demoZ
ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»
From Artem Haritonov → To All 16 October 1997
HeYa, Aleksander!
Thursday October 09 1997 20:29, Aleksander Senilov wrote to Artem Kharitonov:
[skipo]
AS> Sux you say? Do you remember what the effect was after the release of
AS> INSULT (hidden
AS> part), PSG-WINS People didn’t believe their eyes! I agree that these people
AS> were exclusively Pentagonists, but imho RST7 purely on principle does not want
AS> to be fixed for other cars, because he is a creator, and adjusting the finished effect to
AS> is another matter; I know from experience that it is not a rewarding task. Naturally, you can’t adjust it to everything, especially for a scorpion, on which you simply can’t get smooth movement along the
AS> curb due to the lack of odd commands on it :(
It’s no longer fashionable - therefore it’s morally outdated... At that time - yes!
AS> I didn’t understand something, you say: they’re like everyone else, but “everyone”
AS> has progress. There’s a problem. :) I believe that the discovery of this year was
There is no “problem” - fashion is fashion. Demomaking, like any art,
is subject to the influence of fashion...
AS> an effect with replacing color squares with graphic ones (
AS> was present in almost all prize-winning demos). And imho it was more successful than all others
AS> in Power Up, you won’t even understand how it was done right away! Again
AS> imho, soon
AS> various kinds of 3D effects will come into fashion and they will be everywhere, just like plasma
AS> now :)
Everythingflows - everything changes. There will be progress here too. 1997/98 will pass under the banners of texture mapping and 3d egine.
AH>> In general, the demo is very good... Let's see what E-mage did...
AS> And they also didn’t have time for Inlight?
Yes.
cYa, aRTY/dR! · · ··· Email: Ar...@telecom.nov.ru · · ···
From Sergei Novikov → To All 17 October 1997
AH> Yes.
Like Rage, The Cube, Ecstatic Dub (best)... (?) Acid
Revolution was not shown. In the survey, will we consider these demos as in-light demos?
PS: By the time the organizers of the E-software release, the idea of the survey will no longer be relevant:<(
With God's blessing, Sergei Novikov AKA Spirit/STEP
... Now I lay me down to sleep, I pray the Lord my Soul to keep.
From Igor Gruzdev → To All 18 October 1997
SN> Like Rage, The Cube, Ecstatic Dub (best)... (?) Acid
SN> Revolution was not shown. In the survey, will we consider these demos as in-light demos?
At the discretion of the respondent.
SN> PS: By the time the organizers of the E-software release, the idea of the survey
SN> will no longer be relevant :<(
Vova Larkov is absent for a week. :(
With all sorts of regards and wishes.
Igor.
... So that to know life, you have to live this life to the end.
From Oleg Bashtenko → To All 19 October 1997
Hello Artem.
19 Oct 97 13:53, Artem Haritonov wrote to Sergei Novikov:
[...]
AH> I don’t know, I didn’t like Ecstatic Dub...
But neither on the emulsion nor on the real Speccy Ecstatic did it work,
it comes to the dangling inscription Enlight 97, and on it remains.
It can hang out like this for at least an hour:(
Maybe somewhere you need to press something?
Oleg
... Loneliness, how overpopulated you are!
From Vsevolod Potapov → To All 20 October 1997
> SN> is no longer relevant:<(
>
>Why is this? Soon it will be necessary to translate the questionnaires into English, can you?
Well, look, is it hard to ask native residents of Outland?
Regards,
Random,
Lord of Chaos.
e-mail: ran...@cybermail.net
Concern Chaos WWW HQ: http://www.cybermail.net/~random/
The Speccy Zone: http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/motorola/134/index.html
Cha0s Files : http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/motorola/146/index.html
From Vladimir Yudin → To All 20 October 1997
Hello Oleg!
20 Oct 97 00:48, Oleg Bashtenko wrote to Artem Kharitonov:
OB> But neither on the emulator nor on the real Speccy Ecstatic does
OB> go, it comes to the dangling inscription Enlight 97, and on it
OB> remains. It can hang out like this for at least an hour:(
OB> Maybe there is something I need to click on?
On mine everything looked completely fine.
