Commodore 64

ZXNet echo conference «zx.spectrum»

From HyDRoXiDE To All 25 February 1998


Greetings, All!

Someone here offered a C64 emulator. Soap PLZ!!!!!!!

HyDRoXiDE.
[Team РХТУ] ■ [Team SSW SUXXX & MUSTDIE] ■ [Team M(┤iDE|\|]
[Team 1289] ■ [Team MENDELEVSKY CHEMIK] ■ [DEH Death CluB]
··∙ ───═■ [Team H(┤ppy l0ve] ■═─── ∙··


From Konstantin Masalcev To All 27 February 1998


Hello All!

Wednesday February 25 1998 18:42, HyDRoXiDE wrote to All:

H> Someone here suggested a C64 emulator. Soap up PLZ!!!!!!!

I wouldn’t even _very_ refuse!!! Damn nostalgia...

Konstantin


From basile v. vorontsov To All 27 February 1998

KM> I wouldn’t even _very_ refuse!!! Damn nostalgia...

it takes up 16 megagrams in the archive. so only beerlegs.


From Max Romanoff To All 4 March 1998


ALL, why are you talking about C=64?

H>> Someone here suggested a C64 emulator. Soap up PLZ!!!!!!!

KM> I wouldn’t even refuse!!! Damn nostalgia...


*2ALL*:

Isn't it time to make a corresponding echo/feecha?

Good Luck...


... Hackers stay UP all night.

From Pavel Nikonov To All 4 March 1998

MR> *2ALL*:
MR> Isn’t it time to make a corresponding echo/fech?
And what will happen? "10 people for a dead man's chest" - the nth number of lamers on this
issue + ARtY himself (if he even wants to cover this issue (this is a very
uninteresting and not useful activity)).
If Arty/DR himself picks up the information that he has + emulsion, there will be no messages like ^^^^
(I hope), but there will be quite meaningful questions (at least), there will be fast
programs...
When message C64 begins to appear more and more often (and more) - then you will have to make
a separate echo! (here difficulties will begin with organization and moderation, with
programming....)...
It is better to leave everything as it is - _for now_.
PS. If you don’t want the subject - write to Arty so as not to send the emulsion... The problem itself
will disappear -:)

<- With best regardz,Pavel ->

FunToP - ProgRess in DeMoMakInG... (c) Pol Freeman


From Igor Gruzdev To All 5 March 1998

PN> So what will happen? "10 people for a dead man's chest" - the nth number of lamers on
PN> this issue + ARtY himself (if he even wants to cover this issue (this

There is (existed(?)) echo PVT.C64 - it is possible there, IMHO.


With all kinds of regards and wishes.
Igor.

... Is it really only the stupidity of our enemies that should be the source of our strength?

From Artem Haritonov To All 6 March 1998

PN> very uninteresting and not useful activity)). If Arty/DR himself selects
PN> the information that he has + emulsion, there will be no messages like ^^^^ (I hope), and
PN> there will be quite meaningful questions (in fact), programs will be posted...
PN> When message C64 begins to appear more and more often (and more) - then
PN> you will have to make a separate echo! (this is where difficulties with organization
PN> and moderation, with broaching...)... It's better to leave everything as it is
PN> - _for now_.

The echo, I think, will be too much... Read (for those interested) comp.sys.cbm

PN> PS. If you don’t want the subject, write to Arty so that he doesn’t
PN> send the emulsion... The problem will disappear on its own - :)

=))) He doesn’t care about it on a PC no need... He has his own motorol and the motorolite is not bad.

cYa, aR7Y/dR/FW · · · ··· Email: ar...@telecom.nov.ru ··· · · ·


From Max Romanoff To All 6 March 1998


Pavel is that you?
...why were you telling me about the Commodore 64?

PN> And what will happen? “10 people for a dead man’s chest” - the nth number of lamers
PN> on this issue + ARtY himself (if he even wants to cover this
PN> issue (this is a very uninteresting and not useful activity)).

and well? I think the chest of drawers64 should be carried separately. there will be the same
interested emulators and naturalists... + own
file.

PN> If Arty/DR himself picks up the information he has + emulsion, there won’t be messages
PN> like ^^^^ (I hope), but there will be quite meaningful questions (in fact
PN> them), they will fast programs...

in any case, you need to make a separate fech, and an echo to it...

PN> When message C64 begins to appear more and more often (and more), then you will have to
PN> make a separate echo! (here difficulties will begin with organization and
PN> moderation, with drawl...)...

however, there are quite a lot of topics here that can be separated into
separate echoes, and C=64, I think, is a very isolated thing,
most people here simply don’t need it.

PN> It’s better to leave everything as it is for now - _noka_.

until they start throwing software here - you can live, but this is where it goes...

PN> PS. If you don’t want the subject, write to Arty so that he doesn’t send the emulsion... The problem
PN> will disappear on its own - :)

I don’t care. :) in order to be symmetrical, I’ll send an emulsion for
offtopic :)

Good Luck...


... "Is fire supposed to shoot out of it like that?"

From Konstantin Masalcev To All 7 March 1998

PN>> lamers on this issue + ARtY himself (if he even wants
PN>> to cover this issue (this is

IG> There is (existed(?)) echo PVT.C64 - it’s possible there, IMHO.

The fact of the matter is that it existed... ;(

Konstantin


From Vladimir Larkov To All 30 April 1998

KM> The fact of the matter is that it existed... ;(

It exists. The other thing is whether people like locals like “what should I do
with *.$b” are needed there, while “oh, the emulsion doesn’t sing on my four with a sound-bluster model
lalala, paaaa-maaaa-zhiiii-teeee!!.”


With best wishes, Vladimir.