A couple of quotes

ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»

From Vyacheslav Mednonogov To All 26 October 1997


Get Msg, All!


Continuing my favorite topic :)

Sinclairists of all countries, think thrice before
choosing a new platform!

=== Cut ===
─ [3] RU.AMIGA (2:5030/362.4) ─────────────────────────────────────── RU.AMIGA
From : Alexey Emelyanov 2:5020/275.2 21 Oct 97 09:01:00
To : Andrew Fedorov
Subj : ZX.SPECTRUM
─────────── ────────────────────────── ────────────────────────── ────────────────
Hello, Andrew !
In a letter dated 19 Oct 97 you wrote to me:

AF> ZX.SPECTRUM will die...

and who will cry?

/long signature cut/

─ [3] RU.AMIGA (2:5030/362.4) ─────────────────────────────────────── RU.AMIGA
From : Denis Sotchenko 2:5020/301.7 24 Oct 97 02:35:00
To : Paul Falcon
Subj : DraCo VLab (and not only)
────────────── ───────────────────────── ───────────────────────── ───────────────
Somehow times 23 Oct 97 Paul Falcon wrote the following for Dmitriy Shishkin:

/cut/

PF> would you like to make your echo officially gated with our network?

Under no circumstances. We don't need a bunch of lamers at all

/long signature cut/

=== Cut ===

^^^^^^^^ (Here we are talking about gating ru.amiga in Spb.ZxNet)


Warm greetings,Слава!


From Alex Letaev To All 27 October 1997


Hello Vyacheslav Mednonogov! In a message of 26 Oct 97 Vyacheslav Mednonogov wrote to All:

VM> Continuing my favorite topic :)

And would you like to continue it?

VM> Sinclairists of all countries, think thrice before
VM> before choosing a new platform!

And also think that after all, you are going to move to the _platform_, and not
to the _people_ who have this platform. :-)))))

And if I write how many psshniks, when they see Spectrum discs for sale on the market, start laughing like idiots, even 100 such pages will not be enough for one trading weekend. And for some reason, for example, RU.WINDOWS too
why they _really_ won’t want to involve spektrumists, and there will be even
more “warm” words! And what starfucker said about speckies and spektrumists, you forgot to add to this message for comparison (it was the view of a psshnik), and there would be a contrast on the face. And if so, then it is not known who is better to treat speckies,
Amigists or Ptsshniks!

P.S. This is IMHO, fanning hostility between platforms, and quite a major
provocation.

With respect, Alex from FFC COMPUTERS.


From Vyacheslav Mednonogov To All 29 October 1997

AL> P.S. This is IMHO, fanning hostility between platforms, and quite
AL> a major provocation.

No, not that big :)

Warm greetings, Slava!


From Iliya Kaledin To All 30 October 1997


Hello Rick.

28 Oct 97 17:14, Rick Murray wrote to Alex Letaev:

AL>> pages in one trading weekend. And for some reason, for example, for RU.WINDOWS
AL>> for some reason they also _really_ don’t want to connect spektrumists,

RM> why does spektrumist need ru.vyndos?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:) So the work speeds are the same :)))
Tell me, is there at least one person who has a point on his Speccy?

WBR Iliya

... Scoop - mustdie :( -= Russian Team GUS =-

From Alex Letaev To All 31 October 1997


Hello Rick Murray! In a message of 28 Oct 97 Rick Murray wrote to me:

RM> one trading day off. And for example, for RU.WINDOWS too
AL>> for some reason they _really_ don’t want to connect spektrumists,

From Pavel Fedin To All 31 October 1997

IMHO, people are to blame for this attitude towards us, not the platform.

PS: in your opinion, since I have an Amiga, I’m the last piece of shit, right? :-E

Bye, with a pack of vicious, Pavel Fedin.


From Igor Gruzdev To All 2 November 1997

AL> Then why ru.amiga. They were going to connect to it.

Agree, ru.amyga exists, but ru.ibm does not (?).


With all sorts of regards and wishes.
Igor.

... God is like a policeman - he is never there where he is needed.

From Vsevolod Potapov To All 2 November 1997

Regards,
Random
--
Lord of Chaos.
e-mail: ran...@cybermail.net

Concern Chaos WWW HQ: http://www.cybermail.net/~random/

From Alex Letaev To All 3 November 1997


Hello Iliya Kaledin! In a message of 02 Nov 97 Iliya Kaledin wrote to me:

AL>> I will say that it is not necessary to have a PC to work in fido.
IK> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
IK> the thing is that I have been looking for a long time for a person who would work in FIDO on
IK> Speccy...
IK> The poll continues: does anyone do this?