Sincerely
┬ ┬┌┐┬┐ ┐┬┬
╨╜╨╙╜╨╙ ╨ ╨
From Alex Letaev → To All 22 October 1997
Hello Igor Gruzdev! In a message of 21 Oct 97 Igor Gruzdev wrote to Sergei Novikov:
IG> Actually, it’s strange, of course. The fact that there would be an inlight '97 was known
IG> exactly a year ago (after e'96). If in the year allotted for coding the demo,
IG> there weren’t enough two hours... Well, for me personally, if I didn’t have time (even for
IG> half an hour due to the fact that the trolleybus broke down) - that means I didn’t really want to.
IG> S?
Should the trolleybus have been repaired? :-))))
Sincerely, Alex from FFC COMPUTERS.
From Artem Haritonov → To All 22 October 1997
IG> exactly a year ago (after e'96). If in the year allotted for coding the demo, two hours were not enough... Well, for me personally, if I didn’t have time (even for half an hour
IG> due to the fact that the trolleybus broke down), it means I didn’t really want to. Y?
Exactly right. We made it in time, although the release was 5 hours in advance. to compo.
cYa, aRTY/dR! · · ··· Email: Ar...@telecom.nov.ru · · ···
From Artem Haritonov → To All 22 October 1997
HeYa, Sergei!
Monday October 20 1997 18:48, Sergei Novikov wrote to Artem Haritonov:
[skipo]
AH>> Naturally not. Only what was demonstrated at the party.
SN> Why? After all, the point is not to check the inlight results, but
SN> to choose the best from the demos prepared on E97. And if,
SN> let's say, RAGE was a couple of hours late, why is it worse than others who succeeded?
If you read voting, you will understand (maybe) =)
AH>> Why is that?
SN> What survey, say, at the end of November?
What difference does it make?
AH>> Soon we will need to translate the questionnaires into English, can you?
SN> But we haven’t agreed on them yet. Soap take a look. I will add as soon as
SN> possible.
There is nothing left to add (almost =) )...
SN> Answer: only after RVL4 :) (Guaranteed to be released this week, but
SN> only part 1, without modifications. Although who knows...) And so it’s easy.
Okz...
SN> With God's blessing, Sergei Novikov AKA
SN> Spirit/STEP
SN> ... Now I lay me down to sleep, I pray the Lord my Soul to keep.
cYa, aRTY/dR! · · ··· Email: Ar...@telecom.nov.ru · · ···
From Danil Ermakoff → To All 22 October 1997
VY> On mine everything looked fine.
but the emula lacks performance. and P133 - goes at maximum speed, on
DX4/120 - dangles :(
VY> Best regards
VY> ┬ ┬┌┐┬┐ ┐┬┬
VY> ╨╜╨╙╜╨╙ ╨ ╨
C U L8ER, Danil.
[Green KillarZ Team][Bus CrasherZ Team][Legalize Team][Box Dancerz Team]
From Igor Gruzdev → To All 23 October 1997
IG>> Actually, it’s strange, of course. The fact that there would be an inlight '97 was known
IG>> exactly a year ago (after e'96). If in the year allotted for coding the demo, two hours were not enough... Well, for me personally, if I didn’t have time (even for half an hour
IG>> due to the fact that the trolleybus broke down), it means I didn’t really want to. Y?
From Artem Haritonov → To All 24 October 1997
HeYa, Igor!
Thursday October 23 1997 13:13, Igor Gruzdev wrote to Artem Kharitonov:
IG> I heard somewhere that rage didn’t have time for the Inlight, because
IG> as hospitable hosts, all the spectra were given into the hands of visitors
IG> demo makers to finalize the delivered demo. ;) Or is it just
IG> a beautiful legend? :)
Maybe they were given for the “legend”? =)
cYa, aRTY/dR! · · ··· Email: Ar...@telecom.nov.ru · · ···
From Evgeny Milun → To All 24 October 1997
IG> I heard somewhere that that’s why rage didn’t have time for the inlight, because as
IG> hospitable hosts, all the spectra were given into the hands of visiting demo makers
IG> to finalize the brought demo. ;) Or is this just a beautiful legend?
IG> :)
Well, Shurik told me a similar “legend”. True, there was a very specific name of a very specific group. :)))
Good luck! Evgeny.
■ The night is shorter than the day... The day will kill me... The world of illusions burns down in it. (C) Aria.