Demoscene on the ZX Spectrum: thoughts after DiHalt Lite 2016 - due to the huge number of demo parties in 2015, the authors did not accumulate material for serious work

Demoscene on ZX Spectrum: thoughts after DiHalt Lite 2016
 by Alone Coder

Unfortunately, this DiHalt Lite did not become the "united main"
Spectrum demoparty, what could one hope for in the end
the year before last. Chaos Constructions, with whom we teamed up
a year ago and which had its own circle of authors, this winter
took place. And due to the huge number of demo parties in 2015
The authors never accumulated material for serious work. In the end
the first places instead of Spectrum works were taken by demos on BK-0011
and a picture on the C-64.

From somewhere the idea “so that the cow eats less and
gave more milk, she needs to be fed less and milked more.” B
As a result, demo parties multiply, and the average level of work falls
below the last place on some Enlight'96.

Apparently, until the number of democratic parties returns to normal, leapfrog
weak works discrediting the ZX Spectrum will not stop.
Strong works will appear rarely, without competing on one
party.

Now the parties are simply duplicating each other, even voting
made on the same "filter". And they don’t want to close.
In this situation, the best compromise for Spectrum would be
turning one of the parties into "Spectrum only, any Spectrum, demo
only, realtime only", maybe replacing the show format with the format 
seminar.

First point -"Spectrum only" - will increase the targeting of the party
(something like the Commodore party X, where they exhibit
strongest works). Mixing all 8-bit hardware can
look fashionable, but there are a variety of such parties, including
largest European ones.
And attempts to dilute Spectrum competitions with emulators
they didn’t give Spectrum anything with the crafts, although it’s psychologically understandable
the desire of some organizers to grab themselves (one party from
dozens available) more works of any quality and make friends
for the sake of this with the devil himself.

The second point - "any Spectrum" - will increase the originality of the work. Not
historically meaningful limitation "128K or Pentagon
128+AY", boosted in recent years at some parties,
only made the situation worse in this regard.

Due to the absurdity of this limitation (it did not happen by itself - 
those who promoted it and those who promoted it in the past are known 
by name) it is enough to note that: 
- between these configurations there are 6 years and a change in the generation of the carrier 
information, and the second configuration is homemade with 
random packing, including an additional device; 
- none of these configurations were top-end (Timex Sinclair 
2068 and a disk controller for it with CP/M support appeared 
before the decidedly entertaining Spectrum 128K - optional 
whose memory, by the way, was initially virtual 
disk; they spread each in their own countries; whatconcerns the connection diagram of AY to Pentagon 128, there is no information about it 
information before the appearance of Profi); 
- the circulation of all 128K models in total was a small share of all 
Spectrums (an order of magnitude less than 48K, and in a number of countries generally 
null); 
- even in parties where 48K were excluded (ZX-Net nodes), the share 
128K models according to surveys never exceeded 74% even locally and 
even ignoring additional devices - with a maximum of 1997 
year and a rapid decline in favor of >=256K by 1999: 
Moscow (ZX-Net), April 1996 - 79 pcs. (61%) 128K, 39 pcs. (30%) 
256K or more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=2073
mainly Moscow (ZX-Net), May 1997 - 49 pcs. (74%) 128K, 17 pcs. 
(26%) 256K or more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=1322
St. Petersburg (ZX-Format buyers), July 1997 - 31% 128K, 
49% 256K or more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=9885
ZX.SPECTRUM, July 1997 - 9 pcs. (25%) 128K, 24 pcs. (67%) 256K and 
more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=4745
Gomel, December 1997 - 21 pcs. (70%) 128K, 6 pcs. (20%) 256K and 
more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=3258
Krasnodar, June 1998 - 9 pcs.  (64%) 128K, 2 pcs.(14%) 256K and 
more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=9119
ZX-Net, January 1999 - 42% 128K, 48% 256K and more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=7181
Omsk, January 1999 - 3 pcs. (25%) 128K, 6 pcs. (50%) 512K or more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=11366
CIS or former USSR, July 2000 - 9 pcs. (15%) 128K, 52 pcs. (85%) 
256K or more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=4417
Rostov-on-Don, July 2001 - 50% 128K, the rest 256K or more 
(the sum does not add up) 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=7322
Izhevsk, July 2001 - 100% 512K and more 
http://www.zxpress.ru/article.php?id=9429
- the share of 128K only software is generally small, but as for demos, 
128K demos began to prevail only in August 1998 (this 
clearly tracked in the Chip ZX collection, where the software is located in 
order of arrival and the hardware requirements are marked in the catalog). 
Moreover, already from Demobit'1996, Doxycon 1998, ArtComp'98, Paradox'99, 
Cafe'999 and CC'999 compo machines had additional 
devices, unfortunately, are different; 
- despite problems with compatibility and distribution, 
by different authorsabout a thousand programs have been written for various 
expansions beyond this limit (that’s how 128K is still in our 
years was considered "extended memory"). Including about 200 demos 
and int. 

In this regard, the beginning return of interest in
Timexand Profi, and the long-running movement in terms of Pentagon 1024 and
ATM Turbois far from exhausted. Now, unlike the 90s, 
there is no problem starting any work.

All this hardware is known and understandable, so the audience will 
it is not difficult to judge how effectively it is used. 
For example, everyone understands that the demo for the original Speccy 
has 3 times less RAM than for 128K, and 
only one screen area is available (that is, the good old 
fighting the beam and limiting the types of multicolors). If you take 
class higher and compare with Pentagon 128+AY, then it is taken into account 
lack of whites (acceleration and tempting simplicity 
synchronization), high resolution border and floppy drive, with 
which can be loaded against the background and almost instantly. It is clear that 
demos like Eye Ache 2, Refresh and Stellar Contour simply can't 
work from tape - with a load size three times larger than in 48K 
demah, where it is already long. Demos with support for turbo mode give 
somewhat smoother 3D (from craftsmen who soldered on 
Profi 20 MHz, maybequite smooth, and it can be 
and not the limit), but are limited in the use of some techniques 
code, multicolor, digital sounds and border. But demos for 
Timex, Pentagon with well-known upgrades, ATM, Profi, etc. 
They can forget about multicolor due to hardware video modes. 
General Sound brings back digital audio for dems with support 
turbo, and in general saves RAM and beats for music, giving 
this has a rich sound. And so on. The only question here is 
should we accept SAM Coupe', whose users have been hanging out for a long time 
in your circle. From the old sceners "for", in particular, Y... From 
possible arguments other than the current decoding of SAM as 
"Spectrum Advanced Machine" can be seen loosely covered 
continuity with Timex (due to which non-standard frequencies are not 
surprising, especially since they are also on Pentagon 48/128 
non-standard and also no AY), and memory switching circuit 
brings back memories of ancient, pre-ancient expansion 
branded 48K to 80K in two banks of 32K. 

The third point - "demo only"- will concentrate the efforts of the authors.
Especially artists and composers, who always have no time for dem,
because you have to show up solo at all the parties :)

The fourth point - "realtime only"- is intended to return the past
dem quality (based on the definition of "Realtime demo" onEuropean pssh parties or the wording "clean is prohibited
animation" in the rules of old Russian parties), especially since grain
the return of the code in the demos has already been sown - after many years of them
degradation.

Interestingly, degradation is glorified as a form of art by the same 
circles that support the reproduction of demopathies, castration 
ZX Spectrum and hooliganism on stage. Maybe they're not that bad 
they want harm to the platform (they may not even care that 
will happen to her), but simply defend their lifestyle. But 
the consequences are visible - Russian-language IRC channels have turned into 
flows of slop, forum zx.pk.ru after massive raids and stuffing 
depopulated, some people are embarrassed to release already written software 
(S...), and some are even planning to leave the Spectrum 
scenes with wording like “I became uninterested” (N...) 
and “it became unpleasant for me to communicate” (S...). However, the heart of the scene 
historically it was not among Internet screamers, but more 
measured personal correspondence and information press.

Share your thoughts about the article