I was in ru.amiga Pavel Falcon from Speccy, so they probably disconnected him from there because
he was talking nonsense. It's from 5030, if necessary I'll look up the address.

IK> And the most convenient FIDO-soft IMHO is on AMIGA.... ;) I'm aware

I haven't tried working in ZED yet, but for now yes.

From Igor Gruzdev To All 3 November 1997

Iliya Kaledin Mon Nov 03 1997 at 07:48...

AL> I was in ru.amiga Pavel Falcon from Speckie, so they probably disconnected him from there,
AL> because he was talking nonsense. He's from 5030, if necessary I'll look up the address.

This is my address. This is a zkhnetchik. Only used it as a user of my bbsa. Via
terminal and writing modem.

AL> I haven’t tried to work in ZED yet, but for now yes.

;) On spec it’s cooler. ;)

From Igor Gruzdev To All 4 November 1997

Igor Gruzdev Tue Nov 04, 1997 at 07:47...

IG>> This is my address. This is a zkhnetchik. Only as a user of my bbsa.
IG>> Through a terminal and a writing modem.
AL> Has it already been disabled, or not yet? :-)))))

No idea. I don’t see that echo in my grandfather. Only echoes of abuse in the form of increased non-soap traffic to the network and back are visible. ;)

IG>> ;) On spec it’s cooler. ;)
AL> I'll buy a second one and check it out.

ZED is almost a copy of golded. Not even almost, but a copy. :) Convenient, everything is at hand.
The only negative is 64 characters per line. Moreover, if the “header” of the letter is still
clear, then it would not be a bad idea to implement the text itself in 42 characters, well, like
IS-DOS (to read - it’s fashionable to add, to write - using the config we find the number of
characters in the line, then transfer it).

From Alex Letaev To All 6 November 1997

IG> ZED is almost a copy of golded. Not even almost, but a copy. :) Convenient, everything is at your fingertips. The only negative is 64 characters per line. Moreover, if in the 'header'
IG> of the letter it is still clear, then it would not be bad to implement the text itself in 42
IG> characters, well, like is-dos (to read - it’s fashionable to add, to write - using the
IG> config we find the number of characters in the line, then transfer it).

And I don’t like GoldEd.

From Rick Murray To All 11 November 1997

IG> the letter is still clear, it would be nice to implement the text itself in 42 characters,

hmm.. well, I don’t know. for example, on my TV everything is perfectly visible and readable. and
colors can be adjusted to enhance readability. in general, in fact, I'm too lazy
to redo the text engine :)


Goodbye.
Rick Murray
ri...@murray.chel.su


From Igor Gruzdev To All 12 November 1997

IG>> ZED is almost a copy of golded. Not even almost, but a copy. :) Convenient, everything is at
IG>> at hand. The only negative is 64 characters per line. Moreover, if in the 'header'
IG>> the letter is still clear, then the text itself would not be bad to implement in 42

From Igor Gruzdev To All 15 November 1997


Hello, Evgeny!

It’s quiet outside the window, and I’m sitting and writing a response to a letter written from Evgeny Milun to
Igor Gruzdev Fri Nov 14, 1997 at 10:13 am...

IG>> Everyone has their own tastes. I don't like working in graphic modes. :)
IG>> And 64 characters in a line are exactly what they remind us of.
EM> No, I don’t like 64 characters for a slightly different reason - it’s not
EM> ergonomic, it’s a direct route to a shark doctor. But, when you contact
EM> text typed on IBM with 80 characters... Yesterday I was climbing from spec on
EM> bbs, oh damn, that was fun - even with 64 characters half of the text
EM> went to the top... And what would have happened if there were 42 characters ?

Docs and user manuals in bbski need to be read. ;) In settings on the BBS, you just need to simply set the screen width to 64/42 characters. Well, or the height of the screen is two times smaller. And a request for more[Y,n]. No problem.

From Evgeny Milun To All 17 November 1997

IG>>> Everyone has their own tastes. I don't like working in graphic modes. :)
IG>>> And 64 characters in a line are exactly what they remind us of.
EM>> No, I don’t like 64 characters for a slightly different reason - it’s not
EM>> ergonomic, it’s a direct route to a shark doctor. But, when you contact
EM>> text typed on IBM with 80 characters... Yesterday I was climbing from spec on
EM>> bbs, oh damn, that was fun - even with 64 characters half of the text
EM>> went to the top... And what would happen if there were 42 characters ?