"ZX Spectrum emulator on PC"

Once Alex Petrovskii 15 Mar 98 at 23:57 wrote, addressing Andrey
Teplyakov:

SV>> Tell me, is there a subject to play Spectrum's games on a PC?

AT> No. This is impossible in principle.

AP> Where did you come from? What's a bunch of emulators for? I currently have 3
AP> Specki emulator on my PC! And everyone is plowing.
Come on?

AP> What are you doing, man? :-( )
AP> Don't confuse the person. They'll laugh at you, I feel it. Yes, I said it!

AP> With respect, Shor Kan.

Dear Shor Kan! Don't you think that _YOU_ will be laughed at?

All the best, Alexey.

P.S. NO, IT'S TIME FOR EVERYONE TO GO TO REAL.SPECCY

No, it doesn’t seem like it, since I have already received two letters explaining that this
man was joking and they dealt with him.
Although the joke is quite stupid.....

Sincerely, Shor Kan.

... If a person died, this will last a long time, but if he is a FOOL, this forever.

AP>> With respect Shor Kan.
AB> Dear Shor Kan! Don't you think that _YOU_ will be laughed at?
As far as I understand, you are just talking about different things.
You probably meant that the command systems do not match, which means
Spectrum programs cannot _DIRECTLY_ work on the Spectrum? You're right - they can't, in principle.
But AP is talking about the emulator... And he's also 100% right. Moreover, in
the context of your words, it’s you who seems funny...

Good luck! Evgeny.

■ The night is shorter than the day... The day will kill me... The world of illusions burns down in it. (C) Aria.

AB> Dear Shor Kan! Don't you think that _YOU_ will be laughed at?

EM> As far as I understand, you are just talking about different things.
EM> You probably meant that the command systems do not match, which means
EM> Spectrum programs cannot _DIRECTLY_ work on the Spectrum? You
EM> are right - they can’t, in principle.
EM> But AP is talking about the emulator... And he’s also 100% right. Moreover, in
EM> the context of your words, it’s you who seems funny...
Gee...
Another “serious” one...
Do you all only have NETMAIL and ZX.SPECTRUM???

After all, it was said that by definition there cannot be features for playing Speck
games on the PC. And talking about the -direct- work of Spec's
programs could only have occurred to YOU.

2All: How can we get REAL.SPECCY to Voronezh??? Otherwise it’s time to go there...

See you! Write more!
Alexey.

> After all, it was said that features for playing Speck
> games cannot exist by definition. And we’re talking about the direct work of Spekov’s

Listen, maybe I’m a fool, but you’re not a genius either! What do you mean by saying
that you can’t play Spec’s games on a PC? Or, for example, UFO1 Slavino is not a Spectrum game? Then what was I playing now in the Shalaevsky emulator? Eh
I like to sometimes go out into nature and demolish half the city. ;) If I launch the same DIZZY on a PC, does it not become a Spectrum game? There is clearly a misunderstanding and misunderstanding of each other's terms. Or maybe you haven’t even seen RS?

> 2All: How can we get REAL.SPECCY to Voronezh??? Otherwise it’s time to go there
>...

Wow, didn’t you go to real life..... If I don’t have Speck at work, so
should I drag him out of the house? And then what do you use to run programs at home?

No, this is all some kind of big misunderstanding. :-(((

Sincerely Shor Kan.

... Oh again, again, many many more times... Too many open files

Somehow in my spare time Alex Petrovskii 21 Mar 98 at 21:54 wrote the following for Alex Baskakov

AP> Listen, maybe I’m a fool, but you’re not a genius either! What do you mean by
AP> that you can’t play Spec’s games on a PC? Or for example UFO1
AP> Slavino is not a Spectrum game? Then what was I playing now in the
AP> Shalaevsky emulator? Oh, sometimes I like to go out into nature and demolish half the city
AP> . ;) If I launch the same DIZZY on a PC, does it become not
AP> a Spectrum game? There is clearly a misunderstanding and misunderstanding of each other in
AP> terms. Or maybe you haven’t even seen RS?

AB> Gee... Another 'serious'...
AB> After all, it was said that by definition there cannot be features for playing Spec's
AB> games on the PC. And talking about the -direct- work of Spekov's
AB> programs could only have occurred to YOU.
Firstly, your words can be regarded as an attack... Secondly, since I
didn't see a single emoticon in your letter, and you said a complete blizzard, then
you shouldn't have thought that I would regard your letter as "funny. Thirdly, I don't I understand
what “features” are you talking about? As far as I know, if you launch a
simulator on the PC, and from it a Spectrum game, it will still be considered that you are
“playing on the PC” (Or was that just a joke?)

I greet you from the bottom of my heart, Alex!

Fri Mar 20, 1998, Alex Baskakov squeezed the keyboard, hoping that the following words would reach Evgeny Milun
:

AB> 2All: How can I get REAL.SPECCY to Voronezh??? Otherwise it’s time to go there
AB>...

And like this:

AB> @PATH: 5025/38 18 8 5020/204 238 443 400

And on 5020/400 it’s already there.

Hasta la vista.
Tim Kelly

EM> Firstly, your words can be regarded as an attack... Secondly,
EM> since I didn’t see a single emoticon in your letter, and you said
EM> a complete blizzard, I shouldn’t have thought that I would regard your letter as “funny.”
EM> Thirdly, I didn’t understand what “features” you were talking about you say? As far as I know,
EM> if you launch a simulation game on the PC, and from it a Spectrum game, it will still be considered that you are “playing on the PC”. 'Shovel' in a joke)

Yes, if you play a Specov toy under an emulsion on a PC, then you play on a PC
So what?

AB> I don’t really respect the use of emoticons, because... this humiliates your
AB> interlocutor (it’s like the “Shovel” in the joke)
Usually the emoticon makes it clear to the interlocutor in what tone you say this phrase
(assault/irony/joke/surprise/...), and therefore more fully understand the meaning
of this phrase. (Read some text about Fido at your leisure, for example “64K about
Fido”).
In this case, we have a double interpretation of your phrase -
_you_ consider it a joke, and everyone else, not seeing the emoticons, takes it
seriously.

AB> Yes, if you play Spekov's toy under emulsion on the PC, then you play on
AB> PC So what?
Nothing, just if you decided to “joke” here and throw left and right
phrases like “you will be laughed at,” “this thought could only have occurred to you,”
etc., then you were mistaken. For the reasons I have already given above (see above),
they are laughing at you, and at your attempts to prove “it was a joke.”

22 Mar 98 11:56, Alex Baskakov wrote to Alex Petrovskii:

AB> DAMN. IT WAS A JOKE. OR MOCKING OF LAMERITY, IF YOU WANT.

emoticons should be included. you're our joker.

Bye!
Rick Murray
mur...@geocities.com http://hey.to/letit ICQ:6653886

Somehow in my spare time, Evgeny Milun 26 Mar 98 at 16:41 wrote the following for Alex Baskakov
:
EM> In this case, we just have a double interpretation of your phrase -
EM> _you_ consider it a joke, and everyone else, without seeing the emoticons, accepts her
EM> seriously.
Well, not everything is acceptable...

EM> Nothing, it’s just that if you decided to “joke” here and throw left and right
EM> with phrases like “you will be laughed at,” “this thought could only have occurred to you,”
EM>, etc., then you are mistaken. For the reasons I have already given above (see above),
EM> they are laughing at you, and at your attempts to prove “it was
EM> a joke.”
Yes, yes, yes... Everyone is just going crazy.
Now I understand why people don’t like you... :))))))))
As my friend said: 'Don’t make a problem out of an elephant.'

EM>> to you", etc., then you are mistaken. For the reasons I have already given above (see
EM>> above), they are laughing at you, and at your attempts to prove “it
EM>> was a joke.”
AB> Yes, yes, yes... Everyone is just freaking out.
AB> Now I understand why people don’t like you... :))))))))
Well, let's not go over the same old... Although, if you are interested, then only 1-2 people hate me (I won’t name names).
AB> As my friend said: “Don’t make a problem out of an elephant.”
Do you remember how it all started? No? forgetful
you are ours.
You “joked.” Several people did not understand your “joke.” You began to attack them, at first in a serious manner - “yes, you are lamer,” and only then - “yes, it was a joke.” I tried to reconcile you, saying that perhaps you were just talking about different things. “Only you could have come up with such an idea.”
Now I’ve cut it off? Still no. Ugh, it’s difficult with you... Then it’s like this: “joke -
joking, but if you’re not LameroFlamer, then don’t start a flame if your ‘joke’
wasn’t appreciated.”
Didn’t cut it off again? Then I can’t help you anymore...

EM> Do you remember how it all started? No? Well then, I’ll remind you,
EM> you are our forgetful one.
EM> You were “joking”. Several people didn't understand your "joke". You started to run into them
EM>. Moreover, at first in a serious way - “yes, you are lamer,” and only then - “yes, it was a joke.” I tried to reconcile you by saying that maybe you were just talking about different things. You came at me in the style of “only
EM> you could have come up with such an idea.”
EM> Now you’ve cut it off? Still not. Ugh, it’s difficult with you... Then this: “joke -
EM> joke, but if you are not LameroFlamer, then don’t start a flame if your
EM> ‘joke’ was not appreciated.”
EM> Missed it again? Then I can't help you anymore...
I missed it. But your memory is bad.
#01 It wasn’t me who made the joke at the beginning (about “it’s not possible in principle”), although I regret it...
#02 I didn’t call anyone lamer, and you have a temporary error in the story:
I wrote: “DAMN! IT WAS A JOKE! OR A MOCKERY OF LAMERITY, IF
PLEASE” Here.

And why are you offended by the phrase “only you could have come up with such
an idea”???

It seems to me that we have moved somewhat away from the topic of this echo conference, therefore
I propose to close the debate on this issue. Who's in favor?

Answer more often! Be conscious!
Increase your traffic!Bdi!
Lyokha.

Wednesday April 01 1998 13:10, Alex Baskakov ─── Evgeny Milun:

AB> It seems to me that we have moved somewhat away from the topic of this echo conference, therefore
AB> I propose to close the debate on this issue. Who's for?
Ya. :)
Amen.