Final results of the survey on Sprinter's video output.

So, the survey on the Sprinter video output is completed.
It was conducted over 2 weeks, from January 22 to February 6, 1998.
Thanks to everyone who sent letters and answered questions, I hope this
will be perceived by the developers of video systems for the Spectrum as a kind of
order. Although the number of respondents does not allow us to guarantee that exactly
this percentage of potential buyers want to have a modern monitor (albeit more expensive) to work with
Spectrum.
In total, 10 letters were received + 1 vote is mine :).

Geography:
----------
Moscow - 3;
Kharkov - 2;
Barnaul - 1;
Yoshkar-Ola - 1;
Krasnoyarsk - 1;
Chisinau - 1;
Rovno - 1;
St. Petersburg - 1.

Now let's turn to which specific Spectrums people answered from.

"Breed":
--------
Virtual (emulator) - 5;
Pentagon - 512 - 2;
Spectrum - 48 - 2; (one is with a modem!, but the second one?
the second one obviously responds from a computer
at work)
Scorpio ZS-256 - 1;
GRM - 512 - 1.

Results "for":
---------------
only SVGA (VGA) - 8;
only CGA (RGB) - 3;
only PAL - 0.

Comment:
----------
11 out of 200 (estimated number of subscriberszx.spectrum);
geography, as you can see, is very wide ;) ;
Spectrums - almost all except ATM and Pro;
8 out of 11 have memory > 512Kb;
The most interested in the Sprinter, as I expected, are virtuals,
and among naturals, owners of Spectrum-48 and Pentagon -128, converted into 512 ;

! 8:3 in favor of supporters of modern monitors!

Sincerely, Andrey Savichev / CGS