Echo & ZED

ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»

From Alexey Ivanov To All 24 December 1997


=============================================================================
* Forwarded by Alexey Ivanov (2:5020/689.100)
* Area : RU.ZXNET.GENERAL (Eagle Mail)
* From : Walerij Kozhevnik, 500:95/462.18 (September 24, 1997) 22:32)
* To : Igor Timashov
* Subj : Echo & ZED
=============================================================================
Hello, Igor!
Sun 21 Dec 1997 13:07, Igor Timashov wrote to me:

IT> If only Kharkov had the Internet and a way out of their ZechNet in Fido can
IT> it would be nice to set up a direct link.

I asked him a couple of times about his terminal for Scorp with
Hayes - to no avail. Maybe I didn’t get it, or maybe I didn’t answer. :(

IT> We would have gathered in a big, big bunch and made a single chorus

If only. Otherwise, you have MMD, we have CDOS, in Kharkov ZSC, so figure it out.
We should put the level responsible for exchange with the line into a separate file
and agree on entry points so that any program would work
with any modem. CDOS was like that, until not packed.
In short, again isdos.

It would be possible under iS-DOS. (C) AI. What is the general opinion?
When IS'DOS rustles on the propeller, I feel like I'm sitting behind a stinking turbojet Pentium, and I put up with this rustling
for only one reason: the speed corresponds to this stump.
Transfer when reading/writing the order. 100 k per second, and yet
I still have the very first and slowest driverHDD.
If we take into account the volumes of swap that are more than modest by PC standards,
this is enough to the very ears.

IT> software that met all the requirements and standards, and
IT> we can take the same ZED as a basis

Zed is written in C, and that’s why after the isdos it seems like a terrible
slower.
The existing software needs to be configured. And then the AI says, my pkt people
are tossing crookedly, throwing them with their hands.
In theory, his golded should perceive my pkt
as their own: we have the same FMPT kludge, the only difference is in
the from field.
Here is an example of my kludges:
є─
║@INTL 2:5030/529 2:5020/689
║@FMPT 100
║@TOPT 16
║@MSGID: 2:5020/689.100 61BF05A6
║@PID: ZED 1.02B.ZX48
╙─

And here it is Goldedovsky:
є─
╟@INTL 2:5020/659 2:5020/689
║@TOPT 55
║@FMPT 100
║@MSGID: 2:5020/689.100@FidoNet 345a6a55
║@REPLY: 2:5020/659.55 345a5204
║ ;there was a letter.
║
║@Via 2:5020/689.100@fidonet @19971031.233349.UTC+3 T-Mail
║2603.DOS
╙─

I don’t know where the glitch is, although I can guess.
I’ve also seen a PATH kludge here and there, but I think it’s only for hubs
means something.

By the way, zed swears at uuencode by nafigator with crc64, therefore
nafigator - mazday. And small software along with it. crc32 - rulezz!

VK>>> I’m generally silent about spbzxnet: everyone hid.

IT>> Hmm... A pebble in our garden?

AI> No, he meant the missing echo SPB.SPECCY She
AI> stopped going and
AI> unfollowed her.

It was her. Creator still appears occasionally. By the way, no one knows whether he adapted his X-PLAYER to trdos? Or is he still so good at it? It spoils disks all the time, it doesn’t care about the screw, but on
GRMs it generally hangs around the clock - trdos there is non-standard.
IMHO, a turboloader must die forever!

PS: Folks, does anyone have a pkunzip with great efficiency? Is it really too lazy to send?
Someone tell me the thread, plz. Because it’s necessary, you know.
And archivers too. There's no volume there.

That's all.
Jason.

-+- ZED 1.02ы
+ Origin: MGTS is hungry for money! And we long for MGTS! (500:95/462.18)


From George Shepelev To All 29 December 1997

AI> If only. Otherwise, you have MMD, we have CDOS, in Kharkov ZSC, so figure it out.
AI> It would be necessary to move the level responsible for exchange with the line into a separate file
AI>, and agree on entry points so that any program would work
AI> with any modem. CDOS was like that until it was packaged.

Look for a laugh at how the connection to the modem was done in my terminal
T02. Was thrown into the echo. There, all this was logically thought out and quite well documented. But the people didn’t want standardization...


Sincerely, George


From Rick Murray To All 10 February 1998


Hello!

24 Dec 97 22:48, Alexey Ivanov wrote to All:

letter to Walerij Kozhevnik, 500:95/462.18

AI> є─
AI> ║@INTL 2:5030/529 2:5020/689
AI> ║@FMPT 100
AI> ║@TOPT 16
AI> ║@MSGID: 2:5020/689.100 61BF05A6
AI> ║@PID: ZED 1.02B.ZX48
AI> ╙─

AI> And here it is Goldedovsky:
AI> є─
AI> ╟@INTL 2:5020/659 2:5020/689
AI> ║@TOPT 55
AI> ║@FMPT 100
AI> ║@MSGID: 2:5020/689.100@FidoNet 345a6a55
AI> ║@REPLY: 2:5020/659.55 345a5204
AI> ║ ;there was a letter here.
AI> ║
AI> ║@Via 2:5020/689.100@fidonet @19971031.233349.UTC+3 T-Mail
AI> ║2603.DOS
AI> ╙─

AI> I don’t know where the glitch is, although I can guess.

well, where is it, if not a secret? really, but I’ve never noticed any problems with kludges. describe to me in more detail the situation and the glitch - it seems to me that something is wrong in the
philharmonic :)

AI> I also saw the PATH kludge here and there, but in my opinion it only means something for hubs
AI>.

Only nodes are written in pes. Zed has a point tosser.

AI> By the way, Zed swears at uuencode by nafigator with crc64, therefore
AI> the nafigator is a Mazda. And small software along with it. crc32 - rulezz!

and more. Some r.e.m. headlines are also too much for him. :(


Bye! mur...@geocities.com
Rick Murray http://letit.base.org
ICQ:6653886