

Yeah!!! After the first issue, you sent an enthusiastic-unenthusiastic, but
positive letter, where you even wanted to throw in an article for the newspaper.

EM> + Origin: Kill All Harkonnen !!! (FidoNet 2:5057/18.73)

Well, well! Have you decided to improve? Once upon a time there was a loud howl about the correctness of the word 'Harkonnens'...

PS: And the Harkonnens are rulez. The Atreides were crushed, crushed, crushed, crushed ;)) Keladan
blown up, blew up, blew up, blew up ;)

DG>>>>> PS: I really liked your article, where you extolled the Spectrum and blamed
DG>>>>> pussies!
EM>>>> And now it means not to like it ????
SN>>> [?!?!?!] The article came out a couple of months ago. Why talk about her
SN>>> in the present tense?!
EM>> Did you understand anything in what you wrote??? We were just talking
EM>> about the present tense... But I don’t need to start a philological discussion here...

SN>> doesn’t read SPF (which leads to sad thoughts about
SN>> what reading your articles does to a person)? And vice versa: those who do not
SN>> read SPF - read only your articles...
EM> Nope, no... Everything was just the other way around - Matveev said that for 99%
EM> of SPF readers, so the articles are uninteresting...

Lies. Prove otherwise. He didn't say that.

EM>>> ? But, as far as I know, there is nothing supernova there either, for which
EM>>> you had to shell out money... So what did you spend it on?
SN>> No, well, this is something. With such a fantasy, yes, to be the editor-in-chief of
SN>> magazine... =(
EM> Oops... And when did I become one?

What, they kicked me out after all? I sympathize.

EM> Ahhh, I get it... You just have nothing to answer, and you are hitting at random...
EM> Got it...

You got it wrong, as always;)

EM> So What did you spend the money on anyway?

No, it’s better to guess for yourself. Train your brain ;) Hint: Start to understand the components of the magazine - what does it consist of? 1) articles, 2)... Well?

EM>>>> Nope... What else is left there? Lyrics? You either wrote them yourself,
EM>>>> or took them from here, or took them from the Internet... Programs? Is it their
EM>>>>? But, as far as I know, there is nothing supernova there either, for which you had to shell out money... So what did you spend it on?
SN>>> No, well, this is something. With such a fantasy, yes, to be the editor-in-chief of
SN>>> the magazine... =(
EM>> Oops... And when did I become one?

EM>> Yes, no... I have never been one...
SN> So, do you have a magazine without an editor-in-chief? 8) Nonsense...
Why without the main thing? There is... Instead of writing the previous
phrase, you would first download the magazine and look for yourself...

EM>> Where did you get this from? Oh, well, yes... You know about our magazine only
EM>> from the words of Matveev...
SN> Yes... Another Milunov insanity. Why write this ( ) when you know
SN> that it is not so? Although I should get used to it by now... ;*(
Well, if you call me editor-in-chief, then you either haven’t seen the
magazine, because everything is written there (even in Russian, can you imagine?) or you
have again been visited by the thirst to flame...
And what does “this is not so” mean? Throw a bar of your soap ?