[01/03] ON-LINE 74

Wednesday March 05, 1997 14:11, Evgeny Milun wrote to Dmitry Grigoryev:

EM> Well, my dear “grandfather,” I read your writings. And honestly
EM> speaking, I had a much better opinion of you. Because you said
EM> "out loud", I say the same thing out loud in this echo.

Clinic...

EM> If you try to remain silent or evade the answer, then let
EM> everyone see that you have nothing to say.

The smart one will understand... I -> you really have nothing to say...

EM> The jokes are over, "Grandpa".

It's cool you can play with pseudonyms! What a fantasy, multivariate!
And he said that he was an adult...

EM> And I publicly demand:

[_DEMANDS_ omitted...]

I am not going to answer all this. Contacting you, as I understand it, is useless; others are most likely already tired of it. I answered half of the questions in
previous messages, the other half is nothing more than the ravings of a madman.
However, if the wishes of other participants in the echo conference are expressed, I
will answer on all points.

EM> To begin with, that’s all. Although, my complaints against you have not yet been exhausted.

I’m sure of it.

EM> P.S. If you think that we are so unpopular, then you are mistaken.

...

EM> If you want war, you will get it.

Fight... Just not here, but in your publication. :)I can imagine the 3rd issue...

EM> Let only a few read us, but they will all learn about the “good manners”
EM> of the chief editor of the newspaper Online, (and whatever your name is) technical
EM> editor of Spectrofon magazine - Dmitry Grigoriev.

:)

Dmitry (OLDMAN).

IG> Hello, Evgeny!

IG> It’s quiet outside the window, and I’m sitting and writing a response to a letter written from Evgeny
IG> Milun to Dmitry Grigoryev Wed Mar 05 1997 at 14:11...

DG>>> Sincerely, Dmitry (OLDMAN).

... skip ...

EM>> (and whatever you call it) technical editor of Spectrofon magazine - Dmitry
EM>> Grigoriev.

IG> Eh... Well, you turn out to be stubborn. Well, if Dmitry does not
IG> respond to this boorish and unfounded letter
IG>, I will understand him. And you will have to apologize. At least in front of all
IG> subscribers of this echo. Although it is a pity that in the rules of the echo there is no clause
IG> for punishment for 'slowness, lack of humor, in general
IG> lack of culture and incorrect attitude towards the participants of the echo.' :(

All these epithets can also be attributed to OLDMAN, and he didn’t just hit on Evgeny Milun here. It’s sad to watch how the Sinclairists squabble among themselves.
:~((

Koljanych of LDK.

DG> The smart one will understand... I -> you really have nothing to say...
Naturally there is nothing - I proved my point of view, but you can’t.

[.....]

DG> [_REQUIREMENTS_ omitted...]

DG> I’m not going to answer all this. As I understand it,
DG> it is useless to contact you; others are most likely already tired of it. I
DG> answered half of the questions in previous messages, the other half is nothing more than delirium
DG> of a madman. However, if the wishes of other participants
DG> of the echo conference are expressed, I will answer on all points.
So, you refuse? Those. you refuse to explain to me, the publisher of the magazine, why you are biased towards my magazine?
I gave you the facts, and you responded with insults again? So,
you don’t owe anyone anything again?
I’m very glad that you said this.
Now our dispute is closed, I am convinced that it is useless to argue with D. Grigoriev about anything
- he is stubborn as...

Good luck! Evgeny.

Hello Igor !

Thursday March 06 1997 22:38, Igor Gruzdev ─── Evgeny Milun:

[.....]

IG> Eh... Well, it turns out you’re being stubborn. Well, if Dmitry does not respond
IG> to this boorish and unfounded letter, I will understand him.
Sorry, sir. And how do YOU ​​know that the letter has no basis ???
Only because I “an unknown small fry” have the audacity to demand something from the “great and mighty OLDMAN” ???
IG> And you will have to apologize. At least in front of all the subscribers of this echo. Although
I will apologize, but first I want to hear answers to the questions that interest me.
Besides “sincere assurances” that he “carefully read” our magazine, I never received from
Grigoriev. Let him just explain to me in human terms
why he, for example, wrote about Empire-128 “before you it was opened by a certain ABK.”
I am purely humanly interested in why ABK “suddenly” became “before us”, although
it is _ONE OF_US_. There are several more similar moments (I wrote about them in my
_PERSONAL_ letter to Grigoriev, and which he published in Online'73) and all of them
remained _WITHOUT_ANSWER_.
IG> I
IG> it is a pity that in the rules of the echo there is no point of punishment for 'slowness,
IG> lack of humor, in general for lack of culture andinappropriate attitude towards
IG> participants of the echo.' :(
You know, lack of culture is not only swear words, but also unsubstantiated
accusations. My accusations are supported by facts, but Online's...
And the fact that Grigoryev directly insulted me in Online'74 "played on" my ignorance (at that time) that Online was spreading through this echo, of course
it doesn’t matter. Yes??? I’m “nobody”, and he’s “everyone”.

Good luck